FAD vs. FNCMX
Compare and contrast key facts about First Trust Multi Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FAD) and Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund (FNCMX).
FAD is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ AlphaDEX Multi Cap Growth Index. It was launched on May 8, 2007. FNCMX is managed by Fidelity.
Performance
FAD vs. FNCMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FAD vs. FNCMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAD First Trust Multi Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund | -1.80% | 17.23% | 23.85% | 19.07% | -24.06% | 21.17% | 34.92% | 26.66% | -6.45% | 25.75% |
FNCMX Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund | -10.43% | 21.11% | 29.48% | 45.13% | -32.40% | 22.21% | 44.57% | 36.63% | -3.07% | 28.35% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FAD achieves a -1.80% return, which is significantly higher than FNCMX's -10.43% return. Over the past 10 years, FAD has underperformed FNCMX with an annualized return of 12.73%, while FNCMX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.42% annualized return.
FAD
- 1D
- 3.83%
- 1M
- -5.64%
- YTD
- -1.80%
- 6M
- -0.99%
- 1Y
- 22.98%
- 3Y*
- 17.93%
- 5Y*
- 8.03%
- 10Y*
- 12.73%
FNCMX
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- -8.22%
- YTD
- -10.43%
- 6M
- -8.01%
- 1Y
- 20.91%
- 3Y*
- 20.31%
- 5Y*
- 10.35%
- 10Y*
- 16.42%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FAD vs. FNCMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FAD has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than FNCMX's 0.29% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FAD vs. FNCMX — Risk / Return Rank
FAD
FNCMX
FAD vs. FNCMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Multi Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FAD) and Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund (FNCMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FAD | FNCMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.05 | 0.91 | +0.15 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.55 | 1.44 | +0.11 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.20 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.78 | 1.32 | +0.46 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.13 | 4.92 | +2.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FAD | FNCMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.05 | 0.91 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 | 0.46 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | 0.75 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.52 | -0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between FAD and FNCMX is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FAD vs. FNCMX - Dividend Comparison
FAD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than FNCMX's 0.57% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAD First Trust Multi Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund | 0.11% | 0.09% | 0.59% | 0.51% | 0.60% | 0.09% | 0.32% | 0.48% | 0.20% | 0.22% | 0.64% | 0.41% |
FNCMX Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund | 0.57% | 0.51% | 0.61% | 0.67% | 0.88% | 0.47% | 0.67% | 4.41% | 1.93% | 0.03% | 1.01% | 1.50% |
Drawdowns
FAD vs. FNCMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FAD drawdown since its inception was -54.33%, roughly equal to the maximum FNCMX drawdown of -55.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAD and FNCMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FAD | FNCMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.33% | -55.08% | +0.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.08% | -13.25% | +0.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.99% | -35.64% | +3.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.25% | -35.64% | -1.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.24% | -13.01% | +5.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.72% | -7.91% | -1.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.26% | 3.56% | -0.30% |
Volatility
FAD vs. FNCMX - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Multi Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FAD) has a higher volatility of 7.87% compared to Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund (FNCMX) at 5.63%. This indicates that FAD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNCMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FAD | FNCMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.87% | 5.63% | +2.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.67% | 12.48% | +2.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.90% | 23.06% | -1.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.50% | 22.42% | -1.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.07% | 21.97% | -0.90% |