PortfoliosLab logo
FANG vs. INVH
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between FANG and INVH is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

FANG vs. INVH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) and Invitation Homes Inc. (INVH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FANG:

-0.63

INVH:

-0.05

Sortino Ratio

FANG:

-0.71

INVH:

0.12

Omega Ratio

FANG:

0.90

INVH:

1.02

Calmar Ratio

FANG:

-0.60

INVH:

-0.02

Martin Ratio

FANG:

-1.33

INVH:

-0.06

Ulcer Index

FANG:

19.06%

INVH:

8.53%

Daily Std Dev

FANG:

39.17%

INVH:

22.54%

Max Drawdown

FANG:

-88.72%

INVH:

-50.54%

Current Drawdown

FANG:

-29.68%

INVH:

-18.01%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FANG:

$42.71B

INVH:

$20.67B

EPS

FANG:

$16.08

INVH:

$0.78

PE Ratio

FANG:

9.09

INVH:

43.24

PEG Ratio

FANG:

1.20

INVH:

13.76

PS Ratio

FANG:

3.48

INVH:

7.89

PB Ratio

FANG:

1.09

INVH:

2.18

Total Revenue (TTM)

FANG:

$12.87B

INVH:

$2.67B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FANG:

$8.81B

INVH:

$1.41B

EBITDA (TTM)

FANG:

$8.98B

INVH:

$1.80B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FANG achieves a -10.98% return, which is significantly lower than INVH's 5.58% return.


FANG

YTD

-10.98%

1M

13.46%

6M

-19.58%

1Y

-25.10%

5Y*

35.88%

10Y*

8.81%

INVH

YTD

5.58%

1M

2.35%

6M

0.44%

1Y

-1.08%

5Y*

9.73%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FANG vs. INVH — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FANG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FANG is 1515
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FANG is 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FANG is 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FANG is 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FANG is 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FANG is 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

INVH
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of INVH is 4545
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of INVH is 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of INVH is 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of INVH is 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of INVH is 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of INVH is 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FANG vs. INVH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) and Invitation Homes Inc. (INVH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current FANG Sharpe Ratio is -0.63, which is lower than the INVH Sharpe Ratio of -0.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FANG and INVH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

FANG vs. INVH - Dividend Comparison

FANG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.62%, more than INVH's 3.41% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017
FANG
Diamondback Energy, Inc.
3.62%5.06%5.15%6.55%1.62%3.10%0.74%0.40%0.00%
INVH
Invitation Homes Inc.
3.41%3.53%3.87%2.97%1.50%2.02%1.74%2.19%0.93%

Drawdowns

FANG vs. INVH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FANG drawdown since its inception was -88.72%, which is greater than INVH's maximum drawdown of -50.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FANG and INVH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

FANG vs. INVH - Volatility Comparison

Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) has a higher volatility of 11.73% compared to Invitation Homes Inc. (INVH) at 5.56%. This indicates that FANG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INVH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

FANG vs. INVH - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Diamondback Energy, Inc. and Invitation Homes Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B20212022202320242025
4.05B
674.48M
(FANG) Total Revenue
(INVH) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

FANG vs. INVH - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Diamondback Energy, Inc. and Invitation Homes Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
91.6%
59.4%
(FANG) Gross Margin
(INVH) Gross Margin
FANG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Diamondback Energy, Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.71B and revenue of 4.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 91.6%.

INVH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Invitation Homes Inc. reported a gross profit of 400.29M and revenue of 674.48M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.4%.

FANG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Diamondback Energy, Inc. reported an operating income of 17.00M and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.4%.

INVH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Invitation Homes Inc. reported an operating income of 187.63M and revenue of 674.48M, resulting in an operating margin of 27.8%.

FANG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Diamondback Energy, Inc. reported a net income of 1.41B and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in a net margin of 34.7%.

INVH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Invitation Homes Inc. reported a net income of 165.75M and revenue of 674.48M, resulting in a net margin of 24.6%.