FAD vs. FNCMX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FAD (First Trust Multi Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund) and FNCMX (Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund) are both funds - FAD is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ AlphaDEX Multi Cap Growth Index, while FNCMX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Composite Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FAD returned 14.53%/yr vs 19.45%/yr for FNCMX. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FAD charges 0.63%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for FNCMX.

Performance

FAD vs. FNCMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Multi Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FAD) and Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund (FNCMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FAD having a 17.25% return and FNCMX slightly lower at 16.82%. Over the past 10 years, FAD has underperformed FNCMX with an annualized return of 14.53%, while FNCMX has yielded a comparatively higher 19.45% annualized return.

FAD

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: 6.70%
• YTD: 17.25%
• 6M: 17.16%
• 1Y: 34.52%
• 3Y*: 24.16%
• 5Y*: 11.25%
• 10Y*: 14.53%

FNCMX

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: 8.17%
• YTD: 16.82%
• 6M: 15.82%
• 1Y: 40.51%
• 3Y*: 27.91%
• 5Y*: 15.70%
• 10Y*: 19.45%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FAD vs. FNCMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FAD First Trust Multi Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund	17.25%	17.23%	23.85%	19.07%	-24.06%	21.17%	34.92%	26.66%	-6.45%	25.75%
FNCMX Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund	16.82%	21.11%	29.48%	45.13%	-32.40%	22.21%	44.57%	36.63%	-3.07%	28.35%

Correlation

The correlation between FAD and FNCMX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.78
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.83
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2007	0.81

The correlation between FAD and FNCMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FAD vs. FNCMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAD

FAD Risk / Return Rank: 59
FAD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
FAD Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
FAD Omega Ratio Rank: 51
FAD Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
FAD Martin Ratio Rank: 68

FNCMX

FNCMX Risk / Return Rank: 68
FNCMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
FNCMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
FNCMX Omega Ratio Rank: 63
FNCMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
FNCMX Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAD vs. FNCMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Multi Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FAD) and Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund (FNCMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FAD	FNCMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.88	2.58	-0.70
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.59	3.36	-0.76
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.44	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.25	3.22	+0.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.54	12.65	-0.11
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FAD vs. FNCMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAD Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is comparable to the FNCMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAD and FNCMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FAD	FNCMX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.88	2.58	-0.70
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.55	0.70	-0.15
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.69	0.89	-0.20
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.50	0.58	-0.08

Drawdowns

FAD vs. FNCMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAD drawdown since its inception was -54.33%, roughly equal to the maximum FNCMX drawdown of -55.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAD and FNCMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FAD	FNCMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.33%	-55.08%	+0.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.66%	-13.01%	+2.35%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.55%	-24.20%	+0.65%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.99%	-35.64%	+3.65%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.25%	-35.64%	-1.61%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.15%	0.00%	-0.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.64%	-7.86%	-1.78%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.76%	3.30%	-0.54%

Volatility

FAD vs. FNCMX - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Multi Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FAD) has a higher volatility of 6.01% compared to Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund (FNCMX) at 4.12%. This indicates that FAD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNCMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FAD	FNCMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.01%	4.12%	+1.89%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.14%	12.10%	+2.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.50%	16.23%	+2.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.53%	22.46%	-1.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.18%	22.05%	-0.87%

FAD vs. FNCMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAD has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than FNCMX's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

FAD vs. FNCMX - Dividend Comparison

FAD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, less than FNCMX's 0.44% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FAD First Trust Multi Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund	0.09%	0.09%	0.59%	0.51%	0.60%	0.09%	0.32%	0.48%	0.20%	0.22%	0.64%	0.41%
FNCMX Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund	0.44%	0.51%	0.61%	0.67%	0.88%	0.47%	0.67%	4.41%	1.93%	0.03%	1.01%	1.50%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FAD and FNCMX in my portfolio?

FAD and FNCMX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FAD or FNCMX?

FAD has higher volatility (6.01%) compared to FNCMX (4.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAD dropped -54.33% vs FNCMX's -55.08%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FNCMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.