PortfoliosLab logo
FAST vs. RTX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between FAST and RTX is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

FAST vs. RTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fastenal Company (FAST) and Raytheon Technologies Corporation (RTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FAST:

1.05

RTX:

1.23

Sortino Ratio

FAST:

1.76

RTX:

1.65

Omega Ratio

FAST:

1.22

RTX:

1.26

Calmar Ratio

FAST:

1.29

RTX:

1.92

Martin Ratio

FAST:

3.79

RTX:

6.57

Ulcer Index

FAST:

6.92%

RTX:

4.71%

Daily Std Dev

FAST:

25.84%

RTX:

26.16%

Max Drawdown

FAST:

-63.43%

RTX:

-52.67%

Current Drawdown

FAST:

-0.46%

RTX:

-0.13%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FAST:

$47.63B

RTX:

$181.05B

EPS

FAST:

$2.00

RTX:

$3.41

PE Ratio

FAST:

41.52

RTX:

39.73

PEG Ratio

FAST:

3.77

RTX:

1.46

PS Ratio

FAST:

6.26

RTX:

2.22

PB Ratio

FAST:

12.73

RTX:

2.94

Total Revenue (TTM)

FAST:

$7.61B

RTX:

$81.74B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FAST:

$3.42B

RTX:

$15.97B

EBITDA (TTM)

FAST:

$1.69B

RTX:

$12.78B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAST achieves a 16.76% return, which is significantly lower than RTX's 17.67% return. Over the past 10 years, FAST has outperformed RTX with an annualized return of 17.77%, while RTX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.68% annualized return.


FAST

YTD

16.76%

1M

2.33%

6M

2.58%

1Y

27.78%

5Y*

19.40%

10Y*

17.77%

RTX

YTD

17.67%

1M

5.11%

6M

14.88%

1Y

32.10%

5Y*

21.38%

10Y*

8.68%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FAST vs. RTX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAST
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FAST is 8383
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FAST is 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FAST is 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FAST is 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FAST is 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FAST is 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

RTX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RTX is 8787
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RTX is 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RTX is 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RTX is 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RTX is 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RTX is 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FAST vs. RTX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fastenal Company (FAST) and Raytheon Technologies Corporation (RTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current FAST Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is comparable to the RTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAST and RTX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

FAST vs. RTX - Dividend Comparison

FAST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, more than RTX's 1.40% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FAST
Fastenal Company
1.99%2.17%2.75%2.62%1.75%2.87%2.35%2.95%2.34%2.55%2.74%2.10%
RTX
Raytheon Technologies Corporation
1.40%2.14%2.76%2.14%2.33%2.64%1.96%2.66%2.13%2.39%2.66%2.05%

Drawdowns

FAST vs. RTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAST drawdown since its inception was -63.43%, which is greater than RTX's maximum drawdown of -52.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAST and RTX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

FAST vs. RTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fastenal Company (FAST) is 7.55%, while Raytheon Technologies Corporation (RTX) has a volatility of 13.53%. This indicates that FAST experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

FAST vs. RTX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Fastenal Company and Raytheon Technologies Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B20212022202320242025
1.96B
20.31B
(FAST) Total Revenue
(RTX) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

FAST vs. RTX - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Fastenal Company and Raytheon Technologies Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%20212022202320242025
45.1%
20.3%
(FAST) Gross Margin
(RTX) Gross Margin
FAST - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Fastenal Company reported a gross profit of 883.90M and revenue of 1.96B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.1%.

RTX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Raytheon Technologies Corporation reported a gross profit of 4.12B and revenue of 20.31B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.3%.

FAST - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Fastenal Company reported an operating income of 393.90M and revenue of 1.96B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.1%.

RTX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Raytheon Technologies Corporation reported an operating income of 2.04B and revenue of 20.31B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.0%.

FAST - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Fastenal Company reported a net income of 298.70M and revenue of 1.96B, resulting in a net margin of 15.2%.

RTX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Raytheon Technologies Corporation reported a net income of 1.54B and revenue of 20.31B, resulting in a net margin of 7.6%.