PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FBCG vs. DOXFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FBCG vs. DOXFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG) and Dodge & Cox International Stock X (DOXFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FBCG vs. DOXFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
FBCG
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF
-7.08%18.60%39.05%57.98%-6.56%
DOXFX
Dodge & Cox International Stock X
0.79%38.90%3.85%16.81%-0.58%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBCG achieves a -7.08% return, which is significantly lower than DOXFX's 0.79% return.


FBCG

1D
1.68%
1M
-3.96%
YTD
-7.08%
6M
-5.08%
1Y
26.17%
3Y*
26.11%
5Y*
11.35%
10Y*

DOXFX

1D
2.60%
1M
-7.06%
YTD
0.79%
6M
5.41%
1Y
27.20%
3Y*
16.94%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FBCG vs. DOXFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBCG has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than DOXFX's 0.52% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FBCG vs. DOXFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBCG
FBCG Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
FBCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBCG Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
FBCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBCG Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

DOXFX
DOXFX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
DOXFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DOXFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
DOXFX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
DOXFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
DOXFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBCG vs. DOXFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG) and Dodge & Cox International Stock X (DOXFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FBCGDOXFXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.00

1.84

-0.84

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.57

2.36

-0.79

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.37

-0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.82

2.32

-0.51

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.44

8.82

-2.37

FBCG vs. DOXFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBCG Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is lower than the DOXFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBCG and DOXFX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FBCGDOXFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

1.84

-0.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

1.25

-0.58

Correlation

The correlation between FBCG and DOXFX is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

FBCG vs. DOXFX - Dividend Comparison

FBCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, less than DOXFX's 5.11% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
FBCG
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF
0.05%0.05%0.12%0.02%0.00%0.00%0.01%
DOXFX
Dodge & Cox International Stock X
5.11%5.15%2.36%2.38%2.30%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FBCG vs. DOXFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBCG drawdown since its inception was -43.56%, which is greater than DOXFX's maximum drawdown of -14.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBCG and DOXFX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FBCGDOXFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.56%

-14.41%

-29.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.17%

-11.42%

-3.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.60%

-8.54%

-1.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.78%

-2.76%

-9.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.28%

3.01%

+1.27%

Volatility

FBCG vs. DOXFX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG) has a higher volatility of 8.39% compared to Dodge & Cox International Stock X (DOXFX) at 7.08%. This indicates that FBCG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DOXFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FBCGDOXFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.39%

7.08%

+1.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.84%

9.98%

+4.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.33%

15.13%

+11.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.82%

13.82%

+12.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.92%

13.82%

+12.10%