PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
EWC vs. CNDA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between EWC and CNDA is -0.01. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


-0.50.00.51.0-0.0

Performance

EWC vs. CNDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Canada ETF (EWC) and Concord Acquisition Corp II (CNDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-2.00%0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
4.71%
2.38%
EWC
CNDA

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

EWC:

1.24

CNDA:

0.90

Sortino Ratio

EWC:

1.75

CNDA:

1.26

Omega Ratio

EWC:

1.22

CNDA:

1.30

Calmar Ratio

EWC:

2.27

CNDA:

1.20

Martin Ratio

EWC:

6.37

CNDA:

5.66

Ulcer Index

EWC:

2.56%

CNDA:

0.92%

Daily Std Dev

EWC:

13.13%

CNDA:

7.46%

Max Drawdown

EWC:

-60.75%

CNDA:

-4.78%

Current Drawdown

EWC:

-2.72%

CNDA:

-0.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWC achieves a 3.10% return, which is significantly higher than CNDA's 2.28% return.


EWC

YTD

3.10%

1M

1.19%

6M

4.71%

1Y

15.36%

5Y*

8.65%

10Y*

6.36%

CNDA

YTD

2.28%

1M

2.20%

6M

2.38%

1Y

2.87%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

EWC vs. CNDA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of EWC is 5555
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of EWC is 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of EWC is 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of EWC is 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of EWC is 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of EWC is 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

CNDA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CNDA is 7878
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CNDA is 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CNDA is 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CNDA is 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CNDA is 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CNDA is 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

EWC vs. CNDA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Canada ETF (EWC) and Concord Acquisition Corp II (CNDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for EWC, currently valued at 1.24, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.240.54
The chart of Sortino ratio for EWC, currently valued at 1.75, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.001.750.77
The chart of Omega ratio for EWC, currently valued at 1.22, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.221.25
The chart of Calmar ratio for EWC, currently valued at 2.27, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.002.270.91
The chart of Martin ratio for EWC, currently valued at 6.37, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.006.371.59
EWC
CNDA

The current EWC Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is higher than the CNDA Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWC and CNDA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.50SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
1.24
0.54
EWC
CNDA

Dividends

EWC vs. CNDA - Dividend Comparison

EWC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%, while CNDA has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
EWC
iShares MSCI Canada ETF
2.17%2.23%2.27%2.34%1.85%2.09%2.16%2.65%1.97%1.75%2.34%2.15%
CNDA
Concord Acquisition Corp II
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

EWC vs. CNDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWC drawdown since its inception was -60.75%, which is greater than CNDA's maximum drawdown of -4.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWC and CNDA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-2.72%
-0.00%
EWC
CNDA

Volatility

EWC vs. CNDA - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Canada ETF (EWC) has a higher volatility of 4.29% compared to Concord Acquisition Corp II (CNDA) at 1.52%. This indicates that EWC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CNDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
4.29%
1.52%
EWC
CNDA
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab