PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FAIL vs. CAOS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FAIL and CAOS is -0.14. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


-0.50.00.51.0-0.1

Performance

FAIL vs. CAOS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cambria Global Tail Risk ETF (FAIL) and Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-4.00%-3.00%-2.00%-1.00%0.00%1.00%2.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-3.36%
2.41%
FAIL
CAOS

Key characteristics

Returns By Period


FAIL

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

CAOS

YTD

0.31%

1M

0.16%

6M

2.40%

1Y

5.07%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FAIL vs. CAOS - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FAIL and CAOS have an expense ratio of 0.63%.


FAIL
Cambria Global Tail Risk ETF
Expense ratio chart for FAIL: current value at 0.63% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.63%
Expense ratio chart for CAOS: current value at 0.63% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.63%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FAIL vs. CAOS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAIL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FAIL is 33
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FAIL is 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FAIL is 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FAIL is 22
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FAIL is 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FAIL is 33
Martin Ratio Rank

CAOS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CAOS is 7474
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CAOS is 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CAOS is 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CAOS is 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CAOS is 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CAOS is 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FAIL vs. CAOS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Global Tail Risk ETF (FAIL) and Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FAIL, currently valued at -0.62, compared to the broader market0.002.004.00-0.621.63
The chart of Sortino ratio for FAIL, currently valued at -0.81, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00-0.812.54
The chart of Omega ratio for FAIL, currently valued at 0.89, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.000.891.55
The chart of Calmar ratio for FAIL, currently valued at -0.36, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.00-0.362.43
The chart of Martin ratio for FAIL, currently valued at -1.29, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00-1.297.56
FAIL
CAOS


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-0.62
1.63
FAIL
CAOS

Dividends

FAIL vs. CAOS - Dividend Comparison

Neither FAIL nor CAOS has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM202420232022202120202019201820172016
FAIL
Cambria Global Tail Risk ETF
3.92%3.92%1.65%0.00%0.00%0.63%4.69%4.17%4.94%3.13%
CAOS
Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FAIL vs. CAOS - Drawdown Comparison


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-16.06%
-0.06%
FAIL
CAOS

Volatility

FAIL vs. CAOS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cambria Global Tail Risk ETF (FAIL) is 0.00%, while Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS) has a volatility of 0.27%. This indicates that FAIL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CAOS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February0
0.27%
FAIL
CAOS
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab