PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
EWH vs. ASHR
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


EWHASHR
YTD Return5.98%14.35%
1Y Return7.62%11.18%
3Y Return (Ann)-6.44%-9.45%
5Y Return (Ann)-3.14%0.12%
10Y Return (Ann)1.41%4.01%
Sharpe Ratio0.520.42
Sortino Ratio0.890.82
Omega Ratio1.111.13
Calmar Ratio0.290.24
Martin Ratio1.381.49
Ulcer Index8.95%8.33%
Daily Std Dev23.56%29.42%
Max Drawdown-66.43%-51.30%
Current Drawdown-28.01%-38.39%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.6

The correlation between EWH and ASHR is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

EWH vs. ASHR - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, EWH achieves a 5.98% return, which is significantly lower than ASHR's 14.35% return. Over the past 10 years, EWH has underperformed ASHR with an annualized return of 1.41%, while ASHR has yielded a comparatively higher 4.01% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%80.00%100.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
25.33%
57.74%
EWH
ASHR

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EWH vs. ASHR - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWH has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than ASHR's 0.65% expense ratio.


ASHR
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund
Expense ratio chart for ASHR: current value at 0.65% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.65%
Expense ratio chart for EWH: current value at 0.49% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.49%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

EWH vs. ASHR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF (EWH) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund (ASHR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EWH
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for EWH, currently valued at 0.52, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.000.52
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for EWH, currently valued at 0.89, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.000.89
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for EWH, currently valued at 1.11, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.003.501.11
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for EWH, currently valued at 0.29, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.000.29
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for EWH, currently valued at 1.38, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.001.38
ASHR
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ASHR, currently valued at 0.42, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.000.42
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for ASHR, currently valued at 0.82, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.000.82
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for ASHR, currently valued at 1.13, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.003.501.13
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for ASHR, currently valued at 0.24, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.000.24
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for ASHR, currently valued at 1.49, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.001.49

EWH vs. ASHR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWH Sharpe Ratio is 0.52, which is comparable to the ASHR Sharpe Ratio of 0.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWH and ASHR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.001.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.52
0.42
EWH
ASHR

Dividends

EWH vs. ASHR - Dividend Comparison

EWH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.33%, more than ASHR's 2.17% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
EWH
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF
4.33%4.28%2.91%2.78%2.56%2.71%2.93%4.35%3.08%2.63%3.52%2.96%
ASHR
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund
2.17%2.48%1.13%0.88%0.81%0.98%1.32%0.84%0.73%30.13%0.27%0.00%

Drawdowns

EWH vs. ASHR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWH drawdown since its inception was -66.43%, which is greater than ASHR's maximum drawdown of -51.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWH and ASHR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-45.00%-40.00%-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-28.01%
-38.39%
EWH
ASHR

Volatility

EWH vs. ASHR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF (EWH) is 10.66%, while Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund (ASHR) has a volatility of 21.01%. This indicates that EWH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASHR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
10.66%
21.01%
EWH
ASHR