FATEX vs. GSLLX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class M (FATEX) and Goldman Sachs Flexible Cap Fund (GSLLX).
FATEX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Sep 3, 1996. GSLLX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Jan 31, 2008.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FATEX or GSLLX.
Correlation
The correlation between FATEX and GSLLX is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
FATEX vs. GSLLX - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
FATEX:
1.42
GSLLX:
1.71
FATEX:
1.94
GSLLX:
2.32
FATEX:
1.25
GSLLX:
1.32
FATEX:
1.49
GSLLX:
2.56
FATEX:
6.92
GSLLX:
10.56
FATEX:
4.86%
GSLLX:
2.06%
FATEX:
23.70%
GSLLX:
12.76%
FATEX:
-82.59%
GSLLX:
-50.57%
FATEX:
-2.81%
GSLLX:
-5.66%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FATEX achieves a 36.98% return, which is significantly higher than GSLLX's 20.09% return. Over the past 10 years, FATEX has outperformed GSLLX with an annualized return of 14.04%, while GSLLX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.36% annualized return.
FATEX
36.98%
3.49%
10.01%
37.26%
16.75%
14.04%
GSLLX
20.09%
-2.33%
6.18%
20.49%
11.20%
6.36%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FATEX vs. GSLLX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FATEX has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than GSLLX's 0.71% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FATEX vs. GSLLX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class M (FATEX) and Goldman Sachs Flexible Cap Fund (GSLLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FATEX vs. GSLLX - Dividend Comparison
Neither FATEX nor GSLLX has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FATEX Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class M | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.60% | 8.70% | 1.18% |
GSLLX Goldman Sachs Flexible Cap Fund | 0.00% | 0.41% | 0.33% | 0.36% | 0.61% | 0.84% | 1.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FATEX vs. GSLLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FATEX drawdown since its inception was -82.59%, which is greater than GSLLX's maximum drawdown of -50.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FATEX and GSLLX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FATEX vs. GSLLX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class M (FATEX) has a higher volatility of 5.82% compared to Goldman Sachs Flexible Cap Fund (GSLLX) at 4.59%. This indicates that FATEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSLLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.