FANG vs. GPC
Compare and contrast key facts about Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) and Genuine Parts Company (GPC).
Performance
FANG vs. GPC - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FANG vs. GPC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FANG Diamondback Energy, Inc. | 27.56% | -5.64% | 10.35% | 19.66% | 35.34% | 127.51% | -46.00% | 0.92% | -26.35% | 24.93% |
GPC Genuine Parts Company | -13.68% | 8.70% | -13.22% | -18.12% | 26.82% | 43.39% | -2.19% | 14.05% | 4.11% | 2.45% |
Fundamentals
FANG:
$54.48B
GPC:
$14.61B
FANG:
$5.75
GPC:
$0.47
FANG:
33.15
GPC:
221.97
FANG:
3.68
GPC:
0.60
FANG:
1.47
GPC:
3.30
FANG:
$14.98B
GPC:
$24.30B
FANG:
$7.48B
GPC:
$8.94B
FANG:
$7.31B
GPC:
$753.70M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FANG achieves a 27.56% return, which is significantly higher than GPC's -13.68% return. Over the past 10 years, FANG has outperformed GPC with an annualized return of 12.44%, while GPC has yielded a comparatively lower 3.49% annualized return.
FANG
- 1D
- -3.63%
- 1M
- 7.15%
- YTD
- 27.56%
- 6M
- 34.51%
- 1Y
- 21.73%
- 3Y*
- 16.36%
- 5Y*
- 23.73%
- 10Y*
- 12.44%
GPC
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- -10.47%
- YTD
- -13.68%
- 6M
- -22.57%
- 1Y
- -8.26%
- 3Y*
- -11.74%
- 5Y*
- 0.72%
- 10Y*
- 3.49%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FANG vs. GPC — Risk / Return Rank
FANG
GPC
FANG vs. GPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) and Genuine Parts Company (GPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FANG | GPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.56 | -0.28 | +0.83 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.98 | -0.19 | +1.17 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 0.97 | +0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.86 | -0.25 | +1.11 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.18 | -0.81 | +2.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FANG | GPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 | -0.28 | +0.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 | 0.03 | +0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 | 0.13 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.38 | +0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between FANG and GPC is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FANG vs. GPC - Dividend Comparison
FANG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%, less than GPC's 3.95% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FANG Diamondback Energy, Inc. | 2.12% | 2.66% | 5.06% | 5.15% | 6.55% | 1.62% | 3.10% | 0.74% | 0.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GPC Genuine Parts Company | 3.95% | 3.35% | 3.43% | 2.74% | 2.06% | 2.33% | 3.15% | 2.87% | 3.00% | 2.84% | 2.75% | 2.86% |
Drawdowns
FANG vs. GPC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FANG drawdown since its inception was -88.72%, which is greater than GPC's maximum drawdown of -54.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FANG and GPC.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FANG | GPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.72% | -54.89% | -33.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.16% | -34.84% | +8.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.10% | -43.40% | +1.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -88.72% | -54.89% | -33.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.72% | -38.24% | +32.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.57% | -10.17% | -9.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.33% | 10.92% | -0.59% |
Volatility
FANG vs. GPC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) is 8.16%, while Genuine Parts Company (GPC) has a volatility of 8.73%. This indicates that FANG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FANG | GPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.16% | 8.73% | -0.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.91% | 23.36% | -2.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.22% | 29.91% | +9.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.39% | 26.62% | +11.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.95% | 27.93% | +21.02% |
Financials
FANG vs. GPC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Diamondback Energy, Inc. and Genuine Parts Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities