PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FAD vs. SPYG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FAD vs. SPYG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Multi Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FAD) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAD achieves a 22.02% return, which is significantly higher than SPYG's 11.38% return. Over the past 10 years, FAD has underperformed SPYG with an annualized return of 15.21%, while SPYG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.34% annualized return.


FAD

1D
1.04%
1M
7.38%
YTD
22.02%
6M
18.82%
1Y
40.18%
3Y*
25.41%
5Y*
11.39%
10Y*
15.21%

SPYG

1D
-0.71%
1M
0.34%
YTD
11.38%
6M
11.00%
1Y
31.61%
3Y*
26.51%
5Y*
14.78%
10Y*
18.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FAD vs. SPYG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FAD
First Trust Multi Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund
22.02%17.23%23.85%19.07%-24.06%21.17%34.92%26.66%-6.45%25.75%
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
11.38%22.09%35.99%30.02%-29.41%32.01%33.46%30.84%-0.12%27.24%

Correlation

The correlation between FAD and SPYG is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2007

0.80

The correlation between FAD and SPYG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

FAD vs. SPYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FAD
SPYG

Technology

27.4%
52.1%

Industrials

25.0%
5.4%

Healthcare

14.8%
5.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
8.5%

Financial Services

7.8%
9.0%

Real Estate

3.9%
0.6%

Communication Services

3.1%
15.9%

Basic Materials

2.9%
0.3%

Consumer Defensive

2.2%
1.0%

Utilities

1.5%
1.2%

Energy

1.3%
0.1%

Technology

FAD
27.4%
SPYG
52.1%

Industrials

FAD
25.0%
SPYG
5.4%

Healthcare

FAD
14.8%
SPYG
5.9%

Consumer Cyclical

FAD
10.1%
SPYG
8.5%

Financial Services

FAD
7.8%
SPYG
9.0%

Real Estate

FAD
3.9%
SPYG
0.6%

Communication Services

FAD
3.1%
SPYG
15.9%

Basic Materials

FAD
2.9%
SPYG
0.3%

Consumer Defensive

FAD
2.2%
SPYG
1.0%

Utilities

FAD
1.5%
SPYG
1.2%

Energy

FAD
1.3%
SPYG
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FAD vs. SPYG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAD
FAD Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
FAD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAD Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
FAD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAD Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYG
SPYG Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
SPYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYG Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYG Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAD vs. SPYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Multi Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FAD) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FADSPYGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.33

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.79

2.31

+1.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.43

9.21

+5.22

FAD vs. SPYG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAD Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is comparable to the SPYG Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAD and SPYG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FAD vs. SPYG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAD drawdown since its inception was -54.33%, smaller than the maximum SPYG drawdown of -67.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAD and SPYG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FADSPYGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.33%

-67.63%

+13.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.66%

-13.76%

+3.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.55%

-22.14%

-1.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.99%

-32.67%

+0.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.25%

-32.67%

-4.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.19%

+3.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.62%

-24.28%

+14.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.79%

3.44%

-0.65%

Volatility

FAD vs. SPYG - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Multi Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FAD) has a higher volatility of 7.37% compared to State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) at 6.83%. This indicates that FAD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FADSPYGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.37%

6.83%

+0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.27%

13.72%

+1.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.54%

17.11%

+2.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.72%

21.34%

-0.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.29%

20.74%

+0.55%

FAD vs. SPYG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAD has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYG's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

FAD vs. SPYG - Dividend Comparison

FAD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, less than SPYG's 0.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FAD
First Trust Multi Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund
0.09%0.09%0.59%0.51%0.60%0.09%0.32%0.48%0.20%0.22%0.64%0.41%
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
0.60%0.52%0.60%1.15%1.03%0.62%0.90%1.37%1.51%1.41%1.55%1.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


FAD and SPYG have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FAD has higher volatility (7.37%) compared to SPYG (6.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAD dropped -54.33% vs SPYG's -67.63%.

On 10-year performance, SPYG leads with 18.34% vs 15.21% for FAD. On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SPYG has been the lower-risk option at 6.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPYG has performed better with a 18.34% return vs 15.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for FAD.

SPYG has the higher dividend yield at 0.60%, compared with 0.09% for FAD.

FAD is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while SPYG is S&P 500. FAD tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Multi Cap Growth Index, while SPYG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for FAD and 0.04% for SPYG.

FAD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FAD and SPYG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer