PortfoliosLab logo
FANG vs. GPC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between FANG and GPC is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

FANG vs. GPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) and Genuine Parts Company (GPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

200.00%400.00%600.00%800.00%1,000.00%1,200.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
897.81%
172.89%
FANG
GPC

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FANG:

-0.77

GPC:

-0.67

Sortino Ratio

FANG:

-0.92

GPC:

-0.70

Omega Ratio

FANG:

0.87

GPC:

0.89

Calmar Ratio

FANG:

-0.71

GPC:

-0.55

Martin Ratio

FANG:

-1.60

GPC:

-1.21

Ulcer Index

FANG:

18.72%

GPC:

18.04%

Daily Std Dev

FANG:

38.92%

GPC:

32.96%

Max Drawdown

FANG:

-88.72%

GPC:

-54.89%

Current Drawdown

FANG:

-33.05%

GPC:

-33.26%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FANG:

$39.14B

GPC:

$16.70B

EPS

FANG:

$16.08

GPC:

$6.09

PE Ratio

FANG:

8.28

GPC:

19.75

PEG Ratio

FANG:

1.20

GPC:

1.51

PS Ratio

FANG:

3.71

GPC:

0.70

PB Ratio

FANG:

1.07

GPC:

3.75

Total Revenue (TTM)

FANG:

$12.87B

GPC:

$23.57B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FANG:

$8.81B

GPC:

$8.52B

EBITDA (TTM)

FANG:

$8.98B

GPC:

$1.65B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FANG achieves a -15.24% return, which is significantly lower than GPC's 1.39% return. Over the past 10 years, FANG has outperformed GPC with an annualized return of 8.19%, while GPC has yielded a comparatively lower 5.23% annualized return.


FANG

YTD

-15.24%

1M

2.19%

6M

-23.27%

1Y

-29.99%

5Y*

32.57%

10Y*

8.19%

GPC

YTD

1.39%

1M

3.02%

6M

-2.50%

1Y

-22.07%

5Y*

12.07%

10Y*

5.23%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FANG vs. GPC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FANG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FANG is 1111
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FANG is 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FANG is 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FANG is 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FANG is 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FANG is 55
Martin Ratio Rank

GPC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GPC is 1717
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GPC is 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GPC is 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GPC is 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GPC is 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GPC is 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FANG vs. GPC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) and Genuine Parts Company (GPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current FANG Sharpe Ratio is -0.77, which is comparable to the GPC Sharpe Ratio of -0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FANG and GPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-0.77
-0.67
FANG
GPC

Dividends

FANG vs. GPC - Dividend Comparison

FANG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.50%, more than GPC's 3.43% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FANG
Diamondback Energy, Inc.
4.50%5.06%5.15%6.55%1.62%3.10%0.74%0.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GPC
Genuine Parts Company
3.43%3.43%2.74%2.06%2.33%3.15%2.87%3.00%2.84%2.75%2.86%2.16%

Drawdowns

FANG vs. GPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FANG drawdown since its inception was -88.72%, which is greater than GPC's maximum drawdown of -54.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FANG and GPC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-45.00%-40.00%-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-33.05%
-33.26%
FANG
GPC

Volatility

FANG vs. GPC - Volatility Comparison

Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) has a higher volatility of 15.41% compared to Genuine Parts Company (GPC) at 6.66%. This indicates that FANG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
15.41%
6.66%
FANG
GPC

Financials

FANG vs. GPC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Diamondback Energy, Inc. and Genuine Parts Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B20212022202320242025
4.05B
5.87B
(FANG) Total Revenue
(GPC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

FANG vs. GPC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Diamondback Energy, Inc. and Genuine Parts Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
91.6%
37.1%
(FANG) Gross Margin
(GPC) Gross Margin
FANG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Diamondback Energy, Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.71B and revenue of 4.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 91.6%.

GPC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Genuine Parts Company reported a gross profit of 2.17B and revenue of 5.87B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.1%.

FANG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Diamondback Energy, Inc. reported an operating income of 17.00M and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.4%.

GPC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Genuine Parts Company reported an operating income of 287.95M and revenue of 5.87B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.9%.

FANG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Diamondback Energy, Inc. reported a net income of 1.41B and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in a net margin of 34.7%.

GPC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Genuine Parts Company reported a net income of 194.39M and revenue of 5.87B, resulting in a net margin of 3.3%.