FANG vs. GPC

In the year-to-date period, FANG achieves a 22.52% return, which is significantly higher than GPC's -8.44% return. Over the past 10 years, FANG has outperformed GPC with an annualized return of 12.65%, while GPC has yielded a comparatively lower 4.98% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) and Genuine Parts Company (GPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current FANG Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is higher than the GPC Sharpe Ratio of -0.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FANG and GPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

FANG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.56%, more than GPC's 3.18% yield.

The maximum FANG drawdown since its inception was -88.72%, which is greater than GPC's maximum drawdown of -54.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FANG and GPC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) is 9.00%, while Genuine Parts Company (GPC) has a volatility of 25.44%. This indicates that FANG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Diamondback Energy, Inc. and Genuine Parts Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.