PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
EXR vs. CUBE
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


EXRCUBE
YTD Return5.48%8.37%
1Y Return32.00%31.58%
3Y Return (Ann)-2.41%0.35%
5Y Return (Ann)12.91%13.88%
10Y Return (Ann)15.05%13.12%
Sharpe Ratio1.621.68
Sortino Ratio2.362.35
Omega Ratio1.291.30
Calmar Ratio1.131.50
Martin Ratio5.225.91
Ulcer Index8.71%6.85%
Daily Std Dev28.10%24.03%
Max Drawdown-71.35%-93.15%
Current Drawdown-19.32%-9.98%

Fundamentals


EXRCUBE
Market Cap$35.85B$11.04B
EPS$3.76$1.75
PE Ratio43.2327.31
PEG Ratio5.166.31
Total Revenue (TTM)$3.23B$1.06B
Gross Profit (TTM)$3.22B$596.82M
EBITDA (TTM)$1.95B$692.99M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.7

The correlation between EXR and CUBE is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

EXR vs. CUBE - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, EXR achieves a 5.48% return, which is significantly lower than CUBE's 8.37% return. Over the past 10 years, EXR has outperformed CUBE with an annualized return of 15.05%, while CUBE has yielded a comparatively lower 13.12% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
9.98%
15.34%
EXR
CUBE

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

EXR vs. CUBE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Extra Space Storage Inc. (EXR) and CubeSmart (CUBE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EXR
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for EXR, currently valued at 1.62, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.62
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for EXR, currently valued at 2.36, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.36
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for EXR, currently valued at 1.29, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.29
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for EXR, currently valued at 1.13, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.13
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for EXR, currently valued at 5.22, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.005.22
CUBE
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CUBE, currently valued at 1.68, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.68
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CUBE, currently valued at 2.35, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.35
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CUBE, currently valued at 1.30, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.30
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CUBE, currently valued at 1.50, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.50
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CUBE, currently valued at 5.91, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.005.91

EXR vs. CUBE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EXR Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is comparable to the CUBE Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EXR and CUBE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.62
1.68
EXR
CUBE

Dividends

EXR vs. CUBE - Dividend Comparison

EXR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.95%, less than CUBE's 4.19% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
EXR
Extra Space Storage Inc.
3.95%4.04%4.08%1.98%3.11%3.37%3.71%3.57%3.79%2.54%3.09%3.44%
CUBE
CubeSmart
4.19%4.27%4.42%2.55%3.96%4.10%4.25%3.84%3.36%2.25%2.49%2.89%

Drawdowns

EXR vs. CUBE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EXR drawdown since its inception was -71.35%, smaller than the maximum CUBE drawdown of -93.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EXR and CUBE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-19.32%
-9.98%
EXR
CUBE

Volatility

EXR vs. CUBE - Volatility Comparison

Extra Space Storage Inc. (EXR) and CubeSmart (CUBE) have volatilities of 8.70% and 8.51%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
8.70%
8.51%
EXR
CUBE

Financials

EXR vs. CUBE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Extra Space Storage Inc. and CubeSmart. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items