PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EWT vs. HEZU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EWT vs. HEZU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT) and iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Eurozone ETF (HEZU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWT achieves a 64.84% return, which is significantly higher than HEZU's 12.22% return. Over the past 10 years, EWT has outperformed HEZU with an annualized return of 20.37%, while HEZU has yielded a comparatively lower 13.11% annualized return.


EWT

1D
-0.49%
1M
8.14%
YTD
64.84%
6M
67.47%
1Y
92.77%
3Y*
39.25%
5Y*
18.90%
10Y*
20.37%

HEZU

1D
-0.31%
1M
3.34%
YTD
12.22%
6M
12.23%
1Y
23.71%
3Y*
19.06%
5Y*
12.74%
10Y*
13.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWT vs. HEZU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EWT
iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF
64.84%28.38%16.11%29.00%-28.90%26.18%31.50%33.36%-9.90%26.81%
HEZU
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Eurozone ETF
12.22%25.93%10.63%22.98%-9.54%23.51%0.52%29.48%-10.23%14.26%

Correlation

The correlation between EWT and HEZU is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 7, 2014

0.59

The correlation between EWT and HEZU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

EWT vs. HEZU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EWT
HEZU

Technology

76.9%
16.1%

Financial Services

12.0%
23.8%

Industrials

3.1%
21.0%

Basic Materials

2.9%
4.1%

Communication Services

1.7%
4.3%

Consumer Cyclical

1.6%
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

1.0%
5.5%

Healthcare

1.0%
5.6%

Energy

-

3.9%

Real Estate

-

0.9%

Utilities

-

6.4%

Technology

EWT
76.9%
HEZU
16.1%

Financial Services

EWT
12.0%
HEZU
23.8%

Industrials

EWT
3.1%
HEZU
21.0%

Basic Materials

EWT
2.9%
HEZU
4.1%

Communication Services

EWT
1.7%
HEZU
4.3%

Consumer Cyclical

EWT
1.6%
HEZU
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

EWT
1.0%
HEZU
5.5%

Healthcare

EWT
1.0%
HEZU
5.6%

Energy

EWT

-

HEZU
3.9%

Real Estate

EWT

-

HEZU
0.9%

Utilities

EWT

-

HEZU
6.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EWT vs. HEZU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWT
EWT Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
EWT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWT Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
EWT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWT Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

HEZU
HEZU Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
HEZU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HEZU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
HEZU Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
HEZU Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
HEZU Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWT vs. HEZU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT) and iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Eurozone ETF (HEZU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EWTHEZUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.28

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.87

2.17

+6.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

25.89

8.54

+17.36

EWT vs. HEZU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWT Sharpe Ratio is 3.36, which is higher than the HEZU Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWT and HEZU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EWT vs. HEZU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWT drawdown since its inception was -64.37%, which is greater than HEZU's maximum drawdown of -38.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWT and HEZU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EWTHEZUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.37%

-38.80%

-25.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.51%

-10.95%

+0.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.66%

-14.83%

-10.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.88%

-22.79%

-16.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.88%

-38.80%

-0.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.11%

-2.16%

-3.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.13%

-5.81%

-13.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.60%

2.79%

+0.81%

Volatility

EWT vs. HEZU - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT) has a higher volatility of 14.76% compared to iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Eurozone ETF (HEZU) at 5.47%. This indicates that EWT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HEZU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EWTHEZUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.76%

5.47%

+9.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.90%

13.22%

+10.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.86%

15.56%

+12.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.16%

16.60%

+6.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.80%

18.18%

+3.62%

EWT vs. HEZU - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWT has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than HEZU's 0.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

EWT vs. HEZU - Dividend Comparison

EWT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, more than HEZU's 2.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EWT
iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF
2.69%4.43%3.32%12.01%18.82%0.55%1.83%2.49%3.16%2.81%2.39%3.12%
HEZU
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Eurozone ETF
2.61%2.92%2.77%2.52%23.26%2.25%2.32%5.40%3.48%1.92%3.11%2.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


EWT and HEZU have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EWT has higher volatility (14.76%) compared to HEZU (5.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWT dropped -64.37% vs HEZU's -38.80%.

On 10-year performance, EWT leads with 20.37% vs 13.11% for HEZU. On fees, HEZU is cheaper at 0.52% per year. On volatility, HEZU has been the lower-risk option at 5.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EWT has performed better with a 20.37% return vs 13.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HEZU is cheaper with a 0.52% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EWT.

EWT has the higher dividend yield at 2.69%, compared with 2.61% for HEZU.

EWT is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while HEZU is Europe Equities. EWT tracks MSCI Taiwan 25/50 Index, while HEZU tracks MSCI EMU 100% USD Hedged Index. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for EWT and 0.52% for HEZU.

EWT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.36 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EWT and HEZU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer