FANG vs. SCHD
Compare and contrast key facts about Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD).
SCHD is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. It was launched on Oct 20, 2011.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FANG or SCHD.
Correlation
The correlation between FANG and SCHD is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
FANG vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
FANG:
0.14
SCHD:
1.20
FANG:
0.39
SCHD:
1.76
FANG:
1.05
SCHD:
1.21
FANG:
0.15
SCHD:
1.69
FANG:
0.42
SCHD:
5.86
FANG:
9.21%
SCHD:
2.30%
FANG:
28.20%
SCHD:
11.25%
FANG:
-88.72%
SCHD:
-33.37%
FANG:
-25.29%
SCHD:
-6.72%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FANG achieves a 4.36% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 11.54% return. Over the past 10 years, FANG has outperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 12.21%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively lower 10.86% annualized return.
FANG
4.36%
-14.61%
-17.44%
3.57%
17.01%
12.21%
SCHD
11.54%
-4.06%
7.86%
12.63%
10.97%
10.86%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FANG vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FANG vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
FANG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.35%, more than SCHD's 3.64% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FANG Diamondback Energy, Inc. | 5.35% | 5.15% | 6.55% | 1.62% | 3.10% | 0.74% | 0.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHD Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% | 2.63% | 2.47% |
Drawdowns
FANG vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FANG drawdown since its inception was -88.72%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FANG and SCHD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FANG vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) has a higher volatility of 7.53% compared to Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 3.88%. This indicates that FANG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.