PortfoliosLab logo
FAF vs. LRCX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between FAF and LRCX is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

FAF vs. LRCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First American Financial Corporation (FAF) and Lam Research Corporation (LRCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FAF:

0.39

LRCX:

-0.11

Sortino Ratio

FAF:

0.72

LRCX:

0.20

Omega Ratio

FAF:

1.09

LRCX:

1.03

Calmar Ratio

FAF:

0.33

LRCX:

-0.13

Martin Ratio

FAF:

1.26

LRCX:

-0.22

Ulcer Index

FAF:

7.60%

LRCX:

28.51%

Daily Std Dev

FAF:

23.98%

LRCX:

52.65%

Max Drawdown

FAF:

-50.13%

LRCX:

-87.91%

Current Drawdown

FAF:

-17.40%

LRCX:

-23.93%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FAF:

$6.18B

LRCX:

$109.04B

EPS

FAF:

$1.52

LRCX:

$3.59

PE Ratio

FAF:

39.51

LRCX:

23.75

PEG Ratio

FAF:

2.04

LRCX:

1.25

PS Ratio

FAF:

0.98

LRCX:

6.36

PB Ratio

FAF:

1.24

LRCX:

11.47

Total Revenue (TTM)

FAF:

$4.58B

LRCX:

$17.14B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FAF:

$6.00B

LRCX:

$8.24B

EBITDA (TTM)

FAF:

$282.20M

LRCX:

$5.83B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAF achieves a -4.22% return, which is significantly lower than LRCX's 17.99% return. Over the past 10 years, FAF has underperformed LRCX with an annualized return of 8.70%, while LRCX has yielded a comparatively higher 28.81% annualized return.


FAF

YTD

-4.22%

1M

-2.74%

6M

-6.06%

1Y

9.27%

5Y*

9.64%

10Y*

8.70%

LRCX

YTD

17.99%

1M

25.21%

6M

15.76%

1Y

-5.86%

5Y*

29.18%

10Y*

28.81%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FAF vs. LRCX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FAF is 6363
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FAF is 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FAF is 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FAF is 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FAF is 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FAF is 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

LRCX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LRCX is 4343
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LRCX is 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LRCX is 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LRCX is 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LRCX is 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LRCX is 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FAF vs. LRCX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First American Financial Corporation (FAF) and Lam Research Corporation (LRCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current FAF Sharpe Ratio is 0.39, which is higher than the LRCX Sharpe Ratio of -0.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAF and LRCX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

FAF vs. LRCX - Dividend Comparison

FAF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.63%, more than LRCX's 1.05% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FAF
First American Financial Corporation
3.63%3.43%3.26%3.94%2.48%3.45%2.88%3.58%2.57%3.28%2.79%2.48%
LRCX
Lam Research Corporation
1.05%1.19%0.95%1.53%0.78%1.04%1.54%2.79%1.01%1.28%1.36%0.68%

Drawdowns

FAF vs. LRCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAF drawdown since its inception was -50.13%, smaller than the maximum LRCX drawdown of -87.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAF and LRCX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

FAF vs. LRCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First American Financial Corporation (FAF) is 8.95%, while Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) has a volatility of 14.14%. This indicates that FAF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LRCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

FAF vs. LRCX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between First American Financial Corporation and Lam Research Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B20212022202320242025
135.20M
4.72B
(FAF) Total Revenue
(LRCX) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items