EWC vs. IWF
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI Canada ETF (EWC) and iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF).
EWC and IWF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EWC is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Canada Index. It was launched on Mar 12, 1996. IWF is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth Index. It was launched on May 22, 2000. Both EWC and IWF are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EWC or IWF.
Correlation
The correlation between EWC and IWF is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
EWC vs. IWF - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
EWC:
1.08
IWF:
2.13
EWC:
1.53
IWF:
2.75
EWC:
1.19
IWF:
1.39
EWC:
1.58
IWF:
2.77
EWC:
6.96
IWF:
10.82
EWC:
2.09%
IWF:
3.39%
EWC:
13.40%
IWF:
17.22%
EWC:
-60.75%
IWF:
-64.18%
EWC:
-6.51%
IWF:
-2.67%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EWC achieves a 11.35% return, which is significantly lower than IWF's 35.03% return. Over the past 10 years, EWC has underperformed IWF with an annualized return of 5.62%, while IWF has yielded a comparatively higher 16.65% annualized return.
EWC
11.35%
-4.14%
10.89%
12.95%
8.50%
5.62%
IWF
35.03%
3.82%
12.18%
35.31%
19.25%
16.65%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EWC vs. IWF - Expense Ratio Comparison
EWC has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than IWF's 0.19% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EWC vs. IWF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Canada ETF (EWC) and iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
EWC vs. IWF - Dividend Comparison
EWC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.25%, more than IWF's 0.45% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWC iShares MSCI Canada ETF | 2.25% | 2.27% | 2.34% | 1.85% | 2.09% | 2.16% | 2.65% | 1.97% | 1.75% | 2.34% | 2.15% | 2.37% |
IWF iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF | 0.45% | 0.67% | 0.91% | 0.50% | 0.66% | 0.99% | 1.27% | 1.10% | 1.43% | 1.37% | 1.33% | 1.29% |
Drawdowns
EWC vs. IWF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EWC drawdown since its inception was -60.75%, smaller than the maximum IWF drawdown of -64.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWC and IWF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
EWC vs. IWF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Canada ETF (EWC) is 4.32%, while iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF) has a volatility of 4.93%. This indicates that EWC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.