EWJ vs. EWH
EWJ (iShares MSCI Japan ETF) and EWH (iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EWJ is a Japan Equities fund tracking the MSCI Japan Index, while EWH is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Hong Kong Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EWJ returned 9.28%/yr vs 4.68%/yr for EWH. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.49% expense ratio.
Performance
EWJ vs. EWH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EWJ achieves a 16.58% return, which is significantly higher than EWH's 5.98% return. Over the past 10 years, EWJ has outperformed EWH with an annualized return of 9.28%, while EWH has yielded a comparatively lower 4.68% annualized return.
EWJ
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 5.46%
- YTD
- 16.58%
- 6M
- 16.78%
- 1Y
- 32.89%
- 3Y*
- 18.51%
- 5Y*
- 8.84%
- 10Y*
- 9.28%
EWH
- 1D
- -1.27%
- 1M
- -5.02%
- YTD
- 5.98%
- 6M
- 5.27%
- 1Y
- 22.22%
- 3Y*
- 9.34%
- 5Y*
- -0.21%
- 10Y*
- 4.68%
EWJ vs. EWH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWJ iShares MSCI Japan ETF | 16.58% | 25.84% | 7.03% | 20.29% | -17.72% | 1.16% | 15.40% | 19.34% | -14.10% | 24.27% |
EWH iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF | 5.98% | 34.50% | 0.00% | -13.87% | -6.81% | -3.49% | 4.17% | 10.74% | -8.76% | 36.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between EWJ and EWH is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 1996 | 0.51 |
The correlation between EWJ and EWH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.41 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.
EWJ vs. EWH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EWJ
EWH
Industrials
Technology
-
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
Utilities
Energy
-
Industrials
EWJ
EWH
Technology
EWJ
EWH
-
Financial Services
EWJ
EWH
Consumer Cyclical
EWJ
EWH
Communication Services
EWJ
EWH
Healthcare
EWJ
EWH
-
Consumer Defensive
EWJ
EWH
Basic Materials
EWJ
EWH
-
Real Estate
EWJ
EWH
Utilities
EWJ
EWH
Energy
EWJ
EWH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EWJ vs. EWH — Risk / Return Rank
EWJ
EWH
EWJ vs. EWH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Japan ETF (EWJ) and iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF (EWH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EWJ | EWH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.24 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.43 | 2.70 | -0.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.23 | 7.10 | +1.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EWJ | EWH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.70 | 1.37 | +0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 | -0.01 | +0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | 0.24 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.11 | 0.18 | -0.06 |
Drawdowns
EWJ vs. EWH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EWJ drawdown since its inception was -60.93%, smaller than the maximum EWH drawdown of -66.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWJ and EWH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EWJ | EWH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.93% | -66.44% | +5.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.59% | -8.27% | -5.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.68% | -24.93% | +10.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.14% | -41.46% | +8.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.14% | -42.71% | +9.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -8.27% | +8.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.74% | -19.48% | -2.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.01% | 3.14% | +0.87% |
Volatility
EWJ vs. EWH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Japan ETF (EWJ) is 4.21%, while iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF (EWH) has a volatility of 4.94%. This indicates that EWJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EWH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EWJ | EWH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.21% | 4.94% | -0.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.02% | 11.78% | +3.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.49% | 16.29% | +3.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.23% | 20.00% | -1.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.27% | 19.56% | -2.29% |
EWJ vs. EWH - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both EWJ and EWH have an expense ratio of 0.49%.
Dividends
EWJ vs. EWH - Dividend Comparison
EWJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.88%, less than EWH's 4.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWH iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF | 4.90% | 5.20% | 4.17% | 4.28% | 2.91% | 2.78% | 2.56% | 2.71% | 2.93% | 4.35% | 3.08% | 2.63% |
EWJ iShares MSCI Japan ETF | 3.88% | 4.52% | 2.34% | 2.03% | 1.23% | 2.08% | 1.04% | 2.03% | 1.71% | 1.25% | 1.95% | 1.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EWJ and EWH have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EWH has higher volatility (4.94%) compared to EWJ (4.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWJ dropped -60.93% vs EWH's -66.44%.
On 10-year performance, EWJ leads with 9.28% vs 4.68% for EWH. Both ETFs have the same 0.49% expense ratio. On volatility, EWJ has been the lower-risk option at 4.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EWJ has performed better with a 9.28% return vs 4.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EWJ and EWH have the same expense ratio: 0.49% per year.
EWH has the higher dividend yield at 4.90%, compared with 3.88% for EWJ.
EWJ is categorized as Japan Equities, while EWH is Asia Pacific Equities. EWJ tracks MSCI Japan Index, while EWH tracks MSCI Hong Kong Index.
EWJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EWJ and EWH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer