FAGCX vs. VONG
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class I (FAGCX) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG).
FAGCX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jul 3, 1995. VONG is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth Index. It was launched on Sep 20, 2010.
Performance
FAGCX vs. VONG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FAGCX vs. VONG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAGCX Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class I | -9.48% | 22.47% | 39.06% | 45.51% | -32.60% | 16.63% | 74.20% | 47.51% | 19.08% | 37.70% |
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF | -8.97% | 18.45% | 33.20% | 42.67% | -29.18% | 27.60% | 38.30% | 36.06% | -1.53% | 30.05% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FAGCX achieves a -9.48% return, which is significantly lower than VONG's -8.97% return. Over the past 10 years, FAGCX has outperformed VONG with an annualized return of 22.70%, while VONG has yielded a comparatively lower 16.75% annualized return.
FAGCX
- 1D
- 4.77%
- 1M
- -5.79%
- YTD
- -9.48%
- 6M
- -8.40%
- 1Y
- 23.02%
- 3Y*
- 25.13%
- 5Y*
- 10.36%
- 10Y*
- 22.70%
VONG
- 1D
- 0.91%
- 1M
- -4.62%
- YTD
- -8.97%
- 6M
- -8.47%
- 1Y
- 18.72%
- 3Y*
- 21.47%
- 5Y*
- 12.55%
- 10Y*
- 16.75%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FAGCX vs. VONG - Expense Ratio Comparison
FAGCX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than VONG's 0.06% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FAGCX vs. VONG — Risk / Return Rank
FAGCX
VONG
FAGCX vs. VONG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class I (FAGCX) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FAGCX | VONG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.00 | 0.84 | +0.16 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.53 | 1.36 | +0.17 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.19 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.48 | 1.22 | +0.26 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.36 | 4.16 | +1.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FAGCX | VONG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 | 0.84 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | 0.59 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.93 | 0.81 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.84 | -0.36 |
Correlation
The correlation between FAGCX and VONG is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FAGCX vs. VONG - Dividend Comparison
FAGCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.05%, more than VONG's 0.50% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAGCX Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class I | 4.05% | 3.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 11.34% | 14.14% | 7.31% | 7.69% | 14.30% | 8.00% | 15.78% | 16.11% |
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF | 0.50% | 0.45% | 0.55% | 0.71% | 0.98% | 0.58% | 0.77% | 1.03% | 1.18% | 1.19% | 1.48% | 1.47% |
Drawdowns
FAGCX vs. VONG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FAGCX drawdown since its inception was -69.09%, which is greater than VONG's maximum drawdown of -32.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAGCX and VONG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FAGCX | VONG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.09% | -32.72% | -36.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.10% | -16.23% | +0.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.72% | -32.72% | -6.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.72% | -32.72% | -6.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.10% | -12.29% | +0.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.84% | -4.90% | -13.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.46% | 4.78% | -0.32% |
Volatility
FAGCX vs. VONG - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class I (FAGCX) has a higher volatility of 8.51% compared to Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) at 6.81%. This indicates that FAGCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VONG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FAGCX | VONG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.51% | 6.81% | +1.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.81% | 12.37% | +2.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.42% | 22.42% | +2.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.44% | 21.35% | +4.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.42% | 20.82% | +3.60% |