PortfoliosLab logo
FAIL vs. CAOS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FAIL and CAOS is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

FAIL vs. CAOS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cambria Global Tail Risk ETF (FAIL) and Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Returns By Period


FAIL

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

3Y*

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

CAOS

YTD

1.39%

1M

0.21%

6M

1.81%

1Y

5.28%

3Y*

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Cambria Global Tail Risk ETF

Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF

FAIL vs. CAOS - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FAIL and CAOS have an expense ratio of 0.63%.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FAIL vs. CAOS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAIL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FAIL is 33
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FAIL is 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FAIL is 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FAIL is 22
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FAIL is 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FAIL is 33
Martin Ratio Rank

CAOS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CAOS is 8282
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CAOS is 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CAOS is 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CAOS is 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CAOS is 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CAOS is 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FAIL vs. CAOS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Global Tail Risk ETF (FAIL) and Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

FAIL vs. CAOS - Dividend Comparison

Neither FAIL nor CAOS has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM202420232022202120202019201820172016
FAIL
Cambria Global Tail Risk ETF
1.63%3.92%1.65%0.00%0.00%0.63%4.69%4.17%4.94%3.13%
CAOS
Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FAIL vs. CAOS - Drawdown Comparison


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

FAIL vs. CAOS - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...