PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FANG vs. INVH
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


FANGINVH
YTD Return32.22%6.76%
1Y Return40.08%9.68%
3Y Return (Ann)44.92%-1.29%
5Y Return (Ann)20.51%7.15%
Sharpe Ratio1.660.48
Daily Std Dev24.50%21.35%
Max Drawdown-88.72%-50.54%
Current Drawdown-5.35%-14.42%

Fundamentals


FANGINVH
Market Cap$35.19B$21.95B
EPS$19.53$0.78
PE Ratio10.1045.94
PEG Ratio1.2020.52
Total Revenue (TTM)$9.27B$2.56B
Gross Profit (TTM)$5.84B$1.18B
EBITDA (TTM)$6.51B$1.06B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.1

The correlation between FANG and INVH is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

FANG vs. INVH - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, FANG achieves a 32.22% return, which is significantly higher than INVH's 6.76% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


90.00%100.00%110.00%120.00%130.00%140.00%150.00%MarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugust
133.41%
112.20%
FANG
INVH

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Diamondback Energy, Inc.

Invitation Homes Inc.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FANG vs. INVH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) and Invitation Homes Inc. (INVH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FANG
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FANG, currently valued at 1.66, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.001.66
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FANG, currently valued at 2.43, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.43
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FANG, currently valued at 1.30, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.30
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FANG, currently valued at 3.32, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.003.32
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FANG, currently valued at 7.54, compared to the broader market-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.0025.007.54
INVH
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for INVH, currently valued at 0.48, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.000.48
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for INVH, currently valued at 0.81, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.81
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for INVH, currently valued at 1.10, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.10
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for INVH, currently valued at 0.30, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.000.30
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for INVH, currently valued at 1.89, compared to the broader market-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.0025.001.89

FANG vs. INVH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FANG Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is higher than the INVH Sharpe Ratio of 0.48. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of FANG and INVH.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.502.002.503.00MarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugust
1.66
0.48
FANG
INVH

Dividends

FANG vs. INVH - Dividend Comparison

FANG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.45%, more than INVH's 3.07% yield.


TTM2023202220212020201920182017
FANG
Diamondback Energy, Inc.
5.45%5.15%6.55%1.62%3.10%0.74%0.40%0.00%
INVH
Invitation Homes Inc.
3.07%3.87%2.97%1.50%2.02%1.74%2.19%0.93%

Drawdowns

FANG vs. INVH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FANG drawdown since its inception was -88.72%, which is greater than INVH's maximum drawdown of -50.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FANG and INVH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%MarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugust
-5.35%
-14.42%
FANG
INVH

Volatility

FANG vs. INVH - Volatility Comparison

Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) has a higher volatility of 9.14% compared to Invitation Homes Inc. (INVH) at 5.13%. This indicates that FANG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INVH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%MarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugust
9.14%
5.13%
FANG
INVH

Financials

FANG vs. INVH - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Diamondback Energy, Inc. and Invitation Homes Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items