PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
F vs. GD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

F vs. GD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ford Motor Company (F) and General Dynamics Corporation (GD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, F achieves a 22.56% return, which is significantly higher than GD's 0.99% return. Over the past 10 years, F has underperformed GD with an annualized return of 6.87%, while GD has yielded a comparatively higher 11.57% annualized return.


F

1D
-2.72%
1M
38.33%
YTD
22.56%
6M
22.84%
1Y
61.77%
3Y*
15.26%
5Y*
4.77%
10Y*
6.87%

GD

1D
-0.17%
1M
-3.45%
YTD
0.99%
6M
0.56%
1Y
24.34%
3Y*
19.67%
5Y*
14.14%
10Y*
11.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

F vs. GD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
F
Ford Motor Company
22.56%42.35%-13.10%10.18%-42.18%137.48%-3.88%29.64%-34.35%8.73%
GD
General Dynamics Corporation
0.99%30.39%3.52%7.13%21.69%43.77%-13.14%14.80%-21.34%19.85%

Correlation

The correlation between F and GD is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 1977

0.30

The correlation between F and GD shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (1 year) to 0.38 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

F:

$63.96B

GD:

$92.38B

EPS

F:

-$1.52

GD:

$15.92

PS Ratio

F:

0.33

GD:

1.71

PB Ratio

F:

1.71

GD:

3.54

Total Revenue (TTM)

F:

$189.86B

GD:

$53.81B

Gross Profit (TTM)

F:

$17.42B

GD:

$7.48B

EBITDA (TTM)

F:

$9.99B

GD:

$6.26B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

F vs. GD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

F
F Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
F Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
F Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
F Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
F Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
F Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

GD
GD Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
GD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
GD Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
GD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
GD Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

F vs. GD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ford Motor Company (F) and General Dynamics Corporation (GD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FGDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.23

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.78

1.68

+1.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.48

5.90

+1.57

F vs. GD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current F Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is higher than the GD Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of F and GD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FGDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.68

1.17

+0.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

0.70

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

0.51

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

0.57

-0.41

Drawdowns

F vs. GD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum F drawdown since its inception was -97.07%, which is greater than GD's maximum drawdown of -75.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for F and GD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FGDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.07%

-75.67%

-21.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.31%

-14.53%

-7.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.51%

-22.55%

-13.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-58.62%

-22.55%

-36.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.77%

-51.63%

-13.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.68%

-7.83%

-22.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.70%

-15.61%

-29.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.29%

4.13%

+4.16%

Volatility

F vs. GD - Volatility Comparison

Ford Motor Company (F) has a higher volatility of 21.29% compared to General Dynamics Corporation (GD) at 5.09%. This indicates that F's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FGDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.29%

5.09%

+16.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.05%

17.03%

+12.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.02%

20.85%

+16.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.38%

20.38%

+19.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.46%

22.69%

+14.77%

Dividends

F vs. GD - Dividend Comparison

F's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.82%, more than GD's 1.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
F
Ford Motor Company
3.82%5.72%7.88%4.92%4.30%0.48%1.71%6.45%9.54%5.20%7.01%4.26%
GD
General Dynamics Corporation
1.81%1.76%2.12%2.01%2.00%2.24%2.90%2.26%2.31%1.61%1.72%1.96%

Financials

F vs. GD - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ford Motor Company and General Dynamics Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


10.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B50.00B20222023202420252026
43.25B
13.48B
(F) Total Revenue
(GD) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

F vs. GD - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Ford Motor Company and General Dynamics Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

5.0%10.0%15.0%20.0%20222023202420252026
18.4%
10.5%
Portfolio components
F - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ford Motor Company reported a gross profit of 7.94B and revenue of 43.25B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 18.4%.

GD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, General Dynamics Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.42B and revenue of 13.48B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.5%.

F - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ford Motor Company reported an operating income of 2.33B and revenue of 43.25B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.4%.

GD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, General Dynamics Corporation reported an operating income of 1.42B and revenue of 13.48B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.5%.

F - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ford Motor Company reported a net income of 2.55B and revenue of 43.25B, resulting in a net margin of 5.9%.

GD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, General Dynamics Corporation reported a net income of 1.13B and revenue of 13.48B, resulting in a net margin of 8.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


F and GD have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

F has higher volatility (21.29%) compared to GD (5.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, F dropped -97.07% vs GD's -75.67%.

F currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for F and GD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer