FAT vs. FGEN
Compare and contrast key facts about FAT Brands Inc. (FAT) and FibroGen, Inc. (FGEN).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FAT or FGEN.
Correlation
The correlation between FAT and FGEN is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
FAT vs. FGEN - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
FAT:
68.00%
FGEN:
139.02%
FAT:
-4.51%
FGEN:
-8.46%
FAT:
-4.51%
FGEN:
-5.52%
Fundamentals
FAT:
$49.13M
FGEN:
$31.08M
FAT:
-$11.60
FGEN:
-$1.53
FAT:
0.08
FGEN:
1.05
FAT:
12.81
FGEN:
53.83
FAT:
$440.69M
FGEN:
-$26.28M
FAT:
$114.50M
FGEN:
-$16.09M
FAT:
-$22.27M
FGEN:
-$118.02M
Returns By Period
FAT
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
FGEN
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FAT vs. FGEN — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
FAT
FGEN
FAT vs. FGEN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FAT Brands Inc. (FAT) and FibroGen, Inc. (FGEN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
FAT vs. FGEN - Dividend Comparison
Neither FAT nor FGEN has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
FAT vs. FGEN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FAT drawdown since its inception was -4.51%, smaller than the maximum FGEN drawdown of -8.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAT and FGEN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Loading data...
Volatility
FAT vs. FGEN - Volatility Comparison
Loading data...
Financials
FAT vs. FGEN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between FAT Brands Inc. and FibroGen, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FAT vs. FGEN - Profitability Comparison
FAT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, FAT Brands Inc. reported a gross profit of 36.28M and revenue of 145.28M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.0%.
FGEN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, FibroGen, Inc. reported a gross profit of -102.59M and revenue of -123.26M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 83.2%.
FAT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, FAT Brands Inc. reported an operating income of -39.30M and revenue of 145.28M, resulting in an operating margin of -27.1%.
FGEN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, FibroGen, Inc. reported an operating income of -91.66M and revenue of -123.26M, resulting in an operating margin of 74.4%.
FAT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, FAT Brands Inc. reported a net income of -67.42M and revenue of 145.28M, resulting in a net margin of -46.4%.
FGEN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, FibroGen, Inc. reported a net income of 17.98M and revenue of -123.26M, resulting in a net margin of -14.6%.