PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EWI vs. EDEN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EWI vs. EDEN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Italy ETF (EWI) and iShares MSCI Denmark ETF (EDEN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWI achieves a 15.62% return, which is significantly higher than EDEN's 0.71% return. Over the past 10 years, EWI has outperformed EDEN with an annualized return of 14.81%, while EDEN has yielded a comparatively lower 9.03% annualized return.


EWI

1D
-0.10%
1M
1.60%
6M
12.41%
YTD
15.62%
1Y
33.05%
3Y*
27.26%
5Y*
17.91%
10Y*
14.81%
ALL TIME*
6.60%

EDEN

1D
-2.33%
1M
-1.18%
6M
-5.46%
YTD
0.71%
1Y
11.69%
3Y*
4.23%
5Y*
2.08%
10Y*
9.03%
ALL TIME*
12.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$542.51K$1.19M$1.06M
$23.18M$26.44M$25.34M

EWI vs. EDEN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EWI
iShares MSCI Italy ETF
15.62%55.72%10.23%30.63%-14.16%14.38%1.69%26.98%-17.18%28.70%
EDEN
iShares MSCI Denmark ETF
0.71%10.58%-3.94%17.99%-11.47%14.81%42.56%24.37%-14.43%35.39%

Correlation

The correlation between EWI and EDEN is 0.59, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2012

0.62

The correlation between EWI and EDEN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

EWI vs. EDEN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EWI
EDEN

Financial Services

50.1%
15.5%

Utilities

18.0%
3.2%

Industrials

10.4%
29.0%

Consumer Cyclical

9.0%
2.8%

Energy

6.6%
0.9%

Communication Services

2.7%

-

Healthcare

1.3%
38.3%

Basic Materials

1.0%
4.8%

Consumer Defensive

0.9%
4.7%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

0.9%

Financial Services

EWI
50.1%
EDEN
15.5%

Utilities

EWI
18.0%
EDEN
3.2%

Industrials

EWI
10.4%
EDEN
29.0%

Consumer Cyclical

EWI
9.0%
EDEN
2.8%

Energy

EWI
6.6%
EDEN
0.9%

Communication Services

EWI
2.7%
EDEN

-

Healthcare

EWI
1.3%
EDEN
38.3%

Basic Materials

EWI
1.0%
EDEN
4.8%

Consumer Defensive

EWI
0.9%
EDEN
4.7%

Real Estate

EWI

-

EDEN

-

Technology

EWI

-

EDEN
0.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EWI vs. EDEN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EWI
EWI Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
EWI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWI Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
EWI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWI Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

EDEN
EDEN Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
EDEN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDEN Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDEN Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
EDEN Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDEN Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EWI vs. EDEN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Italy ETF (EWI) and iShares MSCI Denmark ETF (EDEN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EWIEDENDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.13

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.57

0.59

+1.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.62

1.37

+8.25

EWI vs. EDEN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWI Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is higher than the EDEN Sharpe Ratio of 0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWI and EDEN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EWI vs. EDEN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWI drawdown since its inception was -70.38%, which is greater than EDEN's maximum drawdown of -36.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWI and EDEN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EWIEDENDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.38%

-36.61%

-33.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.48%

-21.17%

+8.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.80%

-29.31%

+12.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.25%

-36.61%

+1.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.00%

-36.61%

-6.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

-10.20%

+10.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.79%

-7.41%

-21.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.32%

9.04%

-5.72%

Volatility

EWI vs. EDEN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Italy ETF (EWI) is 5.05%, while iShares MSCI Denmark ETF (EDEN) has a volatility of 5.77%. This indicates that EWI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EDEN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EWIEDENDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.05%

5.77%

-0.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.63%

15.53%

+0.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.38%

19.78%

-1.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.11%

20.37%

+0.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.51%

19.20%

+3.31%

EWI vs. EDEN - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWI has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than EDEN's 0.53% expense ratio.


Dividends

EWI vs. EDEN - Dividend Comparison

EWI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.04%, which matches EDEN's 3.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EDEN
iShares MSCI Denmark ETF
3.04%2.79%1.50%1.92%1.47%0.74%0.42%2.36%2.01%2.03%1.28%1.46%
EWI
iShares MSCI Italy ETF
3.04%2.80%4.07%3.40%4.57%2.63%1.66%3.80%4.71%2.19%3.64%2.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


EWI and EDEN have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EDEN has higher volatility (5.77%) compared to EWI (5.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWI dropped -70.38% vs EDEN's -36.61%.

On 10-year performance, EWI leads with 14.81% vs 9.03% for EDEN. On fees, EWI is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, EWI has been the lower-risk option at 5.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EWI has performed better with a 14.81% return vs 9.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EWI is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.53% for EDEN.

EWI and EDEN have nearly identical dividend yields, around 3.04%.

EWI tracks MSCI Italy 25/50 Index (Net), while EDEN tracks MSCI Denmark IMI 25/50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for EWI and 0.53% for EDEN.

EWI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EWI and EDEN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer