PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EXV1.DE vs. FNCL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EXV1.DE vs. FNCL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares STOXX Europe 600 Banks UCITS ETF (DE) (EXV1.DE) and Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF (FNCL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EXV1.DE is traded in EUR, while FNCL is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FNCL values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EXV1.DE achieves a 7.43% return, which is significantly higher than FNCL's -1.86% return. Over the past 10 years, EXV1.DE has outperformed FNCL with an annualized return of 14.23%, while FNCL has yielded a comparatively lower 12.27% annualized return.


EXV1.DE

1D
0.48%
1M
2.19%
YTD
7.43%
6M
15.31%
1Y
39.88%
3Y*
42.40%
5Y*
27.92%
10Y*
14.23%

FNCL

1D
0.99%
1M
2.47%
YTD
-1.86%
6M
-0.42%
1Y
5.42%
3Y*
16.30%
5Y*
9.59%
10Y*
12.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EXV1.DE vs. FNCL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EXV1.DE
iShares STOXX Europe 600 Banks UCITS ETF (DE)
7.43%77.02%32.97%26.28%1.84%37.98%-24.54%15.17%-25.82%11.63%
FNCL
Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF
-1.86%1.30%39.05%10.68%-6.85%45.01%-10.25%34.56%-9.38%5.24%

Correlation

The correlation between EXV1.DE and FNCL is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2013

0.48

The correlation between EXV1.DE and FNCL shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (3 years) to 0.48 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EXV1.DE vs. FNCL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EXV1.DE
EXV1.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
EXV1.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EXV1.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
EXV1.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
EXV1.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
EXV1.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

FNCL
FNCL Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
FNCL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNCL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNCL Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
FNCL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNCL Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EXV1.DE vs. FNCL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares STOXX Europe 600 Banks UCITS ETF (DE) (EXV1.DE) and Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF (FNCL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EXV1.DEFNCLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.07

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.55

0.40

+2.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.70

0.99

+7.71

EXV1.DE vs. FNCL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EXV1.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is higher than the FNCL Sharpe Ratio of 0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EXV1.DE and FNCL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EXV1.DEFNCLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.85

0.35

+1.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.21

0.50

+0.71

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.54

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.10

0.59

-0.48

Drawdowns

EXV1.DE vs. FNCL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EXV1.DE drawdown since its inception was -82.30%, which is greater than FNCL's maximum drawdown of -44.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EXV1.DE and FNCL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EXV1.DEFNCLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.30%

-44.00%

-38.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.03%

-13.45%

-2.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.12%

-22.45%

+2.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.12%

-22.45%

-5.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.14%

-44.00%

-12.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.37%

-7.62%

+6.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.64%

-7.08%

-37.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.71%

5.49%

-0.78%

Volatility

EXV1.DE vs. FNCL - Volatility Comparison

iShares STOXX Europe 600 Banks UCITS ETF (DE) (EXV1.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.77% compared to Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF (FNCL) at 4.11%. This indicates that EXV1.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNCL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EXV1.DEFNCLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.77%

4.11%

+1.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.93%

11.46%

+6.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.06%

15.53%

+6.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.83%

19.17%

+3.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.03%

22.80%

+2.23%

EXV1.DE vs. FNCL - Expense Ratio Comparison

EXV1.DE has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than FNCL's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

EXV1.DE vs. FNCL - Dividend Comparison

EXV1.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.59%, more than FNCL's 1.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EXV1.DE
iShares STOXX Europe 600 Banks UCITS ETF (DE)
3.59%3.63%5.51%4.53%6.37%1.06%1.52%4.31%4.03%6.01%3.49%3.41%
FNCL
Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF
1.65%1.45%1.52%1.91%2.29%1.75%2.26%2.17%2.37%1.60%1.81%2.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


EXV1.DE and FNCL have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FNCL is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FNCL is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for EXV1.DE.

EXV1.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600 Banks, while FNCL tracks MSCI USA IMI Financials Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for EXV1.DE and 0.08% for FNCL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EXV1.DE and FNCL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer