FAOFX vs. FBGRX

In the year-to-date period, FAOFX achieves a 0.12% return, which is significantly higher than FBGRX's -3.61% return. Over the past 10 years, FAOFX has underperformed FBGRX with an annualized return of 3.67%, while FBGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.86% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

FAOFX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FBGRX's 0.79% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Series Growth Opportunities Fund (FAOFX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current FAOFX Sharpe Ratio is 0.32, which is comparable to the FBGRX Sharpe Ratio of 0.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAOFX and FBGRX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

FAOFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.74%, more than FBGRX's 6.17% yield.

The maximum FAOFX drawdown since its inception was -59.22%, roughly equal to the maximum FBGRX drawdown of -58.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAOFX and FBGRX.

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Series Growth Opportunities Fund (FAOFX) is 6.10%, while Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX) has a volatility of 6.52%. This indicates that FAOFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.