FARO vs. GILT

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about FARO Technologies, Inc. (FARO) and Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd (GILT).

Performance

FARO vs. GILT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FARO Technologies, Inc. (FARO) and Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd (GILT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FARO vs. GILT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FARO FARO Technologies, Inc.	0.00%	73.46%	12.56%	-23.39%	-58.00%	-0.86%	40.28%	23.89%	-13.53%	30.56%
GILT Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd	16.07%	110.41%	0.65%	5.34%	-17.96%	18.14%	-12.01%	-9.43%	18.35%	54.49%

Fundamentals

Total Revenue (TTM) FARO : $341.05M GILT : $451.66M
Gross Profit (TTM) FARO : $191.08M GILT : $133.34M
EBITDA (TTM) FARO : $28.20M GILT : $47.09M

Returns By Period

FARO

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GILT

• 1D: 5.26%
• 1M: -5.53%
• YTD: 16.07%
• 6M: 15.36%
• 1Y: 136.54%
• 3Y*: 43.15%
• 5Y*: 6.88%
• 10Y*: 14.65%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

FARO vs. GILT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GILT

GILT Risk / Return Rank: 90
GILT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
GILT Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
GILT Omega Ratio Rank: 87
GILT Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
GILT Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FARO vs. GILT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FARO Technologies, Inc. (FARO) and Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd (GILT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FARO	GILT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.14	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.15	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.32	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	-0.15	—

Correlation

The correlation between FARO and GILT is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

FARO vs. GILT - Dividend Comparison

Neither FARO nor GILT has paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FARO FARO Technologies, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
GILT Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	8.91%	5.52%	5.71%

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	FARO	GILT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-99.94%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-33.65%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-63.20%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-80.89%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-99.47%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-80.68%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	11.83%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FARO	GILT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	21.05%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	50.55%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	64.33%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	46.50%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	46.28%	—

Financials