PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EWZ vs. FRT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EWZ vs. FRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Brazil ETF (EWZ) and Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWZ achieves a 12.45% return, which is significantly lower than FRT's 24.70% return. Over the past 10 years, EWZ has outperformed FRT with an annualized return of 6.34%, while FRT has yielded a comparatively lower 0.76% annualized return.


EWZ

1D
-1.50%
1M
1.79%
6M
8.49%
YTD
12.45%
1Y
34.32%
3Y*
9.34%
5Y*
5.35%
10Y*
6.34%

FRT

1D
0.74%
1M
-2.28%
6M
22.09%
YTD
24.70%
1Y
33.97%
3Y*
11.36%
5Y*
4.90%
10Y*
0.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWZ vs. FRT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EWZ
iShares MSCI Brazil ETF
12.45%48.81%-30.41%32.62%12.09%-17.32%-20.35%27.67%-2.52%23.62%
FRT
Federal Realty Investment Trust
24.70%-5.91%12.07%6.55%-22.66%65.97%-30.66%12.51%-8.10%-3.59%

Correlation

The correlation between EWZ and FRT is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2000

0.32

The correlation between EWZ and FRT shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (1 year) to 0.32 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EWZ vs. FRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWZ
EWZ Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
EWZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWZ Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
EWZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWZ Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

FRT
FRT Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
FRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRT Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
FRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRT Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWZ vs. FRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Brazil ETF (EWZ) and Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EWZFRTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.33

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.79

4.90

-3.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.74

12.28

-7.54

EWZ vs. FRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is lower than the FRT Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWZ and FRT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EWZ vs. FRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWZ drawdown since its inception was -77.25%, which is greater than FRT's maximum drawdown of -57.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWZ and FRT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EWZFRTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.25%

-57.42%

-19.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.27%

-6.96%

-12.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.36%

-27.38%

-3.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.24%

-34.99%

+2.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.99%

-56.47%

-0.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.68%

-2.28%

-19.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.90%

-11.76%

-24.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.25%

2.77%

+4.48%

Volatility

EWZ vs. FRT - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Brazil ETF (EWZ) has a higher volatility of 5.99% compared to Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) at 5.12%. This indicates that EWZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EWZFRTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.99%

5.12%

+0.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.76%

12.28%

+7.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.01%

17.33%

+7.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.61%

23.24%

+4.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.91%

29.47%

+4.44%

Dividends

EWZ vs. FRT - Dividend Comparison

EWZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.14%, more than FRT's 3.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EWZ
iShares MSCI Brazil ETF
4.14%5.19%8.91%5.66%12.59%9.87%1.71%2.54%2.89%1.71%1.81%4.08%
FRT
Federal Realty Investment Trust
3.71%4.39%2.93%4.21%4.26%3.12%4.96%3.22%3.42%2.98%2.70%2.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


EWZ and FRT have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EWZ has higher volatility (5.99%) compared to FRT (5.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWZ dropped -77.25% vs FRT's -57.42%.

FRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EWZ and FRT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer