FAST vs. LMT
Compare and contrast key facts about Fastenal Company (FAST) and Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FAST or LMT.
Performance
FAST vs. LMT - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FAST achieves a 29.17% return, which is significantly higher than LMT's 20.31% return. Over the past 10 years, FAST has outperformed LMT with an annualized return of 16.87%, while LMT has yielded a comparatively lower 14.09% annualized return.
FAST
29.17%
5.75%
24.08%
38.70%
21.27%
16.87%
LMT
20.31%
-13.00%
15.25%
22.55%
9.39%
14.09%
Fundamentals
| FAST | LMT | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $46.77B | $126.75B |
| EPS | $2.01 | $27.62 |
| PEG Ratio | 4.47 | 4.36 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | $7.48B | $71.30B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $3.26B | $8.62B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $1.69B | $10.39B |
Key characteristics
| FAST | LMT | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.65 | 1.45 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.64 | 2.04 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.35 | 1.30 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.88 | 1.60 |
| Martin Ratio | 3.82 | 5.52 |
| Ulcer Index | 10.00% | 4.30% |
| Daily Std Dev | 23.11% | 16.37% |
| Max Drawdown | -63.43% | -70.23% |
| Current Drawdown | -3.00% | -13.00% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Correlation
The correlation between FAST and LMT is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FAST vs. LMT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fastenal Company (FAST) and Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FAST vs. LMT - Dividend Comparison
FAST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.37%, which matches LMT's 2.36% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAST Fastenal Company | 2.37% | 2.75% | 2.62% | 1.75% | 2.87% | 2.35% | 2.95% | 2.34% | 2.55% | 2.74% | 2.10% | 1.68% |
LMT Lockheed Martin Corporation | 2.36% | 2.68% | 2.34% | 2.98% | 2.76% | 2.31% | 3.13% | 2.32% | 2.71% | 2.83% | 2.85% | 3.22% |
Drawdowns
FAST vs. LMT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FAST drawdown since its inception was -63.43%, smaller than the maximum LMT drawdown of -70.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAST and LMT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FAST vs. LMT - Volatility Comparison
Fastenal Company (FAST) has a higher volatility of 7.62% compared to Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) at 5.38%. This indicates that FAST's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
FAST vs. LMT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Fastenal Company and Lockheed Martin Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities