PortfoliosLab logo
FANG vs. MAIN
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between FANG and MAIN is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

FANG vs. MAIN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) and Main Street Capital Corporation (MAIN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FANG:

-0.63

MAIN:

0.91

Sortino Ratio

FANG:

-0.72

MAIN:

1.07

Omega Ratio

FANG:

0.90

MAIN:

1.15

Calmar Ratio

FANG:

-0.61

MAIN:

0.72

Martin Ratio

FANG:

-1.37

MAIN:

2.48

Ulcer Index

FANG:

18.89%

MAIN:

6.05%

Daily Std Dev

FANG:

39.17%

MAIN:

21.36%

Max Drawdown

FANG:

-88.72%

MAIN:

-64.53%

Current Drawdown

FANG:

-29.02%

MAIN:

-12.81%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FANG:

$42.03B

MAIN:

$4.80B

EPS

FANG:

$16.08

MAIN:

$5.90

PE Ratio

FANG:

8.89

MAIN:

9.15

PEG Ratio

FANG:

1.20

MAIN:

2.09

PS Ratio

FANG:

3.40

MAIN:

8.88

PB Ratio

FANG:

1.09

MAIN:

1.68

Total Revenue (TTM)

FANG:

$12.87B

MAIN:

$605.02M

Gross Profit (TTM)

FANG:

$8.81B

MAIN:

$436.33M

EBITDA (TTM)

FANG:

$8.98B

MAIN:

$468.70M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FANG achieves a -10.15% return, which is significantly lower than MAIN's -5.29% return. Over the past 10 years, FANG has underperformed MAIN with an annualized return of 8.92%, while MAIN has yielded a comparatively higher 14.30% annualized return.


FANG

YTD

-10.15%

1M

13.30%

6M

-17.77%

1Y

-24.69%

5Y*

36.59%

10Y*

8.92%

MAIN

YTD

-5.29%

1M

4.64%

6M

7.19%

1Y

19.28%

5Y*

23.96%

10Y*

14.30%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FANG vs. MAIN — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FANG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FANG is 1414
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FANG is 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FANG is 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FANG is 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FANG is 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FANG is 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

MAIN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MAIN is 7474
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MAIN is 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MAIN is 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MAIN is 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MAIN is 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MAIN is 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FANG vs. MAIN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) and Main Street Capital Corporation (MAIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current FANG Sharpe Ratio is -0.63, which is lower than the MAIN Sharpe Ratio of 0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FANG and MAIN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

FANG vs. MAIN - Dividend Comparison

FANG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.25%, less than MAIN's 7.71% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FANG
Diamondback Energy, Inc.
4.25%5.06%5.15%6.55%1.62%3.10%0.74%0.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MAIN
Main Street Capital Corporation
7.71%7.02%8.55%7.97%5.74%6.99%6.76%8.43%7.02%7.42%9.15%8.72%

Drawdowns

FANG vs. MAIN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FANG drawdown since its inception was -88.72%, which is greater than MAIN's maximum drawdown of -64.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FANG and MAIN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

FANG vs. MAIN - Volatility Comparison

Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) has a higher volatility of 11.78% compared to Main Street Capital Corporation (MAIN) at 6.67%. This indicates that FANG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MAIN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

FANG vs. MAIN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Diamondback Energy, Inc. and Main Street Capital Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B20212022202320242025
4.05B
139.52M
(FANG) Total Revenue
(MAIN) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items