PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
EWS vs. QQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

EWS vs. QQQ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EWS (iShares MSCI Singapore ETF) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EWS is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Singapore Index, while QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EWS returned 7.91%/yr vs 21.94%/yr for QQQ. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EWS charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQ.

Performance

EWS vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Singapore ETF (EWS) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWS achieves a 8.22% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 21.30% return. Over the past 10 years, EWS has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 7.91%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 21.94% annualized return.

EWS

1D
-0.70%
1M
4.60%
YTD
8.22%
6M
8.37%
1Y
19.41%
3Y*
21.86%
5Y*
9.39%
10Y*
7.91%

QQQ

1D
-0.26%
1M
10.60%
YTD
21.30%
6M
19.66%
1Y
41.82%
3Y*
28.78%
5Y*
17.97%
10Y*
21.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWS vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EWS
iShares MSCI Singapore ETF		8.22%31.35%22.10%6.15%-9.80%5.47%-8.47%14.54%-11.34%34.78%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF		21.30%20.77%25.58%54.86%-32.58%27.42%48.62%38.96%-0.13%32.66%

Correlation

The correlation between EWS and QQQ is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 1999

0.52

The correlation between EWS and QQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

EWS vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
EWS
QQQ

Financial Services

52.2%
0.2%

Industrials

18.1%
2.8%

Real Estate

8.6%
0.1%

Utilities

4.7%
1.4%

Consumer Defensive

4.6%
7.7%

Communication Services

4.2%
15.8%

Technology

4.0%
53.8%

Consumer Cyclical

3.5%
12.3%

Basic Materials

-

1.1%

Energy

-

0.6%

Healthcare

-

4.2%

Financial Services

EWS
52.2%
QQQ
0.2%

Industrials

EWS
18.1%
QQQ
2.8%

Real Estate

EWS
8.6%
QQQ
0.1%

Utilities

EWS
4.7%
QQQ
1.4%

Consumer Defensive

EWS
4.6%
QQQ
7.7%

Communication Services

EWS
4.2%
QQQ
15.8%

Technology

EWS
4.0%
QQQ
53.8%

Consumer Cyclical

EWS
3.5%
QQQ
12.3%

Basic Materials

EWS

-

QQQ
1.1%

Energy

EWS

-

QQQ
0.6%

Healthcare

EWS

-

QQQ
4.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares MSCI Singapore ETF

Invesco QQQ ETF

Often compared with EWS:
EWS vs. EWHEWS vs. EWTEWS vs. EWJEWS vs. ASEAEWS vs. SMINEWS vs. FLGREWS vs. VOO
Often compared with QQQ:
QQQ vs. SPYQQQ vs. VOOQQQ vs. VGTQQQ vs. TQQQQQQ vs. SMHQQQ vs. QQQMQQQ vs. QQQI

Return for Risk

EWS vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
EWS
EWS Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
EWS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWS Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
EWS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWS Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWS vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Singapore ETF (EWS) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

EWSQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.32
2.64

-1.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.96
3.45

-1.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.45

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.49

3.51

-1.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.08

13.49

-7.42

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EWS vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWS Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is lower than the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWS and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

EWSQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.32

2.64

-1.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.81

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.99

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

0.41

-0.26

Drawdowns

EWS vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWS drawdown since its inception was -75.00%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWS and QQQ.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

EWSQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.00%

-82.97%

+7.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.82%

-11.96%

+4.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.34%

-22.77%

+6.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.06%

-35.12%

+6.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.84%

-35.12%

-5.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.70%

-0.26%

-0.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.88%

-32.79%

+10.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.20%

3.11%

+0.09%

Volatility

EWS vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Singapore ETF (EWS) is 3.68%, while Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a volatility of 4.49%. This indicates that EWS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

EWSQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.68%

4.49%

-0.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.45%

12.10%

-0.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.73%

15.94%

-1.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.25%

22.38%

-5.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.03%

22.29%

-4.26%

EWS vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWS has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

EWS vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

EWS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.79%, more than QQQ's 0.38% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EWS
iShares MSCI Singapore ETF		3.79%4.10%4.28%6.50%2.56%6.00%2.68%4.70%4.21%3.46%3.96%4.20%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF		0.38%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions

EWS and QQQ have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQ has higher volatility (4.49%) compared to EWS (3.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWS dropped -75.00% vs QQQ's -82.97%.

On 10-year performance, QQQ leads with 21.94% vs 7.91% for EWS. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, EWS has been the lower-risk option at 3.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 21.94% return vs 7.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for EWS.

EWS has the higher dividend yield at 3.79%, compared with 0.38% for QQQ.

EWS is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. EWS tracks MSCI Singapore Index, while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for EWS and 0.18% for QQQ.

QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EWS and QQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer