PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FADTX vs. XLK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FADTX vs. XLK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class A (FADTX) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


FADTX

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XLK

1D
-1.00%
1M
21.09%
YTD
36.47%
6M
35.71%
1Y
66.93%
3Y*
33.90%
5Y*
23.83%
10Y*
25.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FADTX vs. XLK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FADTX
Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class A
0.00%24.35%35.02%59.29%-36.17%27.26%63.93%50.57%-8.52%49.42%
XLK
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF
36.47%24.61%21.63%56.02%-27.73%34.74%43.62%49.86%-1.68%34.26%

Correlation

The correlation between FADTX and XLK is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 1998

0.92

Over the past year, the correlation between FADTX and XLK has dropped to 0.51 - well below their long-term average of 0.92, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FADTX vs. XLK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FADTX
XLK

Technology

97.9%
99.7%

Consumer Cyclical

1.2%

-

Communication Services

0.8%

-

Basic Materials

0.0%

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

0.2%

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

0.1%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

FADTX
97.9%
XLK
99.7%

Consumer Cyclical

FADTX
1.2%
XLK

-

Communication Services

FADTX
0.8%
XLK

-

Basic Materials

FADTX
0.0%
XLK

-

Consumer Defensive

FADTX

-

XLK

-

Energy

FADTX

-

XLK
0.2%

Financial Services

FADTX

-

XLK

-

Healthcare

FADTX

-

XLK

-

Industrials

FADTX

-

XLK
0.1%

Real Estate

FADTX

-

XLK

-

Utilities

FADTX

-

XLK

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FADTX vs. XLK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FADTX

XLK
XLK Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
XLK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLK Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLK Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
XLK Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLK Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FADTX vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class A (FADTX) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FADTX vs. XLK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FADTXXLKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

Drawdowns

FADTX vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FADTXXLKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.74%

Volatility

FADTX vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FADTXXLKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.49%

FADTX vs. XLK - Expense Ratio Comparison

FADTX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than XLK's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

FADTX vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison

FADTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.13%, more than XLK's 0.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FADTX
Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class A
11.13%11.13%8.01%3.94%3.72%12.63%7.85%2.52%23.98%8.23%1.63%4.55%
XLK
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF
0.39%0.54%0.66%0.76%1.04%0.65%0.92%1.16%1.60%1.37%1.74%1.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


FADTX and XLK have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FADTX and XLK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer