EWT vs. DBJP
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT) and Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP).
EWT and DBJP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EWT is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Taiwan Index. It was launched on Jun 20, 2000. DBJP is a passively managed fund by Deutsche Bank that tracks the performance of the MSCI Japan US Dollar Hedged Index. It was launched on Jun 9, 2011. Both EWT and DBJP are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EWT or DBJP.
Correlation
The correlation between EWT and DBJP is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
EWT vs. DBJP - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
EWT:
0.04
DBJP:
0.10
EWT:
0.24
DBJP:
0.31
EWT:
1.03
DBJP:
1.04
EWT:
0.04
DBJP:
0.12
EWT:
0.13
DBJP:
0.33
EWT:
8.44%
DBJP:
7.84%
EWT:
26.83%
DBJP:
25.45%
EWT:
-64.26%
DBJP:
-31.30%
EWT:
-18.52%
DBJP:
-8.93%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EWT achieves a -10.78% return, which is significantly lower than DBJP's -4.48% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with EWT having a 8.08% annualized return and DBJP not far ahead at 8.42%.
EWT
-10.78%
-8.48%
-16.66%
-0.40%
12.77%
8.08%
DBJP
-4.48%
-6.73%
1.25%
1.68%
18.06%
8.42%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EWT vs. DBJP - Expense Ratio Comparison
EWT has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than DBJP's 0.46% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EWT vs. DBJP — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
EWT
DBJP
EWT vs. DBJP - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT) and Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
EWT vs. DBJP - Dividend Comparison
EWT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.72%, more than DBJP's 2.93% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWT iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF | 3.72% | 3.32% | 12.01% | 18.82% | 2.64% | 1.83% | 2.49% | 3.16% | 2.81% | 2.39% | 3.12% | 1.93% |
DBJP Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF | 2.93% | 2.80% | 5.21% | 0.80% | 2.30% | 2.53% | 2.56% | 3.87% | 2.07% | 1.13% | 5.95% | 10.53% |
Drawdowns
EWT vs. DBJP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EWT drawdown since its inception was -64.26%, which is greater than DBJP's maximum drawdown of -31.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWT and DBJP. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
EWT vs. DBJP - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT) and Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP) have volatilities of 15.27% and 15.36%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.