FAGCX vs. HACAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class I (FAGCX) and Harbor Capital Appreciation Fund Class I (HACAX).
FAGCX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jul 3, 1995. HACAX is managed by Harbor. It was launched on Dec 29, 1987.
Performance
FAGCX vs. HACAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FAGCX vs. HACAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAGCX Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class I | -13.60% | 22.47% | 39.06% | 45.51% | -32.60% | 16.63% | 74.20% | 47.51% | 19.08% | 37.70% |
HACAX Harbor Capital Appreciation Fund Class I | -14.13% | 13.95% | 46.37% | 53.74% | -37.72% | 15.32% | 54.69% | 33.42% | -1.30% | 36.68% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FAGCX having a -13.60% return and HACAX slightly lower at -14.13%. Over the past 10 years, FAGCX has outperformed HACAX with an annualized return of 22.13%, while HACAX has yielded a comparatively lower 16.39% annualized return.
FAGCX
- 1D
- -1.17%
- 1M
- -9.93%
- YTD
- -13.60%
- 6M
- -12.22%
- 1Y
- 18.69%
- 3Y*
- 23.21%
- 5Y*
- 9.78%
- 10Y*
- 22.13%
HACAX
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- -8.90%
- YTD
- -14.13%
- 6M
- -13.44%
- 1Y
- 8.81%
- 3Y*
- 23.01%
- 5Y*
- 10.36%
- 10Y*
- 16.39%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FAGCX vs. HACAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FAGCX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than HACAX's 0.71% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FAGCX vs. HACAX — Risk / Return Rank
FAGCX
HACAX
FAGCX vs. HACAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class I (FAGCX) and Harbor Capital Appreciation Fund Class I (HACAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FAGCX | HACAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.77 | 0.43 | +0.34 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.21 | 0.71 | +0.50 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.10 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.95 | 0.32 | +0.63 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.49 | 1.07 | +2.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FAGCX | HACAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 | 0.43 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 | 0.40 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 | 0.68 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.59 | -0.11 |
Correlation
The correlation between FAGCX and HACAX is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FAGCX vs. HACAX - Dividend Comparison
FAGCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.25%, less than HACAX's 13.10% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAGCX Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class I | 4.25% | 3.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 11.34% | 14.14% | 7.31% | 7.69% | 14.30% | 8.00% | 15.78% | 16.11% |
HACAX Harbor Capital Appreciation Fund Class I | 13.10% | 11.25% | 21.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 18.64% | 12.25% | 8.88% | 10.97% | 11.56% | 6.26% | 6.83% |
Drawdowns
FAGCX vs. HACAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FAGCX drawdown since its inception was -69.09%, which is greater than HACAX's maximum drawdown of -63.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAGCX and HACAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FAGCX | HACAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.09% | -63.05% | -6.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.10% | -17.96% | +1.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.72% | -43.52% | +4.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.72% | -43.52% | +4.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.10% | -17.96% | +1.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.84% | -16.27% | -2.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.39% | 5.36% | -0.97% |
Volatility
FAGCX vs. HACAX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class I (FAGCX) has a higher volatility of 6.78% compared to Harbor Capital Appreciation Fund Class I (HACAX) at 5.67%. This indicates that FAGCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HACAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FAGCX | HACAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.78% | 5.67% | +1.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.04% | 12.59% | +1.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.02% | 20.13% | +3.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.36% | 25.89% | -0.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.38% | 24.31% | +0.07% |