PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FBCV vs. SCHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FBCV vs. SCHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Blue Chip Value ETF (FBCV) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBCV achieves a 15.36% return, which is significantly higher than SCHX's 8.81% return.


FBCV

1D
1.11%
1M
3.39%
6M
11.91%
YTD
15.36%
1Y
26.18%
3Y*
14.66%
5Y*
10.08%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.29%

SCHX

1D
0.10%
1M
1.15%
6M
7.57%
YTD
8.81%
1Y
16.68%
3Y*
18.94%
5Y*
11.85%
10Y*
14.81%
ALL TIME*
14.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$358.69K$360.89K$408.68K
$290.88M$311.24M$380.70M

FBCV vs. SCHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FBCV
Fidelity Blue Chip Value ETF
15.36%16.36%10.26%5.45%-2.26%26.18%17.93%
SCHX
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF
8.81%17.46%24.88%26.84%-19.41%26.81%23.27%

Correlation

The correlation between FBCV and SCHX is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2020

0.74

The correlation between FBCV and SCHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

FBCV vs. SCHX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FBCV
SCHX

Financial Services

19.4%
11.7%

Technology

13.3%
36.7%

Healthcare

13.1%
9.2%

Industrials

11.2%
9.4%

Consumer Cyclical

9.9%
9.6%

Consumer Defensive

9.2%
4.6%

Communication Services

9.1%
9.7%

Energy

8.1%
3.1%

Basic Materials

3.9%
1.8%

Utilities

2.1%
2.2%

Real Estate

0.7%
2.1%

Financial Services

FBCV
19.4%
SCHX
11.7%

Technology

FBCV
13.3%
SCHX
36.7%

Healthcare

FBCV
13.1%
SCHX
9.2%

Industrials

FBCV
11.2%
SCHX
9.4%

Consumer Cyclical

FBCV
9.9%
SCHX
9.6%

Consumer Defensive

FBCV
9.2%
SCHX
4.6%

Communication Services

FBCV
9.1%
SCHX
9.7%

Energy

FBCV
8.1%
SCHX
3.1%

Basic Materials

FBCV
3.9%
SCHX
1.8%

Utilities

FBCV
2.1%
SCHX
2.2%

Real Estate

FBCV
0.7%
SCHX
2.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FBCV vs. SCHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBCV
FBCV Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
FBCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBCV Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
FBCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBCV Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHX
SCHX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
SCHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBCV vs. SCHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Blue Chip Value ETF (FBCV) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FBCVSCHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.24

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.75

1.92

+1.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.36

8.16

+7.19

FBCV vs. SCHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBCV Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is higher than the SCHX Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBCV and SCHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FBCV vs. SCHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBCV drawdown since its inception was -15.55%, smaller than the maximum SCHX drawdown of -34.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBCV and SCHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FBCVSCHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.55%

-34.33%

+18.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.04%

-9.02%

+1.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.32%

-19.04%

+4.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.55%

-25.41%

+9.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.39%

-2.42%

+2.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.38%

-3.95%

+0.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.72%

2.12%

-0.40%

Volatility

FBCV vs. SCHX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Blue Chip Value ETF (FBCV) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) have volatilities of 2.97% and 3.02%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FBCVSCHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.97%

3.02%

-0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.77%

9.88%

-2.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.63%

12.75%

-2.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.75%

17.21%

-3.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.65%

18.14%

-3.49%

FBCV vs. SCHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBCV has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHX's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

FBCV vs. SCHX - Dividend Comparison

FBCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%, more than SCHX's 1.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FBCV
Fidelity Blue Chip Value ETF
2.49%2.95%1.75%1.68%2.01%3.13%0.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHX
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF
1.04%1.09%1.22%1.39%1.64%1.22%1.64%1.82%2.02%1.70%1.92%2.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


FBCV and SCHX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHX has higher volatility (3.02%) compared to FBCV (2.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBCV dropped -15.55% vs SCHX's -34.33%.

On 5-year performance, SCHX leads with 11.85% vs 10.08% for FBCV. On fees, SCHX is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SCHX has performed better with a 11.85% return vs 10.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHX is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.57% for FBCV.

FBCV has the higher dividend yield at 2.49%, compared with 1.04% for SCHX.

FBCV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while SCHX is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for FBCV and 0.03% for SCHX.

FBCV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FBCV and SCHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer