FAS vs. IAI

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

FAS (Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X ETF) and IAI (iShares U.S. Broker-Dealers & Securities Exchanges ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FAS is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Financial Select Sector Index, while IAI is a Financials Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select Investment Services Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FAS returned 22.40%/yr vs 18.96%/yr for IAI. Their correlation of 0.88 means they have usually moved in the same direction. FAS charges 0.88%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for IAI.

Performance

FAS vs. IAI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X ETF (FAS) and iShares U.S. Broker-Dealers & Securities Exchanges ETF (IAI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAS achieves a 4.28% return, which is significantly lower than IAI's 4.55% return. Over the past 10 years, FAS has outperformed IAI with an annualized return of 22.40%, while IAI has yielded a comparatively lower 18.96% annualized return.

FAS

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: 6.21%
• 6M: 13.95%
• YTD: 4.28%
• 1Y: 20.90%
• 3Y*: 39.15%
• 5Y*: 13.37%
• 10Y*: 22.40%
• ALL TIME*: 14.10%

IAI

• 1D: -0.34%
• 1M: 1.07%
• 6M: 1.69%
• YTD: 4.55%
• 1Y: 10.23%
• 3Y*: 25.58%
• 5Y*: 14.36%
• 10Y*: 18.96%
• ALL TIME*: 8.22%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FAS Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X ETF	$68.48M	$83.31M	$86.79M
IAI iShares U.S. Broker-Dealers & Securities Exchanges ETF	$12.11M	$13.79M	$19.12M

FAS vs. IAI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FAS Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X ETF	4.28%	21.48%	84.47%	14.92%	-43.19%	116.59%	-34.97%	113.04%	-33.84%	67.37%
IAI iShares U.S. Broker-Dealers & Securities Exchanges ETF	4.55%	25.80%	34.37%	15.27%	-10.87%	40.48%	18.61%	24.26%	-9.47%	28.86%

Correlation

The correlation between FAS and IAI is 0.76, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.76
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.80
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.85
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2008	0.88

The correlation between FAS and IAI shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (1 year) to 0.88 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FAS vs. IAI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FAS	IAI
Financial Services	98.2%	99.9%
Technology	1.6%	0.1%
Industrials	0.2%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

FAS vs. IAI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FAS

FAS Risk / Return Rank: 19
FAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
FAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
FAS Omega Ratio Rank: 21
FAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
FAS Martin Ratio Rank: 16

IAI

IAI Risk / Return Rank: 19
IAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
IAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
IAI Omega Ratio Rank: 19
IAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
IAI Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FAS vs. IAI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X ETF (FAS) and iShares U.S. Broker-Dealers & Securities Exchanges ETF (IAI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FAS	IAI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.33	0.36	-0.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.73	0.63	+0.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.08	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.35	0.44	-0.09
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.78	1.23	-0.45

FAS vs. IAI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAS Sharpe Ratio is 0.33, which is comparable to the IAI Sharpe Ratio of 0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAS and IAI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FAS vs. IAI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAS drawdown since its inception was -91.61%, which is greater than IAI's maximum drawdown of -75.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAS and IAI.

Drawdown Indicators

	FAS	IAI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-91.61%	-75.46%	-16.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-40.88%	-16.52%	-24.36%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-43.10%	-23.14%	-19.96%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-66.88%	-28.84%	-38.04%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-85.99%	-40.38%	-45.61%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.32%	-5.12%	+0.80%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-30.97%	-22.51%	-8.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	18.40%	5.95%	+12.45%

Volatility

FAS vs. IAI - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X ETF (FAS) has a higher volatility of 11.99% compared to iShares U.S. Broker-Dealers & Securities Exchanges ETF (IAI) at 6.58%. This indicates that FAS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IAI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FAS	IAI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.99%	6.58%	+5.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	32.90%	16.11%	+16.79%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	43.83%	20.28%	+23.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	54.99%	21.51%	+33.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	61.11%	22.76%	+38.35%

FAS vs. IAI - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAS has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than IAI's 0.38% expense ratio.

Dividends

FAS vs. IAI - Dividend Comparison

FAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.05%, more than IAI's 1.10% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FAS Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X ETF	8.05%	8.21%	0.76%	1.77%	0.91%	0.60%	0.47%	0.62%	1.43%	0.11%	0.00%	0.00%
IAI iShares U.S. Broker-Dealers & Securities Exchanges ETF	1.10%	0.95%	1.05%	1.80%	2.14%	1.31%	1.55%	1.52%	1.58%	1.37%	1.49%	1.31%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FAS and IAI in my portfolio?

FAS and IAI have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FAS or IAI?

FAS has higher volatility (11.99%) compared to IAI (6.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAS dropped -91.61% vs IAI's -75.46%.

Which ETF is better, FAS or IAI?

On 10-year performance, FAS leads with 22.40% vs 18.96% for IAI. On fees, IAI is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, IAI has been the lower-risk option at 6.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FAS or IAI?

Over the 10-year period, FAS has performed better with a 22.40% return vs 18.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FAS or IAI?

IAI is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for FAS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FAS or IAI?

FAS has the higher dividend yield at 8.05%, compared with 1.10% for IAI.

What is the main difference between FAS and IAI?

FAS is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while IAI is Financials Equities. FAS tracks Financial Select Sector Index, while IAI tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Investment Services Index. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.88% for FAS and 0.38% for IAI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IAI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.36 vs 0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.