FAOFX vs. XLK

In the year-to-date period, FAOFX achieves a 0.12% return, which is significantly higher than XLK's -0.52% return. Over the past 10 years, FAOFX has underperformed XLK with an annualized return of 3.67%, while XLK has yielded a comparatively higher 19.65% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

FAOFX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than XLK's 0.13% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Series Growth Opportunities Fund (FAOFX) and Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current FAOFX Sharpe Ratio is 0.32, which is comparable to the XLK Sharpe Ratio of 0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAOFX and XLK, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

FAOFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.74%, more than XLK's 0.68% yield.

The maximum FAOFX drawdown since its inception was -59.22%, smaller than the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAOFX and XLK.

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Series Growth Opportunities Fund (FAOFX) is 6.10%, while Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLK) has a volatility of 6.47%. This indicates that FAOFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.