PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FATBB vs. VT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FATBB vs. VT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FAT Brands Inc. (FATBB) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FATBB vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FATBB
FAT Brands Inc.
-29.60%-54.87%-11.46%15.57%-59.08%36.56%
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
-1.71%22.43%16.49%22.02%-18.00%2.80%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FATBB achieves a -29.60% return, which is significantly lower than VT's -1.71% return.


FATBB

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
-29.60%
6M
-66.90%
1Y
-67.14%
3Y*
-34.24%
5Y*
10Y*

VT

1D
3.08%
1M
-6.22%
YTD
-1.71%
6M
1.42%
1Y
21.53%
3Y*
16.86%
5Y*
9.22%
10Y*
11.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FAT Brands Inc.

Vanguard Total World Stock ETF

Return for Risk

FATBB vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FATBB
FATBB Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
FATBB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FATBB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
FATBB Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
FATBB Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
FATBB Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

VT
VT Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
VT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
VT Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
VT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
VT Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FATBB vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FAT Brands Inc. (FATBB) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FATBBVTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.17

1.25

-1.42

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.98

1.84

+0.13

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.27

+0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.81

1.83

-2.64

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.80

8.51

-10.31

FATBB vs. VT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FATBB Sharpe Ratio is -0.17, which is lower than the VT Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FATBB and VT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FATBBVTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.17

1.25

-1.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.15

0.40

-0.55

Correlation

The correlation between FATBB and VT is 0.11, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

FATBB vs. VT - Dividend Comparison

FATBB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.82%.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FATBB
FAT Brands Inc.
0.00%0.00%12.73%10.18%10.40%1.92%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
1.82%1.82%1.95%2.08%2.20%1.82%1.66%2.32%2.53%2.11%2.39%2.45%

Drawdowns

FATBB vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FATBB drawdown since its inception was -96.75%, which is greater than VT's maximum drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FATBB and VT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FATBBVTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.75%

-50.27%

-46.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-90.00%

-11.84%

-78.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-91.00%

-6.89%

-84.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-64.73%

-7.08%

-57.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

40.37%

2.55%

+37.82%

Volatility

FATBB vs. VT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FAT Brands Inc. (FATBB) is 0.00%, while Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) has a volatility of 6.33%. This indicates that FATBB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FATBBVTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.00%

6.33%

-6.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

199.09%

9.95%

+189.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

404.32%

17.24%

+387.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

210.47%

15.98%

+194.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

210.47%

17.20%

+193.27%