FAF vs. LRCX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

FAF (First American Financial Corporation) and LRCX (Lam Research Corporation) are both stocks. FAF operates in Insurance - Specialty (Financial Services), while LRCX operates in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials (Technology). Over the past 10 years, FAF returned 9.05%/yr vs 46.72%/yr for LRCX. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

FAF vs. LRCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First American Financial Corporation (FAF) and Lam Research Corporation (LRCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAF achieves a 6.99% return, which is significantly lower than LRCX's 95.59% return. Over the past 10 years, FAF has underperformed LRCX with an annualized return of 9.05%, while LRCX has yielded a comparatively higher 46.72% annualized return.

FAF

• 1D: 0.62%
• 1M: -4.85%
• YTD: 6.99%
• 6M: 1.92%
• 1Y: 22.39%
• 3Y*: 8.39%
• 5Y*: 3.86%
• 10Y*: 9.05%

LRCX

• 1D: 5.45%
• 1M: 30.26%
• YTD: 95.59%
• 6M: 112.00%
• 1Y: 308.41%
• 3Y*: 77.68%
• 5Y*: 40.87%
• 10Y*: 46.72%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FAF vs. LRCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FAF First American Financial Corporation	6.99%	1.90%	0.36%	27.66%	-30.62%	56.18%	-8.55%	34.63%	-17.89%	57.91%
LRCX Lam Research Corporation	95.59%	139.16%	-6.84%	88.63%	-40.72%	53.66%	64.18%	119.33%	-24.40%	76.21%

Correlation

The correlation between FAF and LRCX is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.12
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.18
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.31
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.31
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2010	0.33

Over the past year, the correlation between FAF and LRCX has dropped to 0.12 - well below their long-term average of 0.33, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap FAF : $6.74B LRCX : $422.29B
EPS FAF : $6.49 LRCX : $5.29
PE Ratio FAF : 10.04 LRCX : 63.24
PEG Ratio FAF : 0.16 LRCX : 4.79
PS Ratio FAF : 0.88 LRCX : 19.57
PB Ratio FAF : 1.23 LRCX : 39.90
Total Revenue (TTM) FAF : $7.71B LRCX : $21.68B
Gross Profit (TTM) FAF : $4.40B LRCX : $10.84B
EBITDA (TTM) FAF : $1.02B LRCX : $6.10B

Return for Risk

FAF vs. LRCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAF

FAF Risk / Return Rank: 62
FAF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
FAF Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
FAF Omega Ratio Rank: 57
FAF Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
FAF Martin Ratio Rank: 66

LRCX

LRCX Risk / Return Rank: 98
LRCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
LRCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
LRCX Omega Ratio Rank: 97
LRCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
LRCX Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAF vs. LRCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First American Financial Corporation (FAF) and Lam Research Corporation (LRCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FAF	LRCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.81	6.23	-5.42
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.21	5.00	-3.78
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.66	-0.51
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.13	15.84	-14.71
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.15	53.96	-50.81
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FAF vs. LRCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAF Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is lower than the LRCX Sharpe Ratio of 6.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAF and LRCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FAF	LRCX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81	6.23	-5.42
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.14	0.90	-0.75
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.32	1.05	-0.73
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.38	0.43	-0.05

Drawdowns

FAF vs. LRCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAF drawdown since its inception was -50.13%, smaller than the maximum LRCX drawdown of -87.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAF and LRCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FAF	LRCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.13%	-87.90%	+37.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.46%	-20.01%	+1.55%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.13%	-47.10%	+24.97%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-43.65%	-56.39%	+12.74%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-50.13%	-56.39%	+6.26%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.32%	0.00%	-8.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.26%	-28.19%	+14.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.65%	5.87%	+0.78%

Volatility

FAF vs. LRCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First American Financial Corporation (FAF) is 6.63%, while Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) has a volatility of 16.08%. This indicates that FAF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LRCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FAF	LRCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.63%	16.08%	-9.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.24%	40.17%	-18.93%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.65%	49.86%	-22.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.98%	45.94%	-18.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.62%	44.58%	-15.96%

Dividends

FAF vs. LRCX - Dividend Comparison

FAF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.36%, more than LRCX's 0.30% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FAF First American Financial Corporation	3.36%	3.55%	3.43%	3.26%	3.94%	2.48%	3.45%	2.88%	3.58%	2.57%	3.28%	2.79%
LRCX Lam Research Corporation	0.30%	0.57%	1.19%	0.95%	1.53%	0.78%	1.04%	1.54%	2.79%	1.01%	1.28%	1.36%

Financials

FAF vs. LRCX - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between First American Financial Corporation and Lam Research Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

FAF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, First American Financial Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

LRCX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lam Research Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.91B and revenue of 5.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.8%.

FAF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, First American Financial Corporation reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 1.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

LRCX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lam Research Corporation reported an operating income of 2.05B and revenue of 5.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 35.0%.

FAF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, First American Financial Corporation reported a net income of 125.10M and revenue of 1.84B, resulting in a net margin of 6.8%.

LRCX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lam Research Corporation reported a net income of 1.83B and revenue of 5.84B, resulting in a net margin of 31.3%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FAF and LRCX in my portfolio?

FAF and LRCX have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FAF or LRCX?

LRCX has higher volatility (16.08%) compared to FAF (6.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAF dropped -50.13% vs LRCX's -87.90%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LRCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.23 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.