FAF vs. LRCX
FAF (First American Financial Corporation) and LRCX (Lam Research Corporation) are both stocks. FAF operates in Insurance - Specialty (Financial Services), while LRCX operates in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials (Technology). Over the past 10 years, FAF returned 9.95%/yr vs 43.17%/yr for LRCX. Their 0.32 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
FAF vs. LRCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FAF achieves a 24.75% return, which is significantly lower than LRCX's 72.43% return. Over the past 10 years, FAF has underperformed LRCX with an annualized return of 9.95%, while LRCX has yielded a comparatively higher 43.17% annualized return.
FAF
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- 8.52%
- 6M
- 19.86%
- YTD
- 24.75%
- 1Y
- 28.51%
- 3Y*
- 10.19%
- 5Y*
- 6.12%
- 10Y*
- 9.95%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.99%
LRCX
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- -16.16%
- 6M
- 24.28%
- YTD
- 72.43%
- 1Y
- 207.40%
- 3Y*
- 63.65%
- 5Y*
- 36.72%
- 10Y*
- 43.17%
- ALL TIME*
- 23.69%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $63.15M | $57.11M | $65.09M | |
| $3.70B | $3.64B | $3.95B |
FAF vs. LRCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAF First American Financial Corporation | 24.75% | 1.90% | 0.36% | 27.66% | -30.62% | 56.18% | -8.55% | 34.63% | -17.89% | 57.91% |
LRCX Lam Research Corporation | 72.43% | 139.16% | -6.84% | 88.63% | -40.72% | 53.66% | 64.18% | 119.33% | -24.40% | 76.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between FAF and LRCX is 0.00, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.28 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2010 | 0.32 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FAF and LRCX has dropped to 0.00 - well below their long-term average of 0.32, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
FAF:
$7.70B
LRCX:
$368.43B
FAF:
$7.21
LRCX:
$5.75
FAF:
10.46
LRCX:
51.23
FAF:
0.17
LRCX:
2.90
FAF:
0.98
LRCX:
16.02
FAF:
1.38
LRCX:
29.79
FAF:
$7.98B
LRCX:
$23.23B
FAF:
$3.21B
LRCX:
$11.73B
FAF:
$1.17B
LRCX:
$8.70B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FAF vs. LRCX — Risk / Return Rank
FAF
LRCX
FAF vs. LRCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First American Financial Corporation (FAF) and Lam Research Corporation (LRCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FAF | LRCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.42 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.55 | 5.00 | -3.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.42 | 20.68 | -16.26 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FAF vs. LRCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FAF drawdown since its inception was -50.13%, smaller than the maximum LRCX drawdown of -87.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAF and LRCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FAF | LRCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.13% | -87.90% | +37.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.46% | -41.76% | +23.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.13% | -47.10% | +24.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.65% | -56.39% | +12.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.13% | -56.39% | +6.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.75% | -32.01% | +27.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.16% | -28.13% | +14.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.46% | 10.08% | -3.62% |
Volatility
FAF vs. LRCX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First American Financial Corporation (FAF) is 11.83%, while Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) has a volatility of 25.56%. This indicates that FAF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LRCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FAF | LRCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.83% | 25.56% | -13.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.71% | 52.01% | -28.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.95% | 63.03% | -34.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.46% | 48.99% | -21.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.91% | 46.21% | -17.30% |
Dividends
FAF vs. LRCX - Dividend Comparison
FAF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.92%, more than LRCX's 0.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAF First American Financial Corporation | 2.92% | 3.55% | 3.43% | 3.26% | 3.94% | 2.48% | 3.45% | 2.88% | 3.58% | 2.57% | 3.28% | 2.79% |
LRCX Lam Research Corporation | 0.35% | 0.57% | 1.19% | 0.95% | 1.53% | 0.78% | 1.04% | 1.54% | 2.79% | 1.01% | 1.28% | 1.36% |
Financials
FAF vs. LRCX - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between First American Financial Corporation and Lam Research Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FAF vs. LRCX - Profitability Comparison
FAF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, First American Financial Corporation reported a gross profit of -65.50M and revenue of 3.81B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -1.7%.
LRCX - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lam Research Corporation reported a gross profit of 3.48B and revenue of 6.72B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.8%.
FAF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, First American Financial Corporation reported an operating income of -161.80M and revenue of 3.81B, resulting in an operating margin of -4.2%.
LRCX - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lam Research Corporation reported an operating income of 2.51B and revenue of 6.72B, resulting in an operating margin of 37.4%.
FAF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, First American Financial Corporation reported a net income of 218.50M and revenue of 3.81B, resulting in a net margin of 5.7%.
LRCX - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lam Research Corporation reported a net income of 2.28B and revenue of 6.72B, resulting in a net margin of 33.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
FAF and LRCX have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LRCX has higher volatility (25.56%) compared to FAF (11.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAF dropped -50.13% vs LRCX's -87.90%.
LRCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.32 vs 0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FAF and LRCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer