FADAX vs. XLV
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Dividend Growth Fund Class A (FADAX) and Health Care Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLV).
FADAX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 28, 1998. XLV is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Health Care Select Sector. It was launched on Dec 16, 1998.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FADAX or XLV.
Performance
FADAX vs. XLV - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FADAX achieves a 29.63% return, which is significantly higher than XLV's 6.80% return. Over the past 10 years, FADAX has underperformed XLV with an annualized return of 4.65%, while XLV has yielded a comparatively higher 9.46% annualized return.
FADAX
29.63%
1.88%
10.53%
34.34%
8.41%
4.65%
XLV
6.80%
-4.69%
0.15%
12.17%
9.84%
9.46%
Key characteristics
| FADAX | XLV | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.44 | 1.17 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.27 | 1.66 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.45 | 1.21 |
| Calmar Ratio | 2.45 | 1.29 |
| Martin Ratio | 15.50 | 4.56 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.25% | 2.79% |
| Daily Std Dev | 14.32% | 10.84% |
| Max Drawdown | -61.17% | -39.18% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.71% | -8.06% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FADAX vs. XLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
FADAX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is higher than XLV's 0.12% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between FADAX and XLV is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FADAX vs. XLV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Dividend Growth Fund Class A (FADAX) and Health Care Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FADAX vs. XLV - Dividend Comparison
FADAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, less than XLV's 1.58% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FADAX Fidelity Advisor Dividend Growth Fund Class A | 0.85% | 1.14% | 1.46% | 0.66% | 1.43% | 1.48% | 1.97% | 1.46% | 1.21% | 1.14% | 12.85% | 0.51% |
XLV Health Care Select Sector SPDR Fund | 1.58% | 1.59% | 1.47% | 1.33% | 1.49% | 2.17% | 1.58% | 1.47% | 1.60% | 1.43% | 1.35% | 1.52% |
Drawdowns
FADAX vs. XLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FADAX drawdown since its inception was -61.17%, which is greater than XLV's maximum drawdown of -39.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FADAX and XLV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FADAX vs. XLV - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Dividend Growth Fund Class A (FADAX) has a higher volatility of 4.33% compared to Health Care Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLV) at 3.80%. This indicates that FADAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.