PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EWI vs. EDEN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EWI vs. EDEN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Italy ETF (EWI) and iShares MSCI Denmark ETF (EDEN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWI achieves a 9.50% return, which is significantly higher than EDEN's -3.95% return. Over the past 10 years, EWI has outperformed EDEN with an annualized return of 13.21%, while EDEN has yielded a comparatively lower 8.15% annualized return.


EWI

1D
0.37%
1M
3.10%
YTD
9.50%
6M
13.71%
1Y
26.93%
3Y*
29.05%
5Y*
16.05%
10Y*
13.21%

EDEN

1D
-1.50%
1M
-1.50%
YTD
-3.95%
6M
0.51%
1Y
-2.97%
3Y*
2.98%
5Y*
2.24%
10Y*
8.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWI vs. EDEN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EWI
iShares MSCI Italy ETF
9.50%55.72%10.23%30.63%-14.16%14.38%1.69%26.98%-17.18%28.70%
EDEN
iShares MSCI Denmark ETF
-3.95%10.58%-3.94%17.99%-11.47%14.81%42.56%24.37%-14.43%35.39%

Correlation

The correlation between EWI and EDEN is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2012

0.63

The correlation between EWI and EDEN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

EWI vs. EDEN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EWI
EDEN

Financial Services

47.5%
16.2%

Utilities

18.3%
3.9%

Industrials

12.5%
31.3%

Consumer Cyclical

8.7%
2.0%

Energy

7.5%
1.1%

Communication Services

2.2%

-

Healthcare

1.4%
34.8%

Consumer Defensive

0.9%
4.9%

Basic Materials

0.6%
4.8%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

1.1%

Financial Services

EWI
47.5%
EDEN
16.2%

Utilities

EWI
18.3%
EDEN
3.9%

Industrials

EWI
12.5%
EDEN
31.3%

Consumer Cyclical

EWI
8.7%
EDEN
2.0%

Energy

EWI
7.5%
EDEN
1.1%

Communication Services

EWI
2.2%
EDEN

-

Healthcare

EWI
1.4%
EDEN
34.8%

Consumer Defensive

EWI
0.9%
EDEN
4.9%

Basic Materials

EWI
0.6%
EDEN
4.8%

Real Estate

EWI

-

EDEN

-

Technology

EWI

-

EDEN
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EWI vs. EDEN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWI
EWI Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
EWI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWI Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWI Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
EWI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWI Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

EDEN
EDEN Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
EDEN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDEN Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDEN Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
EDEN Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDEN Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWI vs. EDEN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Italy ETF (EWI) and iShares MSCI Denmark ETF (EDEN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EWIEDENDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.50

-0.14

+1.65

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.11

-0.05

+2.16

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

0.99

+0.27

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.27

-0.10

+2.37

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.49

-0.21

+8.69

EWI vs. EDEN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWI Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is higher than the EDEN Sharpe Ratio of -0.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWI and EDEN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EWIEDENDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.50

-0.14

+1.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

0.11

+0.65

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

0.42

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.64

-0.41

Drawdowns

EWI vs. EDEN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWI drawdown since its inception was -70.38%, which is greater than EDEN's maximum drawdown of -36.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWI and EDEN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EWIEDENDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.38%

-36.61%

-33.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.48%

-21.17%

+8.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.80%

-29.31%

+12.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.25%

-36.61%

+1.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.00%

-36.61%

-6.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.20%

-14.36%

+14.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.95%

-7.36%

-21.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.34%

10.00%

-6.66%

Volatility

EWI vs. EDEN - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Italy ETF (EWI) has a higher volatility of 6.94% compared to iShares MSCI Denmark ETF (EDEN) at 5.09%. This indicates that EWI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EDEN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EWIEDENDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.94%

5.09%

+1.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.59%

15.59%

-1.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.01%

20.92%

-2.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.09%

20.21%

+0.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.26%

19.43%

+3.83%

EWI vs. EDEN - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWI has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than EDEN's 0.53% expense ratio.


Dividends

EWI vs. EDEN - Dividend Comparison

EWI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.56%, less than EDEN's 2.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EDEN
iShares MSCI Denmark ETF
2.90%2.79%1.50%1.92%1.47%0.74%0.42%2.36%2.01%2.03%1.28%1.46%
EWI
iShares MSCI Italy ETF
2.56%2.80%4.07%3.40%4.57%2.63%1.66%3.80%4.71%2.19%3.64%2.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


EWI and EDEN have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EWI has higher volatility (6.94%) compared to EDEN (5.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWI dropped -70.38% vs EDEN's -36.61%.

On 10-year performance, EWI leads with 13.21% vs 8.15% for EDEN. On fees, EWI is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, EDEN has been the lower-risk option at 5.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EWI has performed better with a 13.21% return vs 8.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EWI is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.53% for EDEN.

EDEN has the higher dividend yield at 2.90%, compared with 2.56% for EWI.

EWI tracks MSCI Italy Index, while EDEN tracks MSCI Denmark IMI 25/50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for EWI and 0.53% for EDEN.

EWI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs -0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EWI and EDEN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer