FALN vs. DIA
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF (FALN) and SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF (DIA).
FALN and DIA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FALN is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US High Yield Fallen Angel 3% Capped Index. It was launched on Jun 14, 2016. DIA is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones Industrial Average. It was launched on Jan 14, 1998. Both FALN and DIA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FALN or DIA.
Correlation
The correlation between FALN and DIA is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
FALN vs. DIA - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
FALN:
1.45
DIA:
1.30
FALN:
2.03
DIA:
1.88
FALN:
1.26
DIA:
1.24
FALN:
1.79
DIA:
2.42
FALN:
9.35
DIA:
7.19
FALN:
0.72%
DIA:
2.04%
FALN:
4.65%
DIA:
11.28%
FALN:
-29.22%
DIA:
-51.87%
FALN:
-2.04%
DIA:
-5.86%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FALN achieves a 7.05% return, which is significantly lower than DIA's 14.23% return.
FALN
7.05%
-0.93%
4.21%
6.80%
4.91%
N/A
DIA
14.23%
-1.92%
9.09%
16.10%
10.36%
11.28%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FALN vs. DIA - Expense Ratio Comparison
FALN has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than DIA's 0.16% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FALN vs. DIA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF (FALN) and SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF (DIA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FALN vs. DIA - Dividend Comparison
FALN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.27%, more than DIA's 1.32% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FALN iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF | 6.27% | 5.38% | 5.08% | 3.39% | 5.14% | 5.35% | 5.97% | 6.99% | 3.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DIA SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF | 1.32% | 1.81% | 1.91% | 1.58% | 1.87% | 2.09% | 2.24% | 1.97% | 2.26% | 2.33% | 2.02% | 2.08% |
Drawdowns
FALN vs. DIA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FALN drawdown since its inception was -29.22%, smaller than the maximum DIA drawdown of -51.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FALN and DIA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FALN vs. DIA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF (FALN) is 1.59%, while SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF (DIA) has a volatility of 3.62%. This indicates that FALN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DIA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.