PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FAD vs. FNCMX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FAD and FNCMX is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.8

Performance

FAD vs. FNCMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Multi Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FAD) and Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund (FNCMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
14.98%
11.89%
FAD
FNCMX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FAD:

1.56

FNCMX:

1.84

Sortino Ratio

FAD:

2.15

FNCMX:

2.41

Omega Ratio

FAD:

1.27

FNCMX:

1.33

Calmar Ratio

FAD:

1.59

FNCMX:

2.51

Martin Ratio

FAD:

9.50

FNCMX:

9.34

Ulcer Index

FAD:

2.74%

FNCMX:

3.53%

Daily Std Dev

FAD:

16.68%

FNCMX:

17.95%

Max Drawdown

FAD:

-54.33%

FNCMX:

-55.71%

Current Drawdown

FAD:

-6.45%

FNCMX:

-2.03%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAD achieves a 25.74% return, which is significantly lower than FNCMX's 32.52% return. Over the past 10 years, FAD has underperformed FNCMX with an annualized return of 11.52%, while FNCMX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.67% annualized return.


FAD

YTD

25.74%

1M

-5.24%

6M

15.13%

1Y

25.46%

5Y*

13.22%

10Y*

11.52%

FNCMX

YTD

32.52%

1M

4.05%

6M

13.30%

1Y

32.71%

5Y*

17.40%

10Y*

15.67%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FAD vs. FNCMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAD has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than FNCMX's 0.29% expense ratio.


FAD
First Trust Multi Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund
Expense ratio chart for FAD: current value at 0.63% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.63%
Expense ratio chart for FNCMX: current value at 0.29% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.29%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FAD vs. FNCMX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Multi Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FAD) and Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund (FNCMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FAD, currently valued at 1.56, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.561.84
The chart of Sortino ratio for FAD, currently valued at 2.15, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.002.152.41
The chart of Omega ratio for FAD, currently valued at 1.27, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.271.33
The chart of Calmar ratio for FAD, currently valued at 1.59, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.001.592.51
The chart of Martin ratio for FAD, currently valued at 9.50, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.009.509.34
FAD
FNCMX

The current FAD Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is comparable to the FNCMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAD and FNCMX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.00JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
1.56
1.84
FAD
FNCMX

Dividends

FAD vs. FNCMX - Dividend Comparison

FAD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%, more than FNCMX's 0.50% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
FAD
First Trust Multi Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund
0.58%0.51%0.60%0.09%0.32%0.48%0.20%0.22%0.64%0.41%0.44%0.31%
FNCMX
Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund
0.50%0.67%0.88%0.47%0.67%0.97%0.94%0.70%0.91%0.89%0.80%0.72%

Drawdowns

FAD vs. FNCMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAD drawdown since its inception was -54.33%, roughly equal to the maximum FNCMX drawdown of -55.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAD and FNCMX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-14.00%-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-6.45%
-2.03%
FAD
FNCMX

Volatility

FAD vs. FNCMX - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Multi Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FAD) has a higher volatility of 5.69% compared to Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund (FNCMX) at 5.12%. This indicates that FAD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNCMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
5.69%
5.12%
FAD
FNCMX
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab