FADAX vs. VIS
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Dividend Growth Fund Class A (FADAX) and Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS).
FADAX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 28, 1998. VIS is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI US Investable Market Industrials 25/50 Index. It was launched on Sep 23, 2004.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FADAX or VIS.
Performance
FADAX vs. VIS - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FADAX achieves a 28.54% return, which is significantly higher than VIS's 23.36% return. Over the past 10 years, FADAX has underperformed VIS with an annualized return of 4.59%, while VIS has yielded a comparatively higher 11.47% annualized return.
FADAX
28.54%
0.98%
9.40%
33.81%
8.23%
4.59%
VIS
23.36%
1.31%
11.75%
34.71%
13.59%
11.47%
Key characteristics
FADAX | VIS | |
---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio | 2.33 | 2.38 |
Sortino Ratio | 3.15 | 3.34 |
Omega Ratio | 1.43 | 1.42 |
Calmar Ratio | 2.32 | 5.08 |
Martin Ratio | 14.80 | 15.55 |
Ulcer Index | 2.25% | 2.22% |
Daily Std Dev | 14.31% | 14.48% |
Max Drawdown | -61.17% | -63.51% |
Current Drawdown | -1.54% | -2.94% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FADAX vs. VIS - Expense Ratio Comparison
FADAX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is higher than VIS's 0.10% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between FADAX and VIS is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FADAX vs. VIS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Dividend Growth Fund Class A (FADAX) and Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FADAX vs. VIS - Dividend Comparison
FADAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, less than VIS's 1.18% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fidelity Advisor Dividend Growth Fund Class A | 0.86% | 1.14% | 1.46% | 0.66% | 1.43% | 1.48% | 1.97% | 1.46% | 1.21% | 1.14% | 12.85% | 0.51% |
Vanguard Industrials ETF | 1.18% | 1.36% | 1.52% | 1.11% | 1.38% | 1.69% | 1.91% | 1.60% | 1.81% | 1.94% | 1.57% | 1.06% |
Drawdowns
FADAX vs. VIS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FADAX drawdown since its inception was -61.17%, roughly equal to the maximum VIS drawdown of -63.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FADAX and VIS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FADAX vs. VIS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Dividend Growth Fund Class A (FADAX) is 4.40%, while Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS) has a volatility of 5.44%. This indicates that FADAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.