PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FANG vs. INVH
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between FANG and INVH is 0.14, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.1

Performance

FANG vs. INVH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) and Invitation Homes Inc. (INVH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-17.63%
-9.76%
FANG
INVH

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FANG:

0.17

INVH:

-0.24

Sortino Ratio

FANG:

0.43

INVH:

-0.18

Omega Ratio

FANG:

1.05

INVH:

0.98

Calmar Ratio

FANG:

0.19

INVH:

-0.19

Martin Ratio

FANG:

0.53

INVH:

-0.90

Ulcer Index

FANG:

8.92%

INVH:

5.27%

Daily Std Dev

FANG:

28.13%

INVH:

19.99%

Max Drawdown

FANG:

-88.72%

INVH:

-50.54%

Current Drawdown

FANG:

-24.74%

INVH:

-23.90%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FANG:

$46.76B

INVH:

$20.30B

EPS

FANG:

$17.33

INVH:

$0.72

PE Ratio

FANG:

9.24

INVH:

46.01

PEG Ratio

FANG:

1.20

INVH:

15.34

Total Revenue (TTM)

FANG:

$9.57B

INVH:

$2.63B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FANG:

$6.02B

INVH:

$1.05B

EBITDA (TTM)

FANG:

$6.66B

INVH:

$1.85B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FANG achieves a 5.13% return, which is significantly higher than INVH's -5.07% return.


FANG

YTD

5.13%

1M

-14.19%

6M

-15.95%

1Y

3.74%

5Y*

17.21%

10Y*

12.14%

INVH

YTD

-5.07%

1M

-7.44%

6M

-10.11%

1Y

-5.56%

5Y*

4.04%

10Y*

N/A

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FANG vs. INVH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) and Invitation Homes Inc. (INVH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FANG, currently valued at 0.17, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.000.17-0.24
The chart of Sortino ratio for FANG, currently valued at 0.43, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.43-0.18
The chart of Omega ratio for FANG, currently valued at 1.05, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.050.98
The chart of Calmar ratio for FANG, currently valued at 0.19, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.19-0.19
The chart of Martin ratio for FANG, currently valued at 0.53, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.000.53-0.90
FANG
INVH

The current FANG Sharpe Ratio is 0.17, which is higher than the INVH Sharpe Ratio of -0.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FANG and INVH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.502.002.503.00JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
0.17
-0.24
FANG
INVH

Dividends

FANG vs. INVH - Dividend Comparison

FANG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.31%, more than INVH's 3.54% yield.


TTM2023202220212020201920182017
FANG
Diamondback Energy, Inc.
5.31%5.15%6.55%1.62%3.10%0.74%0.40%0.00%
INVH
Invitation Homes Inc.
3.54%3.87%2.97%1.50%2.02%1.74%2.19%0.93%

Drawdowns

FANG vs. INVH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FANG drawdown since its inception was -88.72%, which is greater than INVH's maximum drawdown of -50.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FANG and INVH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-24.74%
-23.90%
FANG
INVH

Volatility

FANG vs. INVH - Volatility Comparison

Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) has a higher volatility of 7.32% compared to Invitation Homes Inc. (INVH) at 4.48%. This indicates that FANG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INVH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
7.32%
4.48%
FANG
INVH

Financials

FANG vs. INVH - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Diamondback Energy, Inc. and Invitation Homes Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab