EWMC vs. XLG

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

EWMC (Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF) and XLG (Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EWMC is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 GARP Index, while XLG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Top 50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EWMC returned 11.00%/yr vs 17.27%/yr for XLG. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EWMC charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XLG.

Performance

EWMC vs. XLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF (EWMC) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with EWMC having a 7.23% return and XLG slightly higher at 7.57%. Over the past 10 years, EWMC has underperformed XLG with an annualized return of 11.00%, while XLG has yielded a comparatively higher 17.27% annualized return.

EWMC

• 1D: 0.53%
• 1M: 2.17%
• YTD: 7.23%
• 6M: 8.16%
• 1Y: 24.41%
• 3Y*: 14.98%
• 5Y*: 7.70%
• 10Y*: 11.00%

XLG

• 1D: -1.15%
• 1M: 4.22%
• YTD: 7.57%
• 6M: 7.32%
• 1Y: 28.54%
• 3Y*: 24.46%
• 5Y*: 16.24%
• 10Y*: 17.27%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWMC vs. XLG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EWMC Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF	7.23%	7.81%	15.67%	18.79%	-11.63%	26.35%	15.60%	23.05%	-12.45%	13.05%
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF	7.57%	19.51%	33.49%	38.16%	-24.29%	30.77%	24.15%	32.04%	-3.59%	23.04%

Correlation

The correlation between EWMC and XLG is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.51
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.55
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.67
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.66
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2010	0.71

The correlation between EWMC and XLG shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (1 year) to 0.71 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EWMC vs. XLG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EWMC	XLG
Industrials	17.9%	1.9%
Consumer Cyclical	16.0%	11.3%
Financial Services	13.8%	9.6%
Technology	13.3%	43.9%
Healthcare	9.8%	7.0%
Real Estate	7.8%	-
Basic Materials	5.9%	0.6%
Energy	5.1%	2.7%
Consumer Defensive	5.0%	5.8%
Utilities	3.4%	-
Communication Services	2.0%	17.1%

Return for Risk

EWMC vs. XLG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWMC

EWMC Risk / Return Rank: 49
EWMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
EWMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
EWMC Omega Ratio Rank: 40
EWMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
EWMC Martin Ratio Rank: 55

XLG

XLG Risk / Return Rank: 56
XLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
XLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
XLG Omega Ratio Rank: 61
XLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
XLG Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWMC vs. XLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF (EWMC) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EWMC	XLG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.52	2.15	-0.63
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.23	2.92	-0.69
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.38	-0.12
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.22	2.31	+0.91
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.53	8.66	+0.87
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EWMC vs. XLG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWMC Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is comparable to the XLG Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWMC and XLG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EWMC	XLG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.52	2.15	-0.63
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.37	0.87	-0.50
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.50	0.92	-0.42
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.55	0.62	-0.08

Drawdowns

EWMC vs. XLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWMC drawdown since its inception was -43.12%, smaller than the maximum XLG drawdown of -52.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWMC and XLG.

Drawdown Indicators

	EWMC	XLG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.12%	-52.39%	+9.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.62%	-12.41%	+4.79%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.09%	-20.70%	-7.39%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.09%	-28.02%	-0.07%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.12%	-30.46%	-12.66%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.44%	+1.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.71%	-7.64%	+1.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.57%	3.30%	-0.73%

Volatility

EWMC vs. XLG - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF (EWMC) has a higher volatility of 3.83% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG) at 3.19%. This indicates that EWMC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EWMC	XLG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.83%	3.19%	+0.64%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.44%	9.80%	+0.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.13%	13.33%	+2.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.90%	18.68%	+2.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.25%	18.84%	+3.41%

EWMC vs. XLG - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWMC has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than XLG's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

EWMC vs. XLG - Dividend Comparison

EWMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, more than XLG's 0.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EWMC Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF	0.96%	1.19%	0.95%	0.96%	1.28%	0.92%	1.16%	1.25%	1.50%	1.14%	1.00%	1.43%
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF	0.60%	0.64%	0.72%	0.97%	1.34%	0.94%	1.25%	1.58%	2.00%	1.85%	2.00%	2.09%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EWMC and XLG in my portfolio?

EWMC and XLG have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EWMC or XLG?

EWMC has higher volatility (3.83%) compared to XLG (3.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWMC dropped -43.12% vs XLG's -52.39%.

Which ETF is better, EWMC or XLG?

On 10-year performance, XLG leads with 17.27% vs 11.00% for EWMC. On fees, XLG is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, XLG has been the lower-risk option at 3.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EWMC or XLG?

Over the 10-year period, XLG has performed better with a 17.27% return vs 11.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EWMC or XLG?

XLG is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for EWMC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EWMC or XLG?

EWMC has the higher dividend yield at 0.96%, compared with 0.60% for XLG.

What is the main difference between EWMC and XLG?

EWMC is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while XLG is S&P 500. EWMC tracks S&P MidCap 400 GARP Index, while XLG tracks S&P 500 Top 50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for EWMC and 0.20% for XLG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XLG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.