EZA vs. VPL
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI South Africa ETF (EZA) and Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF (VPL).
EZA and VPL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EZA is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI South Africa Index. It was launched on Feb 7, 2003. VPL is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the FTSE Developed Asia Pacific Index. It was launched on Mar 4, 2005. Both EZA and VPL are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EZA or VPL.
Key characteristics
| EZA | VPL | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -4.19% | 1.05% |
| 1Y Return | -3.85% | 9.76% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -4.70% | -1.39% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | -1.62% | 4.62% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | -1.04% | 4.87% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.09 | 0.83 |
| Daily Std Dev | 26.42% | 13.57% |
| Max Drawdown | -64.64% | -55.49% |
| Current Drawdown | -28.64% | -7.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between EZA and VPL is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
EZA vs. VPL - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, EZA achieves a -4.19% return, which is significantly lower than VPL's 1.05% return. Over the past 10 years, EZA has underperformed VPL with an annualized return of -1.04%, while VPL has yielded a comparatively higher 4.87% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EZA vs. VPL - Expense Ratio Comparison
EZA has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than VPL's 0.08% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EZA vs. VPL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI South Africa ETF (EZA) and Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF (VPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
EZA vs. VPL - Dividend Comparison
EZA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.96%, less than VPL's 3.29% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EZA iShares MSCI South Africa ETF | 2.96% | 2.84% | 3.90% | 2.05% | 5.51% | 12.27% | 3.81% | 1.55% | 4.10% | 3.03% | 2.20% | 2.44% |
VPL Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF | 3.29% | 3.12% | 2.75% | 3.19% | 1.81% | 2.84% | 3.06% | 2.57% | 2.65% | 2.43% | 2.69% | 2.49% |
Drawdowns
EZA vs. VPL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EZA drawdown since its inception was -64.64%, which is greater than VPL's maximum drawdown of -55.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZA and VPL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
EZA vs. VPL - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI South Africa ETF (EZA) has a higher volatility of 6.26% compared to Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF (VPL) at 3.95%. This indicates that EZA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.