FAD vs. FNCMX

In the year-to-date period, FAD achieves a 1.36% return, which is significantly higher than FNCMX's -0.28% return. Over the past 10 years, FAD has underperformed FNCMX with an annualized return of 11.04%, while FNCMX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.15% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

FAD has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than FNCMX's 0.29% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Multi Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FAD) and Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund (FNCMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current FAD Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is comparable to the FNCMX Sharpe Ratio of 0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAD and FNCMX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

FAD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, less than FNCMX's 0.61% yield.

The maximum FAD drawdown since its inception was -54.33%, roughly equal to the maximum FNCMX drawdown of -55.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAD and FNCMX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for First Trust Multi Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FAD) is 4.51%, while Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund (FNCMX) has a volatility of 6.85%. This indicates that FAD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNCMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.