PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EWL vs. QQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EWL vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF (EWL) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWL achieves a 1.57% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 21.30% return. Over the past 10 years, EWL has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 9.27%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 21.94% annualized return.


EWL

1D
-1.39%
1M
0.96%
YTD
1.57%
6M
4.87%
1Y
12.76%
3Y*
11.12%
5Y*
6.33%
10Y*
9.27%

QQQ

1D
-0.26%
1M
10.60%
YTD
21.30%
6M
19.66%
1Y
41.82%
3Y*
28.78%
5Y*
17.97%
10Y*
21.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWL vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EWL
iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF
1.57%32.92%-2.80%17.67%-18.89%20.20%11.80%31.58%-9.21%23.34%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
21.30%20.77%25.58%54.86%-32.58%27.42%48.62%38.96%-0.13%32.66%

Correlation

The correlation between EWL and QQQ is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 1999

0.50

The correlation between EWL and QQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (3 years) to 0.55 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EWL vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EWL
QQQ

Healthcare

38.8%
4.2%

Financial Services

18.6%
0.2%

Consumer Defensive

14.9%
7.7%

Industrials

12.0%
2.8%

Basic Materials

6.6%
1.1%

Consumer Cyclical

5.4%
12.3%

Communication Services

1.3%
15.8%

Real Estate

0.9%
0.1%

Technology

0.9%
53.8%

Utilities

0.4%
1.4%

Energy

-

0.6%

Healthcare

EWL
38.8%
QQQ
4.2%

Financial Services

EWL
18.6%
QQQ
0.2%

Consumer Defensive

EWL
14.9%
QQQ
7.7%

Industrials

EWL
12.0%
QQQ
2.8%

Basic Materials

EWL
6.6%
QQQ
1.1%

Consumer Cyclical

EWL
5.4%
QQQ
12.3%

Communication Services

EWL
1.3%
QQQ
15.8%

Real Estate

EWL
0.9%
QQQ
0.1%

Technology

EWL
0.9%
QQQ
53.8%

Utilities

EWL
0.4%
QQQ
1.4%

Energy

EWL

-

QQQ
0.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EWL vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWL
EWL Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
EWL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWL Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
EWL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWL Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWL vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF (EWL) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EWLQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.45

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.95

3.51

-2.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.10

13.49

-10.40

EWL vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWL Sharpe Ratio is 0.82, which is lower than the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWL and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EWLQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

2.64

-1.82

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

0.81

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.99

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.41

-0.06

Drawdowns

EWL vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWL drawdown since its inception was -51.62%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWL and QQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EWLQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.62%

-82.97%

+31.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.48%

-11.96%

-1.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.48%

-22.77%

+9.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.99%

-35.12%

+6.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.99%

-35.12%

+6.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.42%

-0.26%

-6.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.09%

-32.79%

+21.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.13%

3.11%

+1.02%

Volatility

EWL vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF (EWL) has a higher volatility of 5.07% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 4.49%. This indicates that EWL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EWLQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.07%

4.49%

+0.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.24%

12.10%

+0.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.71%

15.94%

-0.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.07%

22.38%

-6.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.47%

22.29%

-5.82%

EWL vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWL has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

EWL vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

EWL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%, more than QQQ's 0.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EWL
iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF
1.68%1.71%2.21%2.12%2.04%1.73%1.45%1.85%2.56%2.05%2.75%2.58%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.38%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


EWL and QQQ have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EWL has higher volatility (5.07%) compared to QQQ (4.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWL dropped -51.62% vs QQQ's -82.97%.

On 10-year performance, QQQ leads with 21.94% vs 9.27% for EWL. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, QQQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 21.94% return vs 9.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for EWL.

EWL has the higher dividend yield at 1.68%, compared with 0.38% for QQQ.

EWL is categorized as Europe Equities, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. EWL tracks MSCI Switzerland Index, while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for EWL and 0.18% for QQQ.

QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EWL and QQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer