PortfoliosLab logo
FAIL vs. BTAL
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FAIL and BTAL is -0.06. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Performance

FAIL vs. BTAL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cambria Global Tail Risk ETF (FAIL) and AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund (BTAL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Returns By Period


FAIL

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

3Y*

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

BTAL

YTD

4.17%

1M

-3.46%

6M

5.63%

1Y

3.38%

3Y*

1.82%

5Y*

-3.19%

10Y*

1.18%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Cambria Global Tail Risk ETF

FAIL vs. BTAL - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAIL has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is lower than BTAL's 2.11% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FAIL vs. BTAL — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAIL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FAIL is 33
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FAIL is 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FAIL is 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FAIL is 22
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FAIL is 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FAIL is 33
Martin Ratio Rank

BTAL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BTAL is 2525
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BTAL is 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BTAL is 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BTAL is 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BTAL is 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BTAL is 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FAIL vs. BTAL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Global Tail Risk ETF (FAIL) and AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund (BTAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

FAIL vs. BTAL - Dividend Comparison

FAIL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BTAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.35%.


TTM202420232022202120202019201820172016
FAIL
Cambria Global Tail Risk ETF
1.63%3.92%1.65%0.00%0.00%0.63%4.69%4.17%4.94%3.13%
BTAL
AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund
3.35%3.49%6.14%1.00%0.00%0.00%0.88%0.39%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FAIL vs. BTAL - Drawdown Comparison


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

FAIL vs. BTAL - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...