PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FAD vs. SCHG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FAD and SCHG is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.8

Performance

FAD vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Multi Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FAD) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
17.11%
13.40%
FAD
SCHG

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FAD:

1.59

SCHG:

1.64

Sortino Ratio

FAD:

2.19

SCHG:

2.19

Omega Ratio

FAD:

1.28

SCHG:

1.30

Calmar Ratio

FAD:

2.25

SCHG:

2.37

Martin Ratio

FAD:

8.11

SCHG:

8.97

Ulcer Index

FAD:

3.23%

SCHG:

3.27%

Daily Std Dev

FAD:

16.38%

SCHG:

17.97%

Max Drawdown

FAD:

-54.33%

SCHG:

-34.59%

Current Drawdown

FAD:

-1.55%

SCHG:

-0.65%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAD achieves a 6.84% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 3.73% return. Over the past 10 years, FAD has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 11.85%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 16.52% annualized return.


FAD

YTD

6.84%

1M

2.90%

6M

17.11%

1Y

25.69%

5Y*

12.78%

10Y*

11.85%

SCHG

YTD

3.73%

1M

2.19%

6M

13.40%

1Y

30.16%

5Y*

18.57%

10Y*

16.52%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FAD vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAD has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.


FAD
First Trust Multi Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund
Expense ratio chart for FAD: current value at 0.63% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.63%
Expense ratio chart for SCHG: current value at 0.04% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.04%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FAD vs. SCHG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FAD is 6464
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FAD is 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FAD is 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FAD is 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FAD is 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FAD is 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SCHG is 6767
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SCHG is 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SCHG is 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SCHG is 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SCHG is 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SCHG is 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FAD vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Multi Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FAD) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FAD, currently valued at 1.59, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.591.64
The chart of Sortino ratio for FAD, currently valued at 2.19, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.002.192.19
The chart of Omega ratio for FAD, currently valued at 1.28, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.281.30
The chart of Calmar ratio for FAD, currently valued at 2.25, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.002.252.37
The chart of Martin ratio for FAD, currently valued at 8.11, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.008.118.97
FAD
SCHG

The current FAD Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is comparable to the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAD and SCHG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
1.59
1.64
FAD
SCHG

Dividends

FAD vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

FAD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, more than SCHG's 0.38% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FAD
First Trust Multi Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund
0.55%0.59%0.51%0.60%0.09%0.32%0.48%0.20%0.22%0.64%0.41%0.44%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.38%0.40%0.46%0.55%0.42%0.52%0.82%1.27%1.01%1.04%1.22%1.09%

Drawdowns

FAD vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAD drawdown since its inception was -54.33%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAD and SCHG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-1.55%
-0.65%
FAD
SCHG

Volatility

FAD vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Multi Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FAD) is 4.39%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a volatility of 5.13%. This indicates that FAD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
4.39%
5.13%
FAD
SCHG
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab