EWL vs. QQQ
EWL (iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EWL is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Switzerland Index, while QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EWL returned 9.27%/yr vs 21.94%/yr for QQQ. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EWL charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQ.
Performance
EWL vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EWL achieves a 1.57% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 21.30% return. Over the past 10 years, EWL has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 9.27%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 21.94% annualized return.
EWL
- 1D
- -1.39%
- 1M
- 0.96%
- YTD
- 1.57%
- 6M
- 4.87%
- 1Y
- 12.76%
- 3Y*
- 11.12%
- 5Y*
- 6.33%
- 10Y*
- 9.27%
QQQ
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 10.60%
- YTD
- 21.30%
- 6M
- 19.66%
- 1Y
- 41.82%
- 3Y*
- 28.78%
- 5Y*
- 17.97%
- 10Y*
- 21.94%
EWL vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWL iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF | 1.57% | 32.92% | -2.80% | 17.67% | -18.89% | 20.20% | 11.80% | 31.58% | -9.21% | 23.34% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 21.30% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 48.62% | 38.96% | -0.13% | 32.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between EWL and QQQ is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 1999 | 0.50 |
The correlation between EWL and QQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (3 years) to 0.55 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EWL vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EWL
QQQ
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Real Estate
Technology
Utilities
Energy
-
Healthcare
EWL
QQQ
Financial Services
EWL
QQQ
Consumer Defensive
EWL
QQQ
Industrials
EWL
QQQ
Basic Materials
EWL
QQQ
Consumer Cyclical
EWL
QQQ
Communication Services
EWL
QQQ
Real Estate
EWL
QQQ
Technology
EWL
QQQ
Utilities
EWL
QQQ
Energy
EWL
-
QQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EWL vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
EWL
QQQ
EWL vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF (EWL) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EWL | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.45 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.95 | 3.51 | -2.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.10 | 13.49 | -10.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EWL | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 | 2.64 | -1.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 | 0.81 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | 0.99 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.41 | -0.06 |
Drawdowns
EWL vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EWL drawdown since its inception was -51.62%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWL and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EWL | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.62% | -82.97% | +31.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.48% | -11.96% | -1.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.48% | -22.77% | +9.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.99% | -35.12% | +6.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.99% | -35.12% | +6.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.42% | -0.26% | -6.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.09% | -32.79% | +21.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.13% | 3.11% | +1.02% |
Volatility
EWL vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF (EWL) has a higher volatility of 5.07% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 4.49%. This indicates that EWL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EWL | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.07% | 4.49% | +0.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.24% | 12.10% | +0.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.71% | 15.94% | -0.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.07% | 22.38% | -6.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.47% | 22.29% | -5.82% |
EWL vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
EWL has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
EWL vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
EWL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%, more than QQQ's 0.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWL iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF | 1.68% | 1.71% | 2.21% | 2.12% | 2.04% | 1.73% | 1.45% | 1.85% | 2.56% | 2.05% | 2.75% | 2.58% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.38% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EWL and QQQ have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EWL has higher volatility (5.07%) compared to QQQ (4.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWL dropped -51.62% vs QQQ's -82.97%.
On 10-year performance, QQQ leads with 21.94% vs 9.27% for EWL. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, QQQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 21.94% return vs 9.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for EWL.
EWL has the higher dividend yield at 1.68%, compared with 0.38% for QQQ.
EWL is categorized as Europe Equities, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. EWL tracks MSCI Switzerland Index, while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for EWL and 0.18% for QQQ.
QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EWL and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer