EWMC vs. XLG
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Equal Weight ETF (EWMC) and Invesco S&P 500® Top 50 ETF (XLG).
EWMC and XLG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EWMC is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Equal Weight Index. It was launched on Dec 8, 2010. XLG is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Russell Top 50 Index. It was launched on May 10, 2005. Both EWMC and XLG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EWMC or XLG.
Correlation
The correlation between EWMC and XLG is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
EWMC vs. XLG - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
Returns By Period
EWMC
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
XLG
34.91%
2.97%
11.04%
35.23%
18.15%
15.20%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EWMC vs. XLG - Expense Ratio Comparison
EWMC has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than XLG's 0.20% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EWMC vs. XLG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Equal Weight ETF (EWMC) and Invesco S&P 500® Top 50 ETF (XLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
EWMC vs. XLG - Dividend Comparison
EWMC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWMC Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Equal Weight ETF | 0.57% | 0.96% | 0.11% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.25% | 0.75% | 1.14% | 0.03% | 1.43% | 1.28% | 1.01% |
XLG Invesco S&P 500® Top 50 ETF | 0.53% | 0.97% | 1.34% | 0.94% | 1.25% | 1.58% | 2.00% | 1.85% | 2.00% | 2.09% | 1.97% | 1.97% |
Drawdowns
EWMC vs. XLG - Drawdown Comparison
Volatility
EWMC vs. XLG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Equal Weight ETF (EWMC) is 0.00%, while Invesco S&P 500® Top 50 ETF (XLG) has a volatility of 4.11%. This indicates that EWMC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.