FAGAX vs. DTGRX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class A (FAGAX) and BNY Mellon Technology Growth Fund (DTGRX).
FAGAX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Sep 3, 1996. DTGRX is managed by BNY Mellon. It was launched on Oct 12, 1997.
Performance
FAGAX vs. DTGRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FAGAX vs. DTGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAGAX Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class A | -9.54% | 22.17% | 38.71% | 45.14% | -38.40% | 11.31% | 68.60% | 40.26% | 14.87% | 34.66% |
DTGRX BNY Mellon Technology Growth Fund | -7.70% | 27.20% | 30.78% | 59.98% | -46.44% | 12.62% | 69.80% | 52.82% | -1.47% | 42.50% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FAGAX achieves a -9.54% return, which is significantly lower than DTGRX's -7.70% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FAGAX having a 19.20% annualized return and DTGRX not far behind at 18.88%.
FAGAX
- 1D
- 4.77%
- 1M
- -5.81%
- YTD
- -9.54%
- 6M
- -8.51%
- 1Y
- 22.71%
- 3Y*
- 24.82%
- 5Y*
- 7.91%
- 10Y*
- 19.20%
DTGRX
- 1D
- 4.35%
- 1M
- -6.78%
- YTD
- -7.70%
- 6M
- -6.42%
- 1Y
- 28.49%
- 3Y*
- 26.75%
- 5Y*
- 7.49%
- 10Y*
- 18.88%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FAGAX vs. DTGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FAGAX has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is lower than DTGRX's 1.16% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FAGAX vs. DTGRX — Risk / Return Rank
FAGAX
DTGRX
FAGAX vs. DTGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class A (FAGAX) and BNY Mellon Technology Growth Fund (DTGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FAGAX | DTGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.99 | 1.10 | -0.11 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.51 | 1.65 | -0.14 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.23 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.46 | 1.68 | -0.22 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.25 | 5.91 | -0.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FAGAX | DTGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 | 1.10 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | 0.26 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.81 | 0.68 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.40 | +0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between FAGAX and DTGRX is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FAGAX vs. DTGRX - Dividend Comparison
FAGAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.54%, less than DTGRX's 13.05% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAGAX Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class A | 4.54% | 4.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 10.19% | 5.45% | 4.10% | 11.99% | 7.67% | 15.44% | 11.12% |
DTGRX BNY Mellon Technology Growth Fund | 13.05% | 12.04% | 8.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 21.32% | 5.76% | 34.25% | 30.17% | 9.91% | 10.19% | 6.52% |
Drawdowns
FAGAX vs. DTGRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FAGAX drawdown since its inception was -65.24%, smaller than the maximum DTGRX drawdown of -83.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAGAX and DTGRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FAGAX | DTGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.24% | -83.23% | +17.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.19% | -17.27% | +1.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.70% | -52.92% | +8.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.70% | -52.92% | +8.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.20% | -13.67% | +1.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.27% | -38.97% | +23.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.49% | 4.91% | -0.42% |
Volatility
FAGAX vs. DTGRX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class A (FAGAX) and BNY Mellon Technology Growth Fund (DTGRX) have volatilities of 8.51% and 8.59%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FAGAX | DTGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.51% | 8.59% | -0.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.81% | 17.13% | -2.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.42% | 27.35% | -2.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.87% | 28.58% | -3.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.82% | 27.84% | -4.02% |