PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EZBC vs. BITX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EZBC vs. BITX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Bitcoin ETF (EZBC) and 2x Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EZBC achieves a -28.83% return, which is significantly higher than BITX's -57.54% return.


EZBC

1D
-3.22%
1M
-17.79%
YTD
-28.83%
6M
-28.96%
1Y
-39.76%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BITX

1D
-6.62%
1M
-34.22%
YTD
-57.54%
6M
-57.83%
1Y
-74.26%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EZBC vs. BITX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
EZBC
Franklin Bitcoin ETF
-28.83%-6.56%87.83%
BITX
2x Bitcoin Strategy ETF
-57.54%-38.71%124.62%

Correlation

The correlation between EZBC and BITX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024

1.00

The correlation between EZBC and BITX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EZBC vs. BITX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EZBC
EZBC Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
EZBC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EZBC Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
EZBC Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
EZBC Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
EZBC Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

BITX
BITX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BITX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BITX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITX Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EZBC vs. BITX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Bitcoin ETF (EZBC) and 2x Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EZBCBITXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.86

0.84

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.77

-0.91

+0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.30

-1.40

+0.09

EZBC vs. BITX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EZBC Sharpe Ratio is -0.90, which is comparable to the BITX Sharpe Ratio of -0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EZBC and BITX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EZBC vs. BITX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EZBC drawdown since its inception was -52.07%, smaller than the maximum BITX drawdown of -82.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZBC and BITX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EZBCBITXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.07%

-82.16%

+30.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-52.07%

-82.16%

+30.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-50.46%

-81.23%

+30.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.89%

-32.50%

+15.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

30.56%

53.22%

-22.66%

Volatility

EZBC vs. BITX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Bitcoin ETF (EZBC) is 13.04%, while 2x Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITX) has a volatility of 26.10%. This indicates that EZBC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EZBCBITXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.04%

26.10%

-13.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.61%

69.46%

-34.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.23%

87.90%

-43.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

50.15%

98.18%

-48.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

50.15%

98.18%

-48.03%

EZBC vs. BITX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EZBC has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than BITX's 2.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

EZBC vs. BITX - Dividend Comparison

EZBC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BITX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 37.54%.


PositionTTM20252024
BITX
2x Bitcoin Strategy ETF
37.54%21.69%10.70%
EZBC
Franklin Bitcoin ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, EZBC and BITX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BITX has higher volatility (26.10%) compared to EZBC (13.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EZBC dropped -52.07% vs BITX's -82.16%.

On 1-year performance, EZBC leads with -39.76% vs -74.26% for BITX. On fees, EZBC is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, EZBC has been the lower-risk option at 13.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, EZBC has performed better with a -39.76% return vs -74.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EZBC is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 2.38% for BITX.

BITX has the higher dividend yield at 37.54%, compared with 0.00% for EZBC.

EZBC tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant, while BITX tracks S&P CME Bitcoin Futures Daily Roll Index (200%). They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Volatility Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for EZBC and 2.38% for BITX.

BITX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.85 vs -0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EZBC and BITX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer