PortfoliosLab logo
EXR vs. CUBE
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between EXR and CUBE is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

EXR vs. CUBE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Extra Space Storage Inc. (EXR) and CubeSmart (CUBE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

EXR:

0.18

CUBE:

0.11

Sortino Ratio

EXR:

0.42

CUBE:

0.50

Omega Ratio

EXR:

1.05

CUBE:

1.06

Calmar Ratio

EXR:

0.12

CUBE:

0.18

Martin Ratio

EXR:

0.37

CUBE:

0.39

Ulcer Index

EXR:

12.42%

CUBE:

15.09%

Daily Std Dev

EXR:

25.49%

CUBE:

24.88%

Max Drawdown

EXR:

-71.35%

CUBE:

-93.15%

Current Drawdown

EXR:

-23.31%

CUBE:

-17.35%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

EXR:

$33.62B

CUBE:

$10.01B

EPS

EXR:

$4.29

CUBE:

$1.69

PE Ratio

EXR:

35.38

CUBE:

25.85

PEG Ratio

EXR:

3.86

CUBE:

6.31

PS Ratio

EXR:

10.00

CUBE:

9.27

PB Ratio

EXR:

2.32

CUBE:

3.50

Total Revenue (TTM)

EXR:

$3.28B

CUBE:

$1.08B

Gross Profit (TTM)

EXR:

$2.16B

CUBE:

$703.18M

EBITDA (TTM)

EXR:

$2.38B

CUBE:

$695.30M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EXR achieves a 3.16% return, which is significantly lower than CUBE's 4.22% return. Over the past 10 years, EXR has outperformed CUBE with an annualized return of 11.97%, while CUBE has yielded a comparatively lower 10.28% annualized return.


EXR

YTD

3.16%

1M

8.08%

6M

-5.45%

1Y

4.66%

3Y*

0.23%

5Y*

15.90%

10Y*

11.97%

CUBE

YTD

4.22%

1M

10.13%

6M

-8.15%

1Y

2.80%

3Y*

6.89%

5Y*

16.39%

10Y*

10.28%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Extra Space Storage Inc.

CubeSmart

Risk-Adjusted Performance

EXR vs. CUBE — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EXR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of EXR is 5454
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of EXR is 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of EXR is 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of EXR is 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of EXR is 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of EXR is 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

CUBE
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CUBE is 5555
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CUBE is 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CUBE is 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CUBE is 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CUBE is 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CUBE is 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

EXR vs. CUBE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Extra Space Storage Inc. (EXR) and CubeSmart (CUBE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current EXR Sharpe Ratio is 0.18, which is higher than the CUBE Sharpe Ratio of 0.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EXR and CUBE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

EXR vs. CUBE - Dividend Comparison

EXR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.25%, less than CUBE's 4.73% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
EXR
Extra Space Storage Inc.
4.25%4.33%4.04%4.08%1.98%3.11%3.37%3.71%3.57%3.79%2.54%3.09%
CUBE
CubeSmart
4.73%3.57%4.27%4.42%2.55%3.96%4.10%4.25%3.84%3.36%2.25%2.49%

Drawdowns

EXR vs. CUBE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EXR drawdown since its inception was -71.35%, smaller than the maximum CUBE drawdown of -93.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EXR and CUBE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

EXR vs. CUBE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Extra Space Storage Inc. (EXR) is 6.27%, while CubeSmart (CUBE) has a volatility of 7.72%. This indicates that EXR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CUBE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

EXR vs. CUBE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Extra Space Storage Inc. and CubeSmart. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M600.00M700.00M800.00M20212022202320242025
820.00M
273.04M
(EXR) Total Revenue
(CUBE) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

EXR vs. CUBE - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Extra Space Storage Inc. and CubeSmart over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
70.7%
69.6%
(EXR) Gross Margin
(CUBE) Gross Margin
EXR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Extra Space Storage Inc. reported a gross profit of 579.30M and revenue of 820.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 70.7%.

CUBE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, CubeSmart reported a gross profit of 190.10M and revenue of 273.04M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 69.6%.

EXR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Extra Space Storage Inc. reported an operating income of 388.73M and revenue of 820.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 47.4%.

CUBE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, CubeSmart reported an operating income of 114.88M and revenue of 273.04M, resulting in an operating margin of 42.1%.

EXR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Extra Space Storage Inc. reported a net income of 270.88M and revenue of 820.00M, resulting in a net margin of 33.0%.

CUBE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, CubeSmart reported a net income of 89.20M and revenue of 273.04M, resulting in a net margin of 32.7%.