PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EZJ vs. SPXL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EZJ vs. SPXL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan (EZJ) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF (SPXL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with EZJ having a 29.29% return and SPXL slightly higher at 29.52%. Over the past 10 years, EZJ has underperformed SPXL with an annualized return of 10.56%, while SPXL has yielded a comparatively higher 30.15% annualized return.


EZJ

1D
0.39%
1M
10.56%
YTD
29.29%
6M
28.96%
1Y
58.99%
3Y*
26.09%
5Y*
7.76%
10Y*
10.56%

SPXL

1D
1.07%
1M
13.37%
YTD
29.52%
6M
27.91%
1Y
83.85%
3Y*
53.71%
5Y*
23.77%
10Y*
30.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EZJ vs. SPXL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EZJ
ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan
29.29%42.72%3.31%30.78%-38.23%-1.96%22.21%33.76%-30.99%49.10%
SPXL
Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF
29.52%31.94%63.61%69.49%-56.55%98.75%9.64%102.80%-25.11%71.03%

Correlation

The correlation between EZJ and SPXL is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 8, 2009

0.62

The correlation between EZJ and SPXL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

EZJ vs. SPXL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EZJ
SPXL

Industrials

26.0%
1.7%

Technology

19.1%
8.5%

Financial Services

17.6%
2.6%

Consumer Cyclical

12.2%
2.2%

Communication Services

7.9%
2.4%

Healthcare

6.2%
1.9%

Consumer Defensive

3.6%
1.1%

Basic Materials

3.0%
0.4%

Real Estate

2.3%
0.4%

Utilities

1.1%
0.6%

Energy

1.1%
0.8%

Industrials

EZJ
26.0%
SPXL
1.7%

Technology

EZJ
19.1%
SPXL
8.5%

Financial Services

EZJ
17.6%
SPXL
2.6%

Consumer Cyclical

EZJ
12.2%
SPXL
2.2%

Communication Services

EZJ
7.9%
SPXL
2.4%

Healthcare

EZJ
6.2%
SPXL
1.9%

Consumer Defensive

EZJ
3.6%
SPXL
1.1%

Basic Materials

EZJ
3.0%
SPXL
0.4%

Real Estate

EZJ
2.3%
SPXL
0.4%

Utilities

EZJ
1.1%
SPXL
0.6%

Energy

EZJ
1.1%
SPXL
0.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EZJ vs. SPXL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EZJ
EZJ Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
EZJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EZJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
EZJ Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
EZJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
EZJ Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

SPXL
SPXL Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
SPXL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPXL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPXL Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
SPXL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPXL Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EZJ vs. SPXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan (EZJ) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF (SPXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EZJSPXLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.37

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.21

3.15

-0.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.79

13.30

-6.52

EZJ vs. SPXL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EZJ Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is lower than the SPXL Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EZJ and SPXL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EZJSPXLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.49

2.38

-0.89

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

0.48

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

0.57

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.53

-0.29

Drawdowns

EZJ vs. SPXL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EZJ drawdown since its inception was -58.63%, smaller than the maximum SPXL drawdown of -76.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZJ and SPXL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EZJSPXLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.63%

-76.86%

+18.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.78%

-26.77%

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.48%

-48.95%

+17.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-58.63%

-63.80%

+5.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.63%

-76.86%

+18.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.87%

-1.03%

-2.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.28%

-15.72%

-5.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.72%

6.32%

+2.40%

Volatility

EZJ vs. SPXL - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan (EZJ) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF (SPXL) have volatilities of 8.46% and 8.33%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EZJSPXLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.46%

8.33%

+0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.74%

26.68%

+4.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.67%

35.37%

+4.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.58%

50.23%

-13.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.53%

53.41%

-18.88%

EZJ vs. SPXL - Expense Ratio Comparison

EZJ has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SPXL's 0.84% expense ratio.


Dividends

EZJ vs. SPXL - Dividend Comparison

EZJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, more than SPXL's 0.52% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
EZJ
ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan
1.60%1.13%2.09%1.11%0.56%0.00%0.00%0.24%4.49%0.00%
SPXL
Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF
0.52%0.69%0.74%0.98%0.32%0.11%0.22%0.84%1.02%3.88%

Frequently Asked Questions


EZJ and SPXL have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EZJ has higher volatility (8.46%) compared to SPXL (8.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EZJ dropped -58.63% vs SPXL's -76.86%.

On 10-year performance, SPXL leads with 30.15% vs 10.56% for EZJ. On fees, SPXL is cheaper at 0.84% per year. On volatility, SPXL has been the lower-risk option at 8.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPXL has performed better with a 30.15% return vs 10.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPXL is cheaper with a 0.84% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for EZJ.

EZJ has the higher dividend yield at 1.60%, compared with 0.52% for SPXL.

EZJ tracks MSCI Japan Index (200%), while SPXL tracks S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for EZJ and 0.84% for SPXL.

SPXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EZJ and SPXL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer