PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FAST vs. LMT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between FAST and LMT is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.2

Performance

FAST vs. LMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fastenal Company (FAST) and Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

10,000.00%15,000.00%20,000.00%25,000.00%30,000.00%35,000.00%40,000.00%45,000.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
38,328.35%
11,465.40%
FAST
LMT

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FAST:

0.79

LMT:

0.79

Sortino Ratio

FAST:

1.40

LMT:

1.18

Omega Ratio

FAST:

1.18

LMT:

1.17

Calmar Ratio

FAST:

0.90

LMT:

0.62

Martin Ratio

FAST:

1.81

LMT:

2.07

Ulcer Index

FAST:

10.15%

LMT:

6.47%

Daily Std Dev

FAST:

23.38%

LMT:

16.98%

Max Drawdown

FAST:

-63.43%

LMT:

-70.23%

Current Drawdown

FAST:

-11.30%

LMT:

-19.94%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FAST:

$44.48B

LMT:

$116.29B

EPS

FAST:

$2.01

LMT:

$27.63

PE Ratio

FAST:

38.63

LMT:

17.76

PEG Ratio

FAST:

4.28

LMT:

4.02

Total Revenue (TTM)

FAST:

$7.48B

LMT:

$71.30B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FAST:

$3.26B

LMT:

$8.62B

EBITDA (TTM)

FAST:

$1.69B

LMT:

$10.39B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAST achieves a 18.12% return, which is significantly higher than LMT's 10.72% return. Over the past 10 years, FAST has outperformed LMT with an annualized return of 15.20%, while LMT has yielded a comparatively lower 12.59% annualized return.


FAST

YTD

18.12%

1M

-8.56%

6M

15.76%

1Y

17.54%

5Y*

18.16%

10Y*

15.20%

LMT

YTD

10.72%

1M

-7.97%

6M

5.82%

1Y

12.01%

5Y*

7.68%

10Y*

12.59%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FAST vs. LMT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fastenal Company (FAST) and Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FAST, currently valued at 0.79, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.000.790.79
The chart of Sortino ratio for FAST, currently valued at 1.40, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.401.18
The chart of Omega ratio for FAST, currently valued at 1.18, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.181.17
The chart of Calmar ratio for FAST, currently valued at 0.90, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.900.62
The chart of Martin ratio for FAST, currently valued at 1.81, compared to the broader market-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.0025.001.812.07
FAST
LMT

The current FAST Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is comparable to the LMT Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAST and LMT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.503.003.50JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
0.79
0.79
FAST
LMT

Dividends

FAST vs. LMT - Dividend Comparison

FAST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.09%, less than LMT's 2.61% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
FAST
Fastenal Company
2.09%2.75%2.62%1.75%2.87%2.35%2.95%2.34%2.55%2.74%2.10%1.68%
LMT
Lockheed Martin Corporation
2.61%2.68%2.34%2.98%2.76%2.31%3.13%2.32%2.71%2.83%2.85%3.22%

Drawdowns

FAST vs. LMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAST drawdown since its inception was -63.43%, smaller than the maximum LMT drawdown of -70.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAST and LMT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-11.30%
-19.94%
FAST
LMT

Volatility

FAST vs. LMT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fastenal Company (FAST) is 4.74%, while Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) has a volatility of 5.60%. This indicates that FAST experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
4.74%
5.60%
FAST
LMT

Financials

FAST vs. LMT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Fastenal Company and Lockheed Martin Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab