PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FADTX vs. BKLC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FADTX vs. BKLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class A (FADTX) and BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF (BKLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


FADTX

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BKLC

1D
0.46%
1M
4.81%
YTD
11.44%
6M
11.29%
1Y
28.60%
3Y*
23.48%
5Y*
14.43%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FADTX vs. BKLC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FADTX
Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class A
0.00%24.35%35.02%59.29%-36.17%27.26%76.01%
BKLC
BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF
11.44%18.06%25.56%30.88%-20.52%27.41%37.38%

Correlation

The correlation between FADTX and BKLC is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 13, 2020

0.84

Over the past year, the correlation between FADTX and BKLC has dropped to 0.48 - well below their long-term average of 0.84, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FADTX vs. BKLC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FADTX
BKLC

Technology

97.9%
38.0%

Consumer Cyclical

1.2%
9.8%

Communication Services

0.8%
10.8%

Basic Materials

0.0%
1.6%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.4%

Energy

-

3.3%

Financial Services

-

10.9%

Healthcare

-

8.3%

Industrials

-

7.8%

Real Estate

-

1.7%

Utilities

-

2.5%

Technology

FADTX
97.9%
BKLC
38.0%

Consumer Cyclical

FADTX
1.2%
BKLC
9.8%

Communication Services

FADTX
0.8%
BKLC
10.8%

Basic Materials

FADTX
0.0%
BKLC
1.6%

Consumer Defensive

FADTX

-

BKLC
4.4%

Energy

FADTX

-

BKLC
3.3%

Financial Services

FADTX

-

BKLC
10.9%

Healthcare

FADTX

-

BKLC
8.3%

Industrials

FADTX

-

BKLC
7.8%

Real Estate

FADTX

-

BKLC
1.7%

Utilities

FADTX

-

BKLC
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FADTX vs. BKLC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FADTX

BKLC
BKLC Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
BKLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKLC Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
BKLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKLC Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FADTX vs. BKLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class A (FADTX) and BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF (BKLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FADTX vs. BKLC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FADTXBKLCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.13

Drawdowns

FADTX vs. BKLC - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FADTXBKLCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.99%

Volatility

FADTX vs. BKLC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FADTXBKLCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.44%

FADTX vs. BKLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

FADTX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than BKLC's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

FADTX vs. BKLC - Dividend Comparison

FADTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.13%, more than BKLC's 1.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BKLC
BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF
1.01%1.05%1.22%1.35%1.64%1.10%0.84%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FADTX
Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class A
11.13%11.13%8.01%3.94%3.72%12.63%7.85%2.52%23.98%8.23%1.63%4.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


FADTX and BKLC have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FADTX and BKLC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer