PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FAF vs. HIG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FAF vs. HIG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First American Financial Corporation (FAF) and The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. (HIG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAF achieves a 24.07% return, which is significantly higher than HIG's 3.91% return. Over the past 10 years, FAF has underperformed HIG with an annualized return of 9.81%, while HIG has yielded a comparatively higher 15.92% annualized return.


FAF

1D
-0.71%
1M
7.93%
6M
20.66%
YTD
24.07%
1Y
27.81%
3Y*
9.81%
5Y*
5.79%
10Y*
9.81%
ALL TIME*
11.95%

HIG

1D
-0.80%
1M
2.95%
6M
6.02%
YTD
3.91%
1Y
17.39%
3Y*
27.73%
5Y*
19.79%
10Y*
15.92%
ALL TIME*
8.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$65.16M$58.78M$64.81M
$261.78M$236.14M$236.36M

FAF vs. HIG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FAF
First American Financial Corporation
24.07%1.90%0.36%27.66%-30.62%56.18%-8.55%34.63%-17.89%57.91%
HIG
The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc.
3.91%28.09%38.54%8.55%12.31%44.23%-16.98%39.71%-19.24%20.25%

Correlation

The correlation between FAF and HIG is 0.44, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.48

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2010

0.46

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FAF:

$7.66B

HIG:

$38.90B

EPS

FAF:

$7.21

HIG:

$20.54

PE Ratio

FAF:

10.40

HIG:

6.91

PEG Ratio

FAF:

0.17

HIG:

0.32

PS Ratio

FAF:

0.97

HIG:

1.04

Total Revenue (TTM)

FAF:

$7.98B

HIG:

$29.03B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FAF:

$3.21B

HIG:

$10.25B

EBITDA (TTM)

FAF:

$1.17B

HIG:

$4.26B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FAF vs. HIG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FAF
FAF Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
FAF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAF Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
FAF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAF Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

HIG
HIG Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
HIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIG Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
HIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIG Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FAF vs. HIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First American Financial Corporation (FAF) and The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. (HIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FAFHIGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.15

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.58

1.41

+0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.52

3.44

+1.08

FAF vs. HIG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAF Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is comparable to the HIG Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAF and HIG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FAF vs. HIG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAF drawdown since its inception was -50.13%, smaller than the maximum HIG drawdown of -96.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAF and HIG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FAFHIGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.13%

-96.25%

+46.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.46%

-11.46%

-7.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.13%

-13.72%

-8.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.65%

-18.63%

-25.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.13%

-57.59%

+7.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.27%

-2.59%

-2.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.16%

-30.72%

+17.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.45%

4.68%

+1.77%

Volatility

FAF vs. HIG - Volatility Comparison

First American Financial Corporation (FAF) has a higher volatility of 11.96% compared to The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. (HIG) at 7.06%. This indicates that FAF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HIG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FAFHIGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.96%

7.06%

+4.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.76%

15.01%

+8.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.90%

19.29%

+9.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.45%

21.91%

+5.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.91%

28.92%

-0.01%

Dividends

FAF vs. HIG - Dividend Comparison

FAF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.93%, more than HIG's 1.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FAF
First American Financial Corporation
2.93%3.55%3.43%3.26%3.94%2.48%3.45%2.88%3.58%2.57%3.28%2.79%
HIG
The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc.
1.63%1.57%1.76%2.17%2.08%2.08%2.65%1.97%2.47%1.67%1.80%1.79%

Financials

FAF vs. HIG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between First American Financial Corporation and The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

FAF vs. HIG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between First American Financial Corporation and The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

FAF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, First American Financial Corporation reported a gross profit of -65.50M and revenue of 3.81B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -1.7%.

HIG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 7.26B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

FAF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, First American Financial Corporation reported an operating income of -161.80M and revenue of 3.81B, resulting in an operating margin of -4.2%.

HIG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 7.26B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

FAF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, First American Financial Corporation reported a net income of 218.50M and revenue of 3.81B, resulting in a net margin of 5.7%.

HIG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. reported a net income of 1.30B and revenue of 7.26B, resulting in a net margin of 17.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


FAF and HIG have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FAF has higher volatility (11.96%) compared to HIG (7.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAF dropped -50.13% vs HIG's -96.25%.

FAF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.01 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FAF and HIG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer