PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FBCVX vs. SCHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FBCVX vs. SCHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Blue Chip Value Fund (FBCVX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBCVX achieves a 18.91% return, which is significantly higher than SCHX's 8.04% return. Over the past 10 years, FBCVX has underperformed SCHX with an annualized return of 10.08%, while SCHX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.47% annualized return.


FBCVX

1D
0.26%
1M
4.71%
YTD
18.91%
6M
18.13%
1Y
30.95%
3Y*
14.92%
5Y*
10.50%
10Y*
10.08%

SCHX

1D
-1.29%
1M
-1.16%
YTD
8.04%
6M
7.00%
1Y
23.07%
3Y*
20.75%
5Y*
12.44%
10Y*
15.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBCVX vs. SCHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FBCVX
Fidelity Blue Chip Value Fund
18.91%11.14%4.91%7.07%1.54%25.04%-4.72%21.71%-9.19%14.88%
SCHX
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF
8.04%17.46%24.88%26.84%-19.41%26.81%20.81%31.22%-4.66%21.95%

Correlation

The correlation between FBCVX and SCHX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2009

0.85

The correlation between FBCVX and SCHX shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (3 years) to 0.85 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FBCVX vs. SCHX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FBCVX
SCHX

Financial Services

16.9%
10.4%

Technology

16.1%
37.8%

Healthcare

12.3%
8.5%

Industrials

12.0%
8.8%

Communication Services

9.6%
9.8%

Consumer Cyclical

9.0%
9.4%

Energy

6.7%
3.1%

Consumer Defensive

5.9%
4.5%

Real Estate

4.4%
2.0%

Basic Materials

4.1%
1.8%

Utilities

3.1%
2.6%

Financial Services

FBCVX
16.9%
SCHX
10.4%

Technology

FBCVX
16.1%
SCHX
37.8%

Healthcare

FBCVX
12.3%
SCHX
8.5%

Industrials

FBCVX
12.0%
SCHX
8.8%

Communication Services

FBCVX
9.6%
SCHX
9.8%

Consumer Cyclical

FBCVX
9.0%
SCHX
9.4%

Energy

FBCVX
6.7%
SCHX
3.1%

Consumer Defensive

FBCVX
5.9%
SCHX
4.5%

Real Estate

FBCVX
4.4%
SCHX
2.0%

Basic Materials

FBCVX
4.1%
SCHX
1.8%

Utilities

FBCVX
3.1%
SCHX
2.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FBCVX vs. SCHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBCVX
FBCVX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
FBCVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBCVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBCVX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
FBCVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBCVX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHX
SCHX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
SCHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBCVX vs. SCHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Blue Chip Value Fund (FBCVX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FBCVXSCHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.33

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.35

2.57

+0.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.30

11.26

+2.04

FBCVX vs. SCHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBCVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is higher than the SCHX Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBCVX and SCHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FBCVX vs. SCHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBCVX drawdown since its inception was -63.75%, which is greater than SCHX's maximum drawdown of -34.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBCVX and SCHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FBCVXSCHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.75%

-34.33%

-29.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.29%

-9.02%

-0.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.82%

-19.04%

+4.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.82%

-25.41%

+10.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.65%

-34.33%

-7.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.11%

+3.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.67%

-3.96%

-6.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.34%

2.05%

+0.29%

Volatility

FBCVX vs. SCHX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Blue Chip Value Fund (FBCVX) is 4.17%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) has a volatility of 4.89%. This indicates that FBCVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FBCVXSCHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.17%

4.89%

-0.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.15%

9.94%

+0.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.84%

12.65%

+0.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.74%

17.23%

-3.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.11%

18.16%

-1.05%

FBCVX vs. SCHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBCVX has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHX's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

FBCVX vs. SCHX - Dividend Comparison

FBCVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.48%, more than SCHX's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FBCVX
Fidelity Blue Chip Value Fund
2.48%2.94%9.31%3.64%2.59%1.26%1.07%1.75%1.47%1.11%1.05%1.82%
SCHX
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF
1.03%1.09%1.22%1.39%1.64%1.22%1.64%1.82%2.02%1.70%1.92%2.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


FBCVX and SCHX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHX has higher volatility (4.89%) compared to FBCVX (4.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBCVX dropped -63.75% vs SCHX's -34.33%.

FBCVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FBCVX and SCHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer