PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FAOFX vs. XLK
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FAOFX vs. XLK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Series Growth Opportunities Fund (FAOFX) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FAOFX vs. XLK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FAOFX
Fidelity Advisor Series Growth Opportunities Fund
-8.82%22.32%39.90%46.96%-37.34%13.29%68.46%40.79%16.47%35.62%
XLK
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF
-6.18%24.61%21.63%56.02%-27.73%34.74%43.62%49.86%-1.68%34.26%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAOFX achieves a -8.82% return, which is significantly lower than XLK's -6.18% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FAOFX having a 20.25% annualized return and XLK not far ahead at 21.00%.


FAOFX

1D
4.64%
1M
-5.60%
YTD
-8.82%
6M
-7.85%
1Y
23.88%
3Y*
25.92%
5Y*
9.10%
10Y*
20.25%

XLK

1D
1.51%
1M
-3.20%
YTD
-6.18%
6M
-4.94%
1Y
30.47%
3Y*
22.19%
5Y*
15.65%
10Y*
21.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FAOFX vs. XLK - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAOFX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than XLK's 0.08% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

FAOFX vs. XLK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAOFX
FAOFX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
FAOFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAOFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAOFX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
FAOFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAOFX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

XLK
XLK Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
XLK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLK Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLK Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
XLK Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLK Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAOFX vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Series Growth Opportunities Fund (FAOFX) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FAOFXXLKDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.03

1.13

-0.10

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.56

1.71

-0.15

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.24

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.60

1.97

-0.38

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.65

6.31

-0.66

FAOFX vs. XLK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAOFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is comparable to the XLK Sharpe Ratio of 1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAOFX and XLK, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FAOFXXLKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.03

1.13

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

0.64

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

0.87

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.79

0.36

+0.42

Correlation

The correlation between FAOFX and XLK is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

FAOFX vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison

FAOFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.99%, more than XLK's 0.57% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FAOFX
Fidelity Advisor Series Growth Opportunities Fund
16.99%15.49%8.75%0.33%0.54%30.66%32.61%28.66%24.08%10.40%4.35%11.85%
XLK
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF
0.57%0.54%0.66%0.76%1.04%0.65%0.92%1.16%1.60%1.37%1.74%1.79%

Drawdowns

FAOFX vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAOFX drawdown since its inception was -43.59%, smaller than the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAOFX and XLK.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FAOFXXLKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.59%

-82.05%

+38.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.48%

-15.92%

+0.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.59%

-33.56%

-10.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.59%

-33.56%

-10.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.56%

-11.04%

-0.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.19%

-35.17%

+26.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.38%

4.98%

-0.60%

Volatility

FAOFX vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Series Growth Opportunities Fund (FAOFX) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) have volatilities of 8.34% and 8.12%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FAOFXXLKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.34%

8.12%

+0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.74%

16.49%

-1.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.75%

27.05%

-2.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.05%

24.72%

+0.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.83%

24.33%

-0.50%