FBCV vs. SCHX
FBCV (Fidelity Blue Chip Value ETF) and SCHX (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FBCV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity, while SCHX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index. FBCV is actively managed, while SCHX is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FBCV returned 8.64%/yr vs 13.29%/yr for SCHX. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FBCV charges 0.57%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHX.
Performance
FBCV vs. SCHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FBCV achieves a 9.91% return, which is significantly lower than SCHX's 10.72% return.
FBCV
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 2.72%
- YTD
- 9.91%
- 6M
- 11.56%
- 1Y
- 24.49%
- 3Y*
- 14.94%
- 5Y*
- 8.64%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHX
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 5.06%
- YTD
- 10.72%
- 6M
- 10.60%
- 1Y
- 27.36%
- 3Y*
- 22.38%
- 5Y*
- 13.29%
- 10Y*
- 15.41%
FBCV vs. SCHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBCV Fidelity Blue Chip Value ETF | 9.91% | 16.36% | 10.26% | 5.45% | -2.26% | 26.18% | 16.98% |
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 10.72% | 17.46% | 24.88% | 26.84% | -19.41% | 26.81% | 23.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between FBCV and SCHX is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2020 | 0.74 |
The correlation between FBCV and SCHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
FBCV vs. SCHX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FBCV
SCHX
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Technology
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
FBCV
SCHX
Industrials
FBCV
SCHX
Healthcare
FBCV
SCHX
Technology
FBCV
SCHX
Energy
FBCV
SCHX
Consumer Defensive
FBCV
SCHX
Consumer Cyclical
FBCV
SCHX
Communication Services
FBCV
SCHX
Basic Materials
FBCV
SCHX
Utilities
FBCV
SCHX
Real Estate
FBCV
SCHX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FBCV vs. SCHX — Risk / Return Rank
FBCV
SCHX
FBCV vs. SCHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Blue Chip Value ETF (FBCV) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FBCV | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.41 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.49 | 3.05 | +0.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.27 | 13.85 | +0.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FBCV | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.35 | 2.29 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 | 0.78 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.93 | 0.85 | +0.07 |
Drawdowns
FBCV vs. SCHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FBCV drawdown since its inception was -15.55%, smaller than the maximum SCHX drawdown of -34.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBCV and SCHX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FBCV | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.55% | -34.33% | +18.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.04% | -9.02% | +1.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.32% | -19.04% | +4.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.55% | -25.41% | +9.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.50% | -0.70% | +0.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.45% | -3.97% | +0.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.72% | 1.98% | -0.26% |
Volatility
FBCV vs. SCHX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Blue Chip Value ETF (FBCV) is 2.18%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) has a volatility of 2.91%. This indicates that FBCV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FBCV | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.18% | 2.91% | -0.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.66% | 9.02% | -1.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.49% | 11.99% | -1.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.81% | 17.12% | -3.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.73% | 18.15% | -3.42% |
FBCV vs. SCHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FBCV has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHX's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
FBCV vs. SCHX - Dividend Comparison
FBCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, more than SCHX's 1.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBCV Fidelity Blue Chip Value ETF | 2.69% | 2.95% | 1.75% | 1.68% | 2.01% | 3.13% | 0.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 1.01% | 1.09% | 1.22% | 1.39% | 1.64% | 1.22% | 1.64% | 1.82% | 2.02% | 1.70% | 1.92% | 2.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FBCV and SCHX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHX has higher volatility (2.91%) compared to FBCV (2.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBCV dropped -15.55% vs SCHX's -34.33%.
On 5-year performance, SCHX leads with 13.29% vs 8.64% for FBCV. On fees, SCHX is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, FBCV has been the lower-risk option at 2.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SCHX has performed better with a 13.29% return vs 8.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHX is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.57% for FBCV.
FBCV has the higher dividend yield at 2.69%, compared with 1.01% for SCHX.
FBCV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while SCHX is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for FBCV and 0.03% for SCHX.
FBCV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FBCV and SCHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer