FBCGX vs. FSLBX

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

FBCGX (Fidelity Blue Chip Growth K6 Fund) and FSLBX (Fidelity Select Brokerage and Investment Management Portfolio) are both mutual funds - FBCGX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity, while FSLBX is a Financials Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, FBCGX returned 13.62%/yr vs 9.05%/yr for FSLBX. Their 0.68 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FBCGX charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for FSLBX.

Performance

FBCGX vs. FSLBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Blue Chip Growth K6 Fund (FBCGX) and Fidelity Select Brokerage and Investment Management Portfolio (FSLBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBCGX achieves a 9.45% return, which is significantly higher than FSLBX's -7.19% return.

FBCGX

• 1D: 1.09%
• 1M: -3.87%
• 6M: 9.30%
• YTD: 9.45%
• 1Y: 22.70%
• 3Y*: 25.17%
• 5Y*: 13.62%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 20.15%

FSLBX

• 1D: 0.32%
• 1M: 4.59%
• 6M: -5.69%
• YTD: -7.19%
• 1Y: -10.01%
• 3Y*: 15.07%
• 5Y*: 9.05%
• 10Y*: 15.09%
• ALL TIME*: 11.28%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FBCGX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth K6 Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
FSLBX Fidelity Select Brokerage and Investment Management Portfolio	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

FBCGX vs. FSLBX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FBCGX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth K6 Fund	9.45%	21.33%	38.15%	55.57%	-37.84%	23.00%	62.92%	36.11%	-2.33%	14.15%
FSLBX Fidelity Select Brokerage and Investment Management Portfolio	-7.19%	5.78%	35.74%	27.77%	-17.54%	40.61%	22.66%	31.60%	-15.37%	23.81%

Correlation

The correlation between FBCGX and FSLBX is 0.46, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.46
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.59
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.70
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 25, 2017	0.68

Over the past year, the correlation between FBCGX and FSLBX has dropped to 0.46 - well below their long-term average of 0.68, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

FBCGX vs. FSLBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FBCGX

FBCGX Risk / Return Rank: 30
FBCGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
FBCGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
FBCGX Omega Ratio Rank: 26
FBCGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
FBCGX Martin Ratio Rank: 35

FSLBX

FSLBX Risk / Return Rank: 1
FSLBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
FSLBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
FSLBX Omega Ratio Rank: 1
FSLBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
FSLBX Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FBCGX vs. FSLBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Blue Chip Growth K6 Fund (FBCGX) and Fidelity Select Brokerage and Investment Management Portfolio (FSLBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FBCGX	FSLBX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.98	-0.56	+1.54
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.45	-0.65	+2.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	0.92	+0.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.60	-0.50	+2.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.43	-0.93	+6.35

FBCGX vs. FSLBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBCGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is higher than the FSLBX Sharpe Ratio of -0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBCGX and FSLBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FBCGX vs. FSLBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBCGX drawdown since its inception was -42.55%, smaller than the maximum FSLBX drawdown of -68.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBCGX and FSLBX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FBCGX	FSLBX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.55%	-68.20%	+25.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.64%	-24.67%	+12.03%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.83%	-26.06%	-0.77%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-42.55%	-30.87%	-11.68%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-40.56%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.03%	-13.38%	+5.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.82%	-14.88%	+6.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.72%	13.43%	-9.71%

Volatility

FBCGX vs. FSLBX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Blue Chip Growth K6 Fund (FBCGX) has a higher volatility of 7.30% compared to Fidelity Select Brokerage and Investment Management Portfolio (FSLBX) at 5.74%. This indicates that FBCGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSLBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FBCGX	FSLBX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.30%	5.74%	+1.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.67%	17.49%	-0.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.64%	22.23%	-1.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.39%	23.06%	+2.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.94%	23.53%	+1.41%

FBCGX vs. FSLBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBCGX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than FSLBX's 0.66% expense ratio.

Dividends

FBCGX vs. FSLBX - Dividend Comparison

FBCGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, less than FSLBX's 2.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FBCGX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth K6 Fund	0.88%	0.97%	0.62%	0.26%	0.12%	6.71%	1.26%	0.28%	0.46%	0.13%	0.00%	0.00%
FSLBX Fidelity Select Brokerage and Investment Management Portfolio	2.11%	0.67%	0.69%	1.22%	2.09%	1.39%	3.08%	4.25%	8.94%	5.46%	1.25%	6.37%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FBCGX and FSLBX in my portfolio?

FBCGX and FSLBX have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FBCGX or FSLBX?

FBCGX has higher volatility (7.30%) compared to FSLBX (5.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBCGX dropped -42.55% vs FSLBX's -68.20%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FBCGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.98 vs -0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.