PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FAIL vs. TAIL
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FAIL and TAIL is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.2

Performance

FAIL vs. TAIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cambria Global Tail Risk ETF (FAIL) and Cambria Tail Risk ETF (TAIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%2.00%4.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-3.32%
-6.38%
FAIL
TAIL

Key characteristics

Returns By Period


FAIL

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

TAIL

YTD

-0.11%

1M

1.70%

6M

-6.38%

1Y

-4.82%

5Y*

-9.12%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FAIL vs. TAIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAIL has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than TAIL's 0.59% expense ratio.


FAIL
Cambria Global Tail Risk ETF
Expense ratio chart for FAIL: current value at 0.63% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.63%
Expense ratio chart for TAIL: current value at 0.59% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.59%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FAIL vs. TAIL — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAIL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FAIL is 33
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FAIL is 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FAIL is 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FAIL is 22
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FAIL is 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FAIL is 33
Martin Ratio Rank

TAIL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of TAIL is 33
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of TAIL is 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of TAIL is 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of TAIL is 22
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of TAIL is 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of TAIL is 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FAIL vs. TAIL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Global Tail Risk ETF (FAIL) and Cambria Tail Risk ETF (TAIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FAIL, currently valued at -0.37, compared to the broader market0.002.004.00-0.37-0.51
The chart of Sortino ratio for FAIL, currently valued at -0.46, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.00-0.46-0.70
The chart of Omega ratio for FAIL, currently valued at 0.94, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.000.940.92
The chart of Calmar ratio for FAIL, currently valued at -0.10, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.00-0.10-0.12
The chart of Martin ratio for FAIL, currently valued at -0.75, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00-0.75-0.69
FAIL
TAIL


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.80-0.60-0.40-0.200.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-0.37
-0.51
FAIL
TAIL

Dividends

FAIL vs. TAIL - Dividend Comparison

FAIL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TAIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.48%.


TTM202420232022202120202019201820172016
FAIL
Cambria Global Tail Risk ETF
3.92%3.92%1.65%0.00%0.00%0.63%4.69%4.17%4.94%3.13%
TAIL
Cambria Tail Risk ETF
3.48%3.47%3.73%1.50%0.49%0.36%1.58%1.52%0.91%0.00%

Drawdowns

FAIL vs. TAIL - Drawdown Comparison


-50.00%-45.00%-40.00%-35.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-36.50%
-51.11%
FAIL
TAIL

Volatility

FAIL vs. TAIL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cambria Global Tail Risk ETF (FAIL) is 0.00%, while Cambria Tail Risk ETF (TAIL) has a volatility of 2.90%. This indicates that FAIL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TAIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February0
2.90%
FAIL
TAIL
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab