PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
EWMC vs. XLG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EWMC vs. XLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Equal Weight ETF (EWMC) and Invesco S&P 500® Top 50 ETF (XLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember0
14.23%
EWMC
XLG

Returns By Period


EWMC

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y (annualized)

N/A

10Y (annualized)

N/A

XLG

YTD

31.02%

1M

1.03%

6M

14.23%

1Y

34.86%

5Y (annualized)

18.37%

10Y (annualized)

14.89%

Key characteristics


EWMCXLG

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EWMC vs. XLG - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWMC has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than XLG's 0.20% expense ratio.


EWMC
Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Equal Weight ETF
Expense ratio chart for EWMC: current value at 0.40% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.40%
Expense ratio chart for XLG: current value at 0.20% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.20%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.7

The correlation between EWMC and XLG is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

EWMC vs. XLG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Equal Weight ETF (EWMC) and Invesco S&P 500® Top 50 ETF (XLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for EWMC, currently valued at 1.49, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.492.40
The chart of Sortino ratio for EWMC, currently valued at 3.03, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.003.033.15
The chart of Omega ratio for EWMC, currently valued at 1.86, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.861.44
The chart of Calmar ratio for EWMC, currently valued at 1.67, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.001.673.13
The chart of Martin ratio for EWMC, currently valued at 10.06, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0010.0712.97
EWMC
XLG

Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.503.003.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.49
2.40
EWMC
XLG

Dividends

EWMC vs. XLG - Dividend Comparison

EWMC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
EWMC
Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Equal Weight ETF
0.76%0.96%0.11%0.92%1.16%1.25%0.75%1.14%0.03%1.43%1.28%1.01%
XLG
Invesco S&P 500® Top 50 ETF
0.73%0.97%1.34%0.94%1.25%1.58%2.00%1.85%2.00%2.09%1.97%1.97%

Drawdowns

EWMC vs. XLG - Drawdown Comparison


-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.50%
-1.41%
EWMC
XLG

Volatility

EWMC vs. XLG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Equal Weight ETF (EWMC) is 0.00%, while Invesco S&P 500® Top 50 ETF (XLG) has a volatility of 4.76%. This indicates that EWMC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember0
4.76%
EWMC
XLG